The effects of fine-scale substratum roughness on diatom community structure in estuarine biofilms

Biofouling

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 879-890

  Sweat, L Holly ^a   Johnson, Kevin B ^a  

^a Florida Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

attachment; biofilms; biofouling; diatoms; substratum roughness

Indexed keywords

BIOFILM; BIOFOULING; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DIATOM; ESTUARINE CHEMISTRY; ROUGHNESS; SPECIES RICHNESS;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; INDIAN RIVER [FLORIDA]; UNITED STATES;

BACILLARIOPHYTA;

ARTICLE; BIOFILM; BIOTA; CHEMISTRY; DIATOM; ESTUARY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SEASON; SEDIMENT; SURFACE PROPERTY; UNITED STATES;

BIOFILMS; BIOTA; DIATOMS; ESTUARIES; FLORIDA; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SEASONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84883657306     PISSN: 08927014     EISSN: 10292454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2013.811492     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Abelson A, Denny M. 1997. Settlement of marine organisms in flow. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 28: 317-339.
2. Aldred N, Scardino A, Cavaco A, de Nys R, Clare AS. 2010. Attachment strength is a key factor in the selection of surfaces by barnacle cyprids (Balanus amphitrite) during settlement. Biofouling. 26: 287-299.
3. Anderson C, Atlar M, Callow M, Candries M, Milne A, Townsin RL. 2003. The development of foul-release coatings for seagoing vessels. J Mar Des Oper. B4: 11-23.
4. Atlar M, Ünal B, Ünal UO, Politis G, Martinelli E, Galli G, Davies C, Williams D. 2013. An experimental investigation of the frictional drag characteristics of nanostructured and fluorinated fouling-release coatings using an axisymmetric body. Biofouling. 29: 39-52.
5. Bakus GJ. 2007. Quantitative analysis of marine biological communities. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons p. 435.
6. Bao WY, Satuito CG, Yang JL, Kitamura H. 2007. Larval settlement and metamorphosis of the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis in response to biofilms. Mar Biol. 150: 565-574.
7. Berntsson KM, Jonsson PR, Lejhall M, Gatenholm P. 2000. Analysis of behavioural rejection of micro-textured surfaces and implications for recruitment by the barnacle Balanus improvisus. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 251: 59-83.
8. Besemer K, Singer G, Limberger R, Chlup A, Hochedlinger G, Hödl I, Baranyi C, Battin TJ. 2007. Biophysical controls on community succession in stream biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 73: 4966-4974.
9. Briand JF, Djeridi I, Jamet D, Coupe S, Bressy C, Molmeret M, Le Berre B, Rimet F, Bouchez A, Blache Y. 2012. Pioneer marine biofilms on artificial surfaces including antifouling coatings immersed in two contrasting French Mediterranean coast sites. Biofouling. 28: 453-463.
10. Cairns J Jr, Plafkin JL, Kaesler RL, Lowe RL. 1983. Early colonization patterns of diatoms and protozoa in fourteen fresh-water lakes. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 30: 47-51.
11. Callow ME, Jennings AR, Brennan AB, Seegert CE, Gibson AL, Wilson L, Feinburg AW, Baney R, Callow JA. 2002. Microtopographic cues for settlement of zoospores of the green fouling algae Enteromorpha. Biofouling. 18: 237-245.
12. Candries M, Atlar M, Guerrero A, Anderson CD. 2001. Lower frictional resistance characteristics of foul release systems. In: Wu Y, Cui W, Zhou G, eds. Practical design of ships and other floating structures. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures; 2001 Sep 16-21 Shanghai, China. New York, NY: Elsevier, 1-8Online copy available at http://www.cehipar.es/files/users/publicaciones/160.pdf.
13. Carl C, Poole AJ, Sexton BA, Glenn FL, Vucko MJ, Williams MR, Whalan S, de Nys R. 2012. Enhancing the settlement and attachment strength of pediveligers of Mytilus galloprovincialis by changing surface wettability and microtopography. Biofouling. 28: 175-186.
14. Cassé F, Swain GW. 2006. The development of microfouling on four commercial coatings under static and dynamic immersion. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 57: 179-185.
15. Clarke KR. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol. 18: 117-143.
16. Cooper SP, Finlay JA, Cone G, Callow ME, Callow JA, Brennan AB. 2011. Engineered antifouling microtopographies: kinetic analysis of the attachment of zoospores of the green alga Ulva to silicone elastomers. Biofouling. 27: 881-892.
17. Crisp DJ, Barnes H. 1954. The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. J Anim Ecol. 23: 142-162.
18. Cumming G, Finch S. 2005. Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am Psychol. 60: 170-180.
19. Dahms HU, Dobretsov S, Qian PY. 2004. The effect of bacterial and diatom biofilms on the settlement of the bryozoan Bugula neritina. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 313: 191-209.
20. Dobretsov S, Abed RMM, Teplitski M. 2013. Mini-review: inhibition of biofouling by marine microorganisms. Biofouling. 28: 423-441.
21. Dobretsov S, Qian PY. 2006. Facilitation and inhibition of larval attachment of the bryozoan Bugula neritina in association with mono-species and multi-species biofilms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 333: 263-274.
22. Dobretsov S, Thomason JC. 2011. The development of marine biofilms on two commercial non-biocidal coatings: a comparison between silicone and fluoropolymer technologies. Biofouling. 27: 869-880.
23. Edgar LA, Pickett-Heaps JD. 1984. Diatom locomotion. Prog Phycol Res. 3: 47-88.
24. Fasham MJR. 1977. A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines, and coenoplanes. Ecology. 58: 551-561.
25. Gadelmawla ES, Koura MM, Maksoud TMA, Elewa IM, Soliman HH. 2002. Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol. 123: 133-145.
26. Genzer J, Efimenko K. 2006. Recent developments in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to marine fouling: a review. Biofouling. 22: 339-360.
27. Hadfield, M. G., Paul, V. J. 2001. Marine chemical ecology. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. Chapter 13, Natural chemical cues for settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae; p. 431-461.
28. Harder T, Lam C, Qian PY. 2002. Induction of larval settlement in the polychaete Hydroides elegans by marine biofilms: an investigation of monospecific diatom films as settlement cues. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 229: 105-112.
29. Hargraves PE. 2002. Diatoms of the Indian River Lagoon, Florida: an annotated account. Fla Sci. 65: 225-244.
30. Herbert RJH, Hawkins SJ. 2006. Effect of rock type on the recruitment and early mortality of the barnacle Chthamalus montagui. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 334: 96-108.
31. Hills JM, Thomason JC. 1998. The effect of scales of surface roughness on the settlement of barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides) cyprids. Biofouling. 12: 57-69.
32. Howell D, Behrends B. 2006. A review of surface roughness in antifouling coatings illustrating the importance of cutoff length. Biofouling. 22: 401-410.
33. Jouuchi T, Satuito CG, Kitamura H. 2007. Sugar compound products of the periphytic diatom Navicula ramosissima induce larval settlement in the barnacle, Amphibalanus amphitrite. Mar Biol. 152: 1065-1076.
34. Kooistra WHCF, De Stefano M, Mann DG, Salma N, Medlin LK. 2003. Phylogenetic position of Toxarium, a pennate-like lineage within centric diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol. 39: 185-197.
35. Krishnan S, Wang N, Ober CK, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA, Hexemer A, Sohn KE, Kramer EJ, Fischer DA. 2006. Comparison of the fouling release properties of hydrophobic fluorinated and hydrophilic PEGylated block copolymer surfaces: attachment strength of the diatom Navicula and the green alga Ulva. Biomacromolecules. 7: 1449-1462.
36. Lam C, Harder T, Qian PY. 2003. Induction of larval settlement in the polychaete Hydroides elegans by surface-associated settlement cues of marine benthic diatoms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 263: 83-92.
37. Lam C, Harder T, Qian PY. 2005. Induction of larval settlement in the polychaete Hydroides elegans by extracellular polymers of benthic diatoms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 286: 145-154.
38. Landoulsi J, Cooksey KE, Dupres V. 2011. Review - interactions between diatoms and stainless steel: focus on biofouling and biocorrosion. Biofouling. 27: 1105-1124.
39. Lavoie I, Dillon PJ, Campeau S. 2009. The effect of excluding diatom taxa and reducing taxonomic resolution on multivariate analyses and stream bioassessment. Ecol Indic. 9: 213-225.
40. López Fuerte FO, Siqueiros Beltrones DA, Navarro JN. 2010. Benthic diatoms associated with mangrove environments in the northwest region of México. La Paz: DR Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO). DR Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur p. 260.
41. Magin CM, Finlay JA, Clay G, Callow ME, Callow JA, Brennan AB. 2011. Antifouling performance of cross-linked hydrogels: refinement of an attachment model. Biomacromolecules. 12: 915-922.
42. Mahr. 2009. MarSurf PS1: absolute mobility for surface roughness measurements. Göttingen: Mahr GmbH p. 12.
43. Mieszkin S, Martin-Tanchereau P, Callow ME, Callow JA. 2012. Effect of bacterial biofilms formed on fouling-release coatings from natural seawater and Cobetia marina, on the adhesion of two marine algae. Biofouling. 28: 953-968.
44. Molino PJ, Campbell E, Wetherbee R. 2009. Development of the initial diatom microfouling layer on antifouling and fouling-release surfaces in temperate and tropical Australia. Biofouling. 25: 685-694.
45. Molino PJ, Hodson OM, Quinn JF, Wetherbee R. 2006. Utilizing QCM-D to characterize the adhesive mucilage secreted by two marine diatom species in situ and in real-time. Biomacromolecules. 7: 3276-3282.
46. Molino PJ, Wetherbee R. 2008. Mini review: the biology of biofouling diatoms and their role in the development of microbial slimes. Biofouling. 24: 365-379.
47. Patil JS, Anil AC. 2005a. Biofilm diatom community structure: influence of temporal and substratum variability. Biofouling. 21: 189-206.
48. Patil JS, Anil AC. 2005b. Influence of diatom exoploymers and biofilms on metamorphosis in the barnacle Balanus amphitrite. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 301: 231-245.
49. Pawlik JR. 1992. Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 30: 273-335.
50. Percival SL, Knapp JS, Edyvean R, Wales DS. 1998. Biofilm development on stainless steel in mains water. Water Res. 32: 243-253.
51. Pomerat CM, Weiss CM. 1946. The influence of texture and composition of surface on the attachment of sedentary marine organisms. Biol Bull. 91: 57-65.
52. Poulsen NC, Spector I, Spurck TP, Schultz TF, Wetherbee R. 1999. Diatom gliding is the result of an actin-myosin motility system. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 44: 23-33.
53. Prentice IC. 1977. Non-metric ordination methods in ecology. J Ecol. 65: 85-94.
54. Rittschof D, Forward RB Jr, Cannon G, Welch JM, McClary M Jr, Holm ER, Clare AS, Conova S, McKelvey LM, Bryan P, van Dover CL. 1998. Cues and context: larval responses to physical and chemical cues. Biofouling. 12: 31-44.
55. Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press p. 747.
56. Saunders RP, Glenn DA. 1969. Memoirs of the hourglass cruises: volume 1, part III: diatoms. Saint Petersburg, FL: Fla Dept Nat Resources Mar Res Lab p. 119.
57. Scardino AJ, de Nys R. 2011. Mini review: biomimetic models and bioinspired surfaces for fouling control. Biofouling. 27: 73-86.
58. Scardino AJ, Guenther J, de Nys R. 2008. Attachment point theory revisited: the fouling response to a microtextured matrix. Biofouling. 24: 45-53.
59. Scardino AJ, Harvey E, de Nys R. 2006. Testing attachment point theory: diatom attachment on microtextured polymide biomimics. Biofouling. 22: 55-60.
60. Schultz MP. 2004. Frictional resistance of antifouling coating systems. J Fluids Eng. 126: 1039-1047.
61. Schultz MP. 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling. 23: 331-341.
62. Schultz MP, Bendick JA, Holm ER, Hertel WM. 2011. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship. Biofouling. 27: 87-98.
63. Schumacher JF, Aldred N, Callow ME, Finlay JA, Callow JA, Clare AS, Brennan AB. 2007. Species-specific engineered antifouling topographies: correlations between the settlement of algal zoospores and barnacle cyprids. Biofouling. 23: 307-317.
64. Swain GW, Kovach B, Touzot A, Cassé F, Kavanagh CJ. 2007. Measuring the performance of today's antifouling coatings. J Ship Prod. 23: 164-170.
65. Tang L, Pillai S, Revsbech NP, Schramm A, Bischoff C, Meyer RL. 2011. Biofilm retention on surfaces with variable roughness and hydrophobicity. Biofouling. 27: 111-121.
66. Thiyagarajan V. 2010. A review on the role of chemical cues in habitat selection by barnacles: new insights from larval proteomics. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 392: 22-36.
67. Tomas CR. 1997. Identifying marine phytoplankton. San Diego, CA: Academic Press p. 858.
68. Vinyard WC. 1979. Diatoms of North America. Eureka, CA: Mad River Press p. 119.
69. Wetherbee R, Lind JL, Burke J, Quatrano RS. 1998. Minireview: the first kiss: establishment and control of initial adhesion by raphid diatoms. J Phycol. 34: 9-15.
70. Woods DC, Fletcher RL, Jones EBG. 1986. Diatom fouling of in-service shipping with particular reference to the influence of hydrodynamic forces. In: Round FE, ed. Proceedings of the 9th International Diatom Symposium; 1986 Aug 24-30. Bristol, UK: Biopress, 49-59.
71. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. 2004. Antifouling technology - past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coat. 50: 75-104.
72. Zargiel KA, Coogan JS, Swain GW. 2011. Diatom community structure on commercially available ship hull coatings. Biofouling. 27: 955-965.
73. Zobell CE, Allen EC. 1935. The significance of marine bacteria in the fouling of submerged surfaces. J Bacteriol. 29: 239-251.