Informed consent for web paradata use

Survey Research Methods

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 57-67

  Couper, Mick P ^a   Singer, Eleanor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Paradata; Web surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883649423     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18643361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2010). The Code of Professional Ethics and Practices. Deerfield, IL: AAPOR.
2. Baker, R. P., & Couper, M. P. (2007). The Impact of Screen Size and Background Color on Response inWeb Surveys. Paper presented at the General Online Research conference (GOR07), Leipzig, Germany.
3. Bates, N. A. (2005). Development and Testing of Informed Consent Questions to Link Survey Data with Administrative Records. Proceedings of the AAPOR-ASA Section on Survey Methods Research. Washington DC: American Statistical Association, pp. 3786-3792.
4. Callegaro, M. (2010). Do You Know Which Device Your Respondent Has Used to Take Your Online Survey? Using Paradata to Collect Information on Device Type. Survey Practice.
5. Callegaro, M. (2012). A Taxonomy of Paradata for Web Surveys and Computer Assisted Self Interviewing. Poster presented at the General Online Research Conference, Mannheim, Germany, March.
6. Callegaro, M., & DiSogra, C. (2008). Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 1008-1032.
7. Callegaro, M., Yang, Y., Bhola, D. S., Dillman, D. A., & Chin, T.-Y. (2009). Response Latency as an Indicator of Optimizing in Online Questionnaires. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 103, 10-25.
8. Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO). (2011). Code of Standards and Ethics for Survey Research. Port Jefferson, NY: CASRO.
9. Couper, M. P. (1998). Measuring Survey Quality in a CASIC Environment. Invited paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Dallas, August.
10. Couper, M. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2005). The Use of Paradata in Survey Research. Proceedings of the 55th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Sydney, Australia, April [CD].
11. Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Conrad, F. G., & Groves, R. M. (2008). Risk of Disclosure, Perceptions of Risk, and Concerns about Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 24(2), 255-275.
12. Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Conrad, F. G., & Groves, R. M. (2010). An Experimental Study of Disclosure Risk, Disclosure Harm, Incentives, and Survey Participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 26(2), 287-300.
13. Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R., & Conrad, F. G. (2006). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visual Analog Scales: A Web Experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 227-245.
14. Dahlhamer, J. M., & Cox, C. S. (2007). Respondent Consent to Link Survey Data with Administrative Records: Results from a Splitballot Field Test with the 2007 National Health Interview Survey. Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Meeting, Washington, DC.
15. ESOMAR. (2011). ESOMAR Guideline for Online Research. http://www.esomar.org/knowledge-and-standards/codes-andguidelines /guideline-for-online-research.php.
16. ESOMAR. (2012). ESOMAR Practical Guide on Cookies. http://www.esomar.org/uploads/public/knowledge and standards/codes and guidelines/ESOMAR Practical Guide on Cookies July 2012.pdf.
17. Fulton, J. (2012). Respondent Consent to Use Administrative Data. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Joint Program in Survey Methodology, PhD dissertation.
18. Groves, R. M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. (2000). Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation-Description and an illustration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 299-308.
19. Haraldsen, G., Kleven, Ø., & Stålnacke, M. (2006). Paradata Indications of Problems in Web Surveys. Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics, Cardiff, Wales, April.
20. Heerwegh, D. (2003). Explaining Response Latencies and Changing Answers Using Client-Side Paradata from a Web Survey. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 360-373.
21. Heerwegh, D. (2011). Internet Survey Paradata. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social Research and the Internet (p. 325-348). New York: Taylor and Francis.
22. Kreuter, F., Couper, M. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2010). The Use of Paradata to Monitor and Manage Survey Data Collection. Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver, August, pp. 282-296.
23. McClain, C., & Crawford, S. D. (2011). Web Survey Live Validations What Are They Doing? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Phoenix, AZ.
24. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
25. Pascale, J. (2011). Requesting Consent to Link Survey Data to Administrative Records: Results from a Split-Ballot Experiment in the Survey of Health Insurance and Program Participation (SHIPP). Survey Methodology Study Series #2011-03. Washington, DC: Center for Survey Measurement, Research and Methodology Directorate, US Census Bureau.
26. Sakshaug, J., & Kreuter, F. (2012). Assessing the magnitude of nonconsent biases in linked survey and administrative data. Survey Research Methods, 6(2), 113-122.
27. Singer, E. (2011). Toward a Benefit-Cost Theory of Survey Participation: Evidence, Further Tests, and Implications. Journal of Official Statistics, 27(2), 379-392.
28. Singer, E., & Couper, M. P. (2010). Communicating Disclosure Risk in Informed Consent Statements. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 1-8.
29. Singer, E., & Couper, M. P. (2011). Ethical Considerations in Web Surveys. In M. Das, P. Ester, & L. Kaczmirek (Eds.), Social Research and the Internet (p. 133-162). New York: Taylor and Francis.
30. Stern, M. J. (2008). The Use of Client-Side Paradata in Analyzing the Effects of Visual Layout on Changing Responses inWeb Surveys. Field Methods, 20(4), 377-398.
31. Stieger, S., & Reips, U.-D. (2010). What Are Participants Doing While Filling in an Online Questionnaire: A Paradata Collection Tool and an Empirical Study. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1488-1495.
32. Yan, T., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Fast Times and Easy Questions: The Effects of Age, Experience and Question Complexity on Web Survey Response Times. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 51-68.