Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 95, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 4657-4665

  Su, G ^a   Brondum R F ^a   Ma, P ^a,b   Guldbrandtsen, B ^a   Aamand, G P ^c   Lund, M S ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Genomic prediction; High density marker panel; Imputation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

BOS;

EID: 84864072672     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: 15253198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5379     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aguilar I., Misztal I., Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S., Lawlor T.J. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:743-752.
2. Browning B.L., Browning S.R. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84:210-223.
3. Chen J., Liu Z., Reinhardt F., Reents R. Reliability of genomic prediction using imputed genotypes for German Holsteins: Illumina 3K to 54K bovine chip. The 2011 Interbull Open Meeting, Stavanger, Norway 2011.
4. Cole J.B., VanRaden P.M., O'Connell J.R., Van Tassell C.P., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Wiggans G.R. Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:2931-2946.
5. Dassonneville R., Brondum R.F., Druet T., Fritz S., Guillaume F., Guldbrandtsen B., Lund M.S., Ducrocq V., Su G. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:3679-3686.
6. de Roos A.P.W., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 2009, 183:1545-1553.
7. de Roos A.P.W., Hayes B.J., Spelman R.J., Goddard M.E. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 2008, 179:1503-1512.
8. Forni S., Aguilar I., Misztal I. Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:1.
9. Gautier M., Faraut T., Moazami-Goudarzi K., Navratil V., Fogfio M., Grohs C., Boland A., Garnier J.G., Boichard D., Lathrop G.M., Gut I.G., Eggen A. Genetic and haplotypic structure in 14 European and African cattle breeds. Genetics 2007, 177:1059-1070.
10. Gengler N., Mayeres P., Szydlowski M. A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: Application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle. Animal 2007, 1:21-28.
11. Goddard M. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 2009, 136:245-257.
12. Habier D., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 2009, 182:343-353.
13. Harris B.L., Johnson D.L. Genomic predictions for New Zealand dairy bulls and integration with national genetic evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:1243-1252.
14. Harris B.L., Johnson D.L. The impact of high density SNP chips on genomic evaluation in dairy cattle. Interbull Bull. 2010, 42:40-43.
15. Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:433-443.
16. Hayes B.J., Visscher P.M., Goddard M.E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2009, 91:47-60.
17. Legarra A., Robert-Granie C., Croiseau P., Guillaume F., Fritz S. Improved Lasso for genomic selection. Genet. Res. (Camb.) 2011, 93:77-87.
18. Liu Z.T., Seefried F.R., Reinhardt F., Rensing S., Thaller G., Reents R. Impacts of both reference population size and inclusion of a residual polygenic effect on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:19.
19. Lund M.S., de Ross S.P., de Vries A.G., Druet T., Ducrocq V., Fritz S., Guillaume F., Guldbrandtsen B., Liu Z., Reents R., Schrooten C., Seefried F., Su G. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:43.
20. Matukumalli L.K., Lawley C.T., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Allan M.F., Heaton M.P., O'Connell J., Moore S.S., Smith T.P.L., Sonstegard T.S., Van Tassell C.P. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e5350.
21. Matukumalli L.K., Schroeder S., DeNise S.K., Sonstegard T., Lawley C.T., Georges N., Coppieters W., Gietzen K., Medrano J.F., Rincon G., Lince D., Eggen A., Glaser L., Cam G., Van Tassel C. Analyzing LD blocks and CNV segments in cattle: Novel genomic features identified using the BovineHD BeadChip. Pub. No. 370-2011-002 2011, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA.
22. Meuwissen T., Goddard M. Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 2010, 185:623-631.
23. Meuwissen T.H.E. Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2009, 41:35.
24. Solberg T.R., Sonesson A.K., Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen T.H.E. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2447-2454.
25. Su G., Guldbrandtsen B., Gregersen V.R., Lund M.S. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:1175-1183.
26. Su G., Madsen P., Nielsen U.S., Mäntysaari E.A., Aamand G.P., Christensen O.F., Lund M.S. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:909-917.
27. Toosi A., Fernando R.L., Dekkers J.C.M. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88:32-46.
28. VanRaden P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91:4414-4423.
29. VanRaden P.M., O'Connell J.R., Wiggans G.R., Weigel K.A. Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2011, 43:10.
30. VanRaden P.M., Sullivan P.G. International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2010, 42:7.
31. VanRaden P.M., Van Tassell C.P., Wiggans G.R., Sonstegard T.S., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F., Schenkel F.S. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:16-24.
32. Villa-Angulo R., Matukumalli L.K., Gill C.A., Choi J., Van Tassell C.P., Grefenstette J.J. High-resolution haplotype block structure in the cattle genome. BMC Genet. 2009, 10:19.
33. Weigel K.A., de los Campos G., Gonzalez-Recio O., Naya H., Wu X.L., Long N., Rosa G.J.M., Gianola D. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5248-5257.