The "Quick Start Guide" for Conducting and Publishing Longitudinal Research

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 413-422

  Ployhart, Robert E ^a   Ward, Anna Katherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Longitudinal research; Modeling change; Research methods; Study design; Time

Indexed keywords

EID: 80855133475     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-011-9209-6     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Anseel, F., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., & Choragwicka, B. (2010). Response rates in organizational science, 1995-2008. A meta-analytic review and guidelines for survey researchers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 335-349.
3. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, H., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1086-1120.
4. Biesanz, J. C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A. A., Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30-52.
5. Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362-387.
6. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Chen, G., Ployhart, R. E., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Anderson, N., & Bliese, P. D. (2011). The power of momentum: A new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, in press.
8. Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325-334.
9. Duncan, S. C., Duncan, T. E., & Hops, H. (1996). Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 236-248.
10. George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26, 657-684.
11. Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1996). Maximizing the usefulness of data obtained with planned missing value patterns: An application of maximum likelihood procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 197-218.
12. Graham, J. W., Taylor, B. J., & Cumsille, P. E. (2001). Planned missing data designs in analysis of change. In L. Collins & M. Sayers (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 335-353). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
15. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23-44.
16. Mehta, P. D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. Psychological Methods, 5, 23-43.
17. Mitchell, T. R., & James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530-547.
18. Newman, D. A. (2003). Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: A simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 328-362.
19. Palmer, R. F., & Royall, D. R. (2010). Missing data? Plan on it!. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58, 343-348.
20. Ployhart, R. E., & Kim, Y. (in press). Dynamic longitudinal growth modeling. Dynamic longitudinal growth models. In J. Cortina & R. Landis (Eds.), Frontiers of methodology in organizational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
21. Ployhart, R. E., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94-120.
22. Ployhart, R. E., Weekley, J. A., & Ramsey, J. (2009). The consequences of human resource stocks and flows: A longitudinal examination of unit service orientation and unit effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 996-1015.
23. Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387-401.
24. Rogosa, D. R. (1995). Myths and methods: "myths about longitudinal research" plus supplemental questions. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 3-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Willett, J. B. (1989). Some results on reliability for the longitudinal measurement of change: Implications for the design of studies of individual growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 587-602.