High-density marker imputation accuracy in sixteen French cattle breeds

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hozé, Chris ^a,b   Fouilloux, Marie Noëlle ^c   Venot, Eric ^a   Guillaume, François ^a,c   Dassonneville, Romain ^a,c   Fritz, Sébastien ^b   Ducrocq, Vincent ^a   Phocas, Florence ^a   Boichard, Didier ^a   Croiseau, Pascal ^a  

^a UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^b UMR1313 Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative ^*  (France)

^c Institut de l'Elevage   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATTLE; ERROR ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; HYBRID; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION SIZE;

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOVINAE;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; DNA MICROARRAY; FRANCE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FRANCE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE;

EID: 84883775263     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-33     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
2. Technical note: prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matrices. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, J Anim Sci 2008 86 2089 2092 10.2527/jas.2007-0733 18407982
3. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Goddard M, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696
4. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2008 179 1503 1512 10.1534/genetics.107.084301 18622038
5. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Scheet P, Stephens M, Am J Hum Genet 2006 78 629 644 10.1086/502802 16532393
6. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Browning SR, Browning BL, Am J Hum Genet 2007 81 1084 1097 10.1086/521987 17924348 (Pubitemid 47580259)
7. MaCH: using sequence and genotype data to estimate haplotypes and unobserved genotypes. Li Y, Willer CJ, Ding J, Scheet P, Abecasis GR, Genet Epidemiol 2010 34 816 834 10.1002/gepi.20533 21058334
8. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J, PLoS Genet 2009 5 1000529 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000529 19543373
9. FImpute-An efficient imputation algorithm for dairy cattle populations. Sargolzaei M, Chesnais JP, Schenkel F, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 421
10. A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Druet T, Georges M, Genetics 2010 184 789 798 10.1534/genetics.109. 108431 20008575
11. A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes. Hickey JM, Kinghorn BP, Tier B, Wilson JF, Dunstan N, van der Werf JHJ, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 12 10.1186/1297-9686-43-12 21388557
12. Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. VanRaden PM, O'Connell JR, Wiggans GR, Weigel KA, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 10 10.1186/1297-9686-43-10 21366914
13. An ensemble-based approach to imputation of moderate-density genotypes for genomic selection with application to Angus cattle. Sun C, Wu XL, Weigel KA, Rosa GJM, Bauck S, Woodward BW, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Gianola D, Genet Res (Camb) 2012 94 133 150 10.1017/S001667231200033X
14. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle. Mulder HA, Calus MPL, Druet T, Schrooten C, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 876 889 10.3168/jds.2011-4490 22281352
15. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework. Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA, J Anim Sci 2011 89 2042 2049 10.2527/jas.2010-3297 21357451
16. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys. Rincon G, Weber KL, Van Eenennaam AL, Golden BL, Medrano JF, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 6116 6121 10.3168/jds.2011-4764 22118099
17. The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Boichard D, Maignel L, Verrier E, Genet Sel Evol 1997 29 5 23 10.1186/1297-9686-29-1-5 (Pubitemid 27164276)
18. Pedig: a fortran package for pedigree analysis suited for large populations. Boichard D, Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP):19-23 August 2002; Montpellier CD-ROM communication No. 28-13; 2002
19. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Lund MS, de Roos APW, de Vries AG, Druet T, Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Liu Z, Reents R, Schrooten C, Seefried F, Su G, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 43 10.1186/1297-9686-43-43 22152008
20. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (approximately 54,000) and high-density (approximately 777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. Su G, Brøndum RF, Ma P, Guldbrandtsen B, Aamand GP, Lund MS, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 4657 4665 10.3168/jds.2012-5379 22818480
21. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Allan MF, Heaton MP, O'Connell J, Moore SS, Smith TPL, Sonstegard TS, Van Tassell CP, PLoS One 2009 4 5350 10.1371/journal.pone.0005350 19390634
22. Marker imputation with low-density marker panels in Dutch Holstein cattle. Zhang Z, Druet T, J Dairy Sci 2010 93 5487 5494 10.3168/jds.2010-3501 20965364
23. Danchin-Burge C, Estimation de la variabilité géné tique de 19 races bovines à partir de leurs généalogies Paris: Institut de l'Elevage 2009
24. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Hill WG, Robertson A, Theor Appl Genet 1968 38 226 231 10.1007/BF01245622
25. Linkage disequilibrium and allele-frequency distributions for 114 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in five populations. Goddard KAB, Hopkins PJ, Hall JM, Witte JS, Am J Hum Genet 2000 66 216 234 10.1086/302727 10631153 (Pubitemid 30481485)
26. Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome. Reich DE, Cargill M, Bolk S, Ireland J, Sabeti PC, Richter DJ, Lavery T, Kouyoumjian R, Farhadian SF, Ward R, Lander ES, Nature 2001 411 199 204 10.1038/35075590 11346797 (Pubitemid 32455179)
27. Insights into the genetic history of French cattle from dense SNP data on 47 worldwide breeds. Gautier M, Laloë D, Moazami-Goudarzi K, PLoS One 2010 5 0013038 10.1371/journal.pone.0013038
28. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Daetwyler HD, Kijas JW, Van der Werf JHJ, Anim Genet 2012 43 72 80 22742505
29. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 4114 4129 10.3168/jds.2011-5019 22720968
30. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations. Dassonneville R, Brøndum RF, Druet T, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Ducrocq V, Su G, J Dairy Sci 2011 94 3679 3686 10.3168/jds.2011-4299 21700057