Ethical considerations in internet surveys

Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 133-162

  Singer, Eleanor ^a   Couper, Mick P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85129939567     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Abraham, M., Meierhoefer, C., & Lipsman, A. (2007). The impact of cookie deletion on the accuracy of site-server and ad-server metrics: An empirical comScore study. Reston, VA: comScore.
2. Association of Internet Researchers. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. Milwaukee, WI: AoIR. Retrieved from www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
3. Baker, R. P. & Couper, M. P. (2007). The impact of screen size and background color on response in Web surveys. Paper presented at the General Online Research conference (GOR '07), Leipzig, Germany.
4. Corning, A. & Singer, E. (2003). Survey of U.S. privacy attitudes. Report prepared for the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Academy of Sciences.
5. Council of American Survey Research Organizations (CASRO). (2008). Code of standards and ethics for survey research. Port Jefferson, NY: CASRO.
6. Couper, M. P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464-494.
7. Couper, M. P. (2007). Whither the Web: Web 2.0 and the changing world of Web surveys. In M. Trotman, T. Burrell, L. Gerrard et al. (Eds.), The challenges of a changing world: Proceedings of the fifth international conference of the Association for Survey Computing (pp. 7-16). Berkeley, UK: ASC.
8. Couper, M. P. (2008). Designing effective Web surveys. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Couper, M. P. & Lyberg, L. E. (2005). The use of paradata in survey research. In Proceedings of the 55th Session of the International Statistical Institute [CD]. Sydney, Australia: ISI.
10. Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Conrad, F. G., & Groves, R. M. (2008). Risk of disclosure, perceptions of risk, and concerns about privacy and confidentiality as factors in survey participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 24(2), 255-275.
11. Couper, M., Singer, E., Conrad, F. G., & Groves, R. M. (2010). An experimental study of disclosure risk, disclosure harm, incentives, and survey participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 26(2), in press.
12. Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Tourangeau, R., & Conrad, F. G. (2006). Evaluating the effectiveness of visual analog scales: A Web experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 227-245.
13. Downes-Le Guin, T., Mechling, J., & Baker, R. P. (2006). Great results from ambiguous sources: Cleaning Web panel data. In Proceedings of ESOMAR World Research Conference, Panel Research [CD] (pp. 285-293). Barcelona, Spain: ESOMAR.
14. ESOMAR (2008). Conducting market and opinion research using the Web. Amsterdam: ESOMAR. Retrieved from http://www.esomar.org/index.php/codes-guidelines.html
15. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (2007). Online behavioral advertising: Moving the discussion forward to possible self-regulatory principles. Retrieved from http://www.ftc.gov/os/2007/12/P859900stmt.pdf
16. Fox, S. (2000). Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
17. Fox, S. (2005). Spyware: The threat of unwanted software programs is changing the way people use the Internet. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
18. Fox, S. & Lewis, O. (2001). Fear of online crime: Americans support FBI interception of criminal suspects' e-mail and new laws to protect online privacy. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org
19. Frankel, M. S. & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet: A report of a workshop June 10-11. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
20. Heerwegh, D. (2003). Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client-side paradata from a Web survey. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 360-373.
21. Hillygus, D. S., Nie, N. H., Prewitt, K., & Pals, H. (2006). The hard count. New York: Russell Sage.
22. Jupiter Research. (2005). Accurate Web site visitor measurement crippled by cookie blocking and deletion. New York: Jupitermedia Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.jupiter-media.com/corporate/press.html
23. Kaczmirek, L. & Thiele, O. (2006). Flash, JavaScript, or PHP? Comparing the availability of technical equipment among university applicants. Paper presented at the General Online Research conference (GOR '06), Bielefeld, Germany.
24. Klang, M. (2004). Spyware-the ethics of covert action. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 193-202.
25. Kraut, R. M., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs' Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 106-117.
26. Lozar Manfreda, K. & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys. In E. D. De Leeuw, J. J. Hox, & D. A. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 264-284). European Association of Methodology Series. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Marketing Research Association. (2000). Use of the Internet for conducting opinion and marketing research: Ethical guidelines. Glastonbury, CT: Marketing Research Association. Retrieved from http://www.imro.org/pdf/Internet%20guidelines%20for%20web.pdf
28. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29. National Research Council. (1979). Privacy and confidentiality as factors in survey response. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30. National Research Council. (2006). Expanding access to research data: Reconciling risks and opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Regan, K. (2005). Web analytics industry confronts cookie-deletion trend. E-Commerce Times. Retrieved from http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/43284.html
32. Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Seastrom, M. (2008). The impact of privacy breaches on survey participation in a national longitudinal survey. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Denver, Colorado.
34. Singer, E. (1978). Informed consent: Consequences for response rate and response quality in social surveys. American Sociological Review, 43(2), 144-162.
35. Singer, E. (2003). Exploring the meaning of consent: Participation in research and beliefs about risks and benefits. Journal of Official Statistics, 19(3), 273-285.
36. Singer, E. & Couper, M. P. (2008). Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(3), 49-56.
37. Singer, E., Hippler, H.-J., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Confidentiality assurances in surveys: Reassurance or threat? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 256-268.
38. Singer, E., Mathiowetz, N., & Couper, M. P. (1993). The role of privacy and confidentiality as factors in response to the 1990 census. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 465-482.
39. Singer, E., Van Hoewyk, J., & Neugebauer, R. (2003). Attitudes and behavior: The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on participation in the 2000 census. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 368-384.
40. Singer, E., Von Thurn, D. R., & Miller, E. R. (1995). Confidentiality assurances and response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 66-77.
41. Stern, M. J. (2008). The use of client-side paradata in analyzing the effects of visual layout on changing responses in Web surveys. Field Methods, 20(4), 377-398.
42. Stieger, S. (2004). What the h ... are they doing? What are respondents doing while filling in an online questionnaire. Paper presented at the General Online Research conference (GOR '04), Duisburg, Germany.
43. Thiele, O. & Kaczmirek, L. (2010). Security and data protection: Collection, storage, and feedback in Web research. In S. D. Gosling & J. A. Johnson (Eds.), Advanced methods for behavioral research on the Web. (pp. 235-253). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44. Turow, J. (2003). Americans and online privacy: The system is broken. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/jturow/internet-privacy-report/36-page-turow-version-9.pdf
45. Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel (1973). Final report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
46. Walther, J. B. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 205-216.
47. Whitehead, L. C. (2007). Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: An integrated review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 65(4), 782-791.
48. Yan, T. & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Fast times and easy questions: The effects of age, experience and question complexity on Web survey response times. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 51-68.
49. Zayatz, L. (2007). Disclosure avoidance practices and research at the U.S. Census Bureau: An update. Paper presented at the workshop on Ensuring Data Access and Confidentiality Protection for Highly Sensitive Data, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.