GiraffPlus: Combining social interaction and long term monitoring for promoting independent living

2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 578-585

  Coradeschi, S ^a   Cesta, A ^b   Cortellessa, G ^b   Coraci, L ^b   Gonzalez, J ^c   Karlsson, L ^a   Furfari, F ^d   Loutfi, A ^a   Orlandini, A ^b   Palumbo, F ^d   Pecora, F ^a   Von Rump, S ^e   Stimec, A ^f   Ullberg, J ^a   Otslund, B ^e  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^d ISTI CNR   (Italy)

^e Giraff AB ^*  (Slovenia)

^f LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Artificial Intelligence; Health Care and Assistive Devices; Human Machine Interaction; Smart Homes

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE USER INTERFACE; ASSISTIVE DEVICES; CONTEXT RECOGNITION; HUMAN MACHINE INTERACTION; LONG TERM MONITORING; PERSONALIZED SERVICE; PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SMART HOMES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATION; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; ROBOTS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 84883702479     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HSI.2013.6577883     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Kristoffersson A, Coradeschi S, Loutfi A (2013) A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2013, Article ID 902316, doi:10.1155/2013/902316
2. Lundh R, Karlsson L, Saffiotti A (2008) Autonomous Functional Configuration of a Network Robot System. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 56(10):819-830
3. Lundh R (2009) Robots that Help Each-Other: Self-Configuration of Distributed Robot Systems. PhD Thesis. Örebro University, Sweden
4. Tang F, Parker LE (2005) Distributed multi-robot coalitions through ASyMTRe-D. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Alberta
5. Parker LE, Tang F (2006) Building multi-robot coalitions through automated task solution synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE, special issue on Multi-Robot Systems, 94 (7) pp 1289-1305
6. Patterson D, Fox D, Kautz H, Philipose M (2005) Fine-grained activity recognition by aggregating abstract object usage. Proc. of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers
7. Wu J, Osuntogun A, Choudhury T et al (2007) A Scalable Approach to Activity Recognition Based on Object Use. Proceedings of ICCV 2007. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
8. Goultiaeva A, Lespérance Y. (2007) Incremental plan recognition in an e agent programming framework. Working Notes of the AAAI Workshop on Plan, Activity, and Intention Recognition (PAIR)
9. Jakkula V, Cook D, Crandall A. (2007) Temporal pattern discovery for anomaly detection in a smart home. Proc. of the 3rd IET Conf. on Intelligent Environments (IE), pp. 339-345
10. Ullberg J, Loutfi A, Pecora F (2009) Towards Continuous Activity Monitoring with Temporal Constraints. Proc. of the 4th Workshop on Planning and Plan Execution for Real-World Systems at ICAPS09
11. Pollack M, Brown L, Colbry D et al (2003) Autominder: an intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems (44) pp. 273-282
12. Cesta A, Cortellessa G, Rasconi R et al (2010) Monitoring elderly people with the robocare domestic environment: Interaction synthesis and user evaluation. Computational Intelligence, Special Issue on Scheduling and Planning Applications
13. Coradeschi S, Kristoffersson A, Loutfi A, von Rump S, Cesta A, Cortellessa G. and Gonzalez J (2011). Towards a Methodology for Longitudinal Evaluation of Social Robotic Telepresence for Elderly. 1st Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence, HRI 2011.
14. Kristoffersson A., Severinson Eklundh K, Loutfi A. (2013). Measuring the Quality of Interaction in Mobile Robotic Telepresence: A Pilot's Perspective. In International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol 5, No 1, pp. 89-101, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s12369-012-0166-7.
15. Tiberio L,Padua L,Pellegrino AR, Aprile I, Cortellessa G, Cesta A. Assessing the tolerance of a telepresence robot in users with Mild Cognitive Impairment-A protocol for studying users' physiological response. 1st Workshop on Social Robotic Telepresence held at HRI 2011, March 2011
16. Kristoffersson A., Coradeschi S., Loutfi A, Severinson-Eklundh K. An Exploratory Study of Health Professionals' Attitudes about Robotic Telepresence Technology. In Journal of Technology of Human Services, Vol 29:263-283, 2011. DOI: 10.1080/15228835.2011.639509
17. Graafmans J, Taipale V, Charness N. (eds) (1998) Gerontechnology. A Sustainable Invetsment in the Future. Amsterdam: IOS-Press
18. Sixsmith A, Gutman G (2010) Proceedings of the 7th Gerontechnology Conference
19. The Senior project (2009) Good Practices in e-Inclusion, ethical guidance and designing a dialogue roadmap. A senior project within the seventh framework programme. Deliverable D4.1
20. Oudshoorn N, Pinch T (eds) (2005) How Users Matter. The Co-construction of Users and Technology MIT Press
21. Sinden D, Wister A (2008) E-health promotion for aging baby boomers in North America. Gerontechnology 7 (3) pp.271-278.
22. Dickinson A, Dewsbury G (2006) Designing computer technologies with older people. Gerontechnology (5) 1 pp 1-3
23. Kohlbacher F, Herstatt C (2011) The Silver market Phenomen. Business Opportunities in an Era of Demograhic Change. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
24. Danhauer SC, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA (2005) Positive psychosocial functioning in later life: use of meaning-based coping strategies by nursing home residents. Journal of Applied Gerontology (24) pp. 299-318.
25. Mugge R. (2007) Product attachment. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of industrial design engineering, Department of product innovation and management
26. Schifferstein H., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim E (2008) Consumer-product attachment: Measurement and Design Implications. International Journal of Design, 2(3) pp.1-13.
27. Markussen T (2009) Bloody Roots as Emotional design: How Emotional Structures May Change Expectations of technology Use in Hospitals. International Journal of Design 3 (2) pp.27-39.
28. Turkle Sh (ed) (2007) Evocative objects. Things we think with. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
29. Rubin J, Chisnell D (2008) Handbook of Usability Testing, Second Edition. Wiley
30. Eftring H (1999) The Useworthiness of Robots for People with Physical Disabilities. Doctoral Dissertation 1:1999. Lund University. Department of Design Sciences, Certec.
31. Sorensen K (2005) Domestication: the enactment of technology. Domestication of Media and Technology. Maindenhead: Open University Press, pp. 40-62
32. Silverstone R (2005) Media, technology and everyday life in Europé. Aldershot: Ashgate
33. Dillon A (2001) Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomic. Ed. London: Taylor and Francis, ch. User Acceptance of Information Technology.
34. Davis F (1986) A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T. Boston (MA)
35. Venkatesh V, Morris M G, Davis G B, Davis F (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478
36. Vash C (1983) Psychological Aspects of Rehabilitation Engineering," in Technology for Independent Living. Proceedings from the 1981 Workshops on Science and Technology for Handicapped. AAAS