Conical Epidermal Cells Allow Bees to Grip Flowers and Increase Foraging Efficiency

Current Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 948-953

  Whitney, Heather M ^a   Chittka, Lars ^b   Bruce, Toby J A ^c   Glover, Beverley J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

EVO_ECOL

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEE; CELL SHAPE; COLOR; CYTOLOGY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWER; FOOD PREFERENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT EPIDERMIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ANIMALS; BEES; CELL SHAPE; COLOR; CUES; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; FOOD PREFERENCES; PLANT EPIDERMIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ANIMALIA; ANTIRRHINUM; APOIDEA; HEXAPODA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 67349287012     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.051     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kay Q.O.N., Daoud H.S., and Stirton C.H. Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 83 (1981) 57-83
2. Martin C., and Glover B.J. Functional aspects of cell patterning in aerial epidermis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10 (2007) 70-82
3. Kevan P.G., and Lane M.A. Flower petal microtexture is a tactile cue for bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 (1985) 4750-4752
4. Comba L., Corbet S.A., Hunt H., Outram S., Parker J.S., and Glover B.J. The role of genes influencing the corolla in pollination of Antirrhinum majus. Plant Cell Environ. 23 (2000) 639-647
5. Yoshioka Y., Ohashi K., Konuma A., Iwata H., Ohsawa R., and Ninomiya S. Ability of bumblebees to discriminate differences in the shape of artificial flowers of Primula sieboldii (Primulaceae). Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 99 (2007) 1175-1182
6. Kevan P.G., and Baker H.G. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28 (1983) 407-453
7. Daumer K. Reizmetrische Untersuchung des Farbensehens der Bienen. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie 38 (1956) 413-478
8. Wright G.A., Lutmerding A., Dudareva N., and Smith B.H. Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honeybees (Apis mellifera). J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 191 (2005) 105-114
9. Chittka L., Shmida A., Troje N., and Menzel R. Ultraviolet as a component of flower reflections, and the colour perception of hymenoptera. Vision Res. 34 (1994) 1489-1508
10. Giger A.D., and Srinivasan M.V. Pattern recognition in honeybees: Chromatic properties of orientation analysis. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 178 (1996) 763-769
11. Giurfa M., and Núñez J. Colour signals and choice behaviour of the honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica). J. Insect Physiol. 35 (1989) 907-910
12. Giurfa M., Backhaus W., and Menzel R. Color and angular orientation in the discrimination of bilateral symmetric patterns in the honeybee. Naturwissenschaften 82 (1995) 198-201
13. Giurfa M., Vorobyev M., Brandt R., Posner B., and Menzel R. Discrimination of coloured stimuli by honeybees: Alternative use of achromatic and chromatic signals. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 180 (1997) 235-243
14. Lunau K. Interspecific diversity and uniformity of flower colour patterns as cues for learned discrimination and innate detection of flowers. Experientia 49 (1993) 1002-1010
15. Waser N.M., and Price M.V. Pollinator behaviour and natural selection for flower colour in Delphinium neldonii. Nature 302 (1983) 422-424
16. Noda K., Glover B.J., Linstead P., and Martin C. Flower colour intensity depends on specialized cell shape controlled by a Myb-related transcription factor. Nature 369 (1994) 661-664
17. Gorton H.L., and Vogelmann T.C. Effects of epidermal cell shape and pigmentation on optical properties of Antirrhinum petals at visible and ultraviolet wavelengths. Plant Physiol. 112 (1996) 879-888
18. Glover B.J., and Martin C. The role of petal cell shape and pigmentation in pollination success in Antirrhinum majus. Heredity 80 (1998) 778-784
19. Goodwin S.M., Kolosova N., Kish C.M., Wood K.V., Dudareva N., and Jenks M.A. Cuticle characteristics and volatile emissions of petals in Antirrhinum majus. Physiol. Plant. 117 (2003) 435-443
20. Erber J., Kierzek S., Sander E., and Grandy K. Tactile learning in the honeybee. J. Comp. Physiol. [A] 183 (1998) 737-744
21. Scheiner R., Kuritz-Kaiser A., Menzel R., and Erber J. Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees. Learn. Mem. 12 (2005) 626-635
22. Dyer A.G., Whitney H.M., Arnold S.E.J., Glover B.J., and Chittka L. Mutations perturbing petal cell shape and anthocyanin synthesis influence bumblebee perception of Antirrhinum majus flower colour. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 1 (2007) 45-55
23. Dyer A.G., and Chittka L. Fine colour discrimination requires differential conditioning in bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91 (2004) 224-227
24. Waser N., and Chittka L. Bedazzled by flowers. Nature 394 (1998) 835-836
25. Laverty T.M., and Plowright R.C. Flower handling by bumblebees: A comparison of specialists and generalists. Anim. Behav. 36 (1988) 733-740
26. Laverty T.M. The flower-visiting behaviour of bumble bees: Floral complexity and learning. Can. J. Zool. 58 (1980) 1324-1335
27. Saleh N., Ohashi K., Thomson J.D., and Chittka L. Facultative use of the repellent scent mark in foraging bumblebees: Complex versus simple flowers. Anim. Behav. 71 (2006) 847-854
28. Wienand U., Sommer H., Schwarz Z., Shepherd N., Saedler H., Kreuzaler F., Ragg H., Fautz E., Hahlbrock K., Harrison B., et al. A general method to identify plant structural genes among genomic DNA clones using transposable element induced mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 187 (1982) 195-201
29. Green P.B., and Linstead P. A procedure for SEM of complex shoot structures applied to the inflorescence of snapdragon (Antirrhinum). Protoplasma 158 (1990) 33-38