Internet survey paradata

Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 325-348

  Heerwegh, Dirk ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85129979675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. AAPOR. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (5th ed.). Lenexa, KS: AAPOR. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/uploads/Standard_Definitions_07_08_Final.pdf
2. Bassili, J. N. (2000). Editor's introduction: Reflection on response latency measurement in telephone surveys. Political Psychology, 21(1), 1-6.
3. Bassili, J. N. & Fletcher, J. F. (1991). Response-time measurement in survey research: A method for CATI and a new look at nonattitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(3), 331-346.
4. Bosnjak, M. & Tuten, T. L. (2001). Classifying response behaviors in Web-based surveys. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(3). Retrieved from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/boznjak.html
5. Christian, L. M. & Dillman, D. A. (2004). The influence of graphical and symbolic language manipulations on responses to self-administered questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 57-80.
6. Conrad, F. G., Tourangeau, R., Couper, M. P., & Kennedy, C. (2008). Interactive interventions in Web surveys can improve data quality. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Social Science Methodology, Naples, Italy.
7. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
8. Couper, M. P. (2000). Usability evaluation of computer-assisted survey instruments. Social Science Computer Review, 18(4), 384-396.
9. Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition and Emotion, 15(2), 115-141.
10. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Haraldsen, G. (2004). Identifying and reducing response burdens in Internet business surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(2), 393-410.
12. Heerwegh, D. (2003). Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client-side paradata from a Web survey. Social Science Computer Review, 21(3), 360-373.
13. Heerwegh, D. (2004). Uses of client side paradata in Web surveys. Paper presented at the international symposium in honor of Paul Lazarsfeld, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0034437/public/papers.htm
14. Heerwegh, D. (n.d.). The CSP Project. Retrieved from https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0034437/public/csp.htm
15. Johnson, M. (2004). Timepieces, components of survey question response latencies. Political Psychology, 25(5), 679-702.
16. Kaczmirek, L. (2008). Human-survey interaction: Usability and nonresponse in online surveys. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Mannheim. Retrieved from http://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/madoc/volltexte/2008/2150
17. Krosnick, J. A. & Abelson, R. P. (1992). The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 177-203). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
18. Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Berent, M. K., Carson, R. T., Hanemann, W. M., Kopp, R. J. et al. (2002). The impact of "no opinion" response options on data quality: Non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 371-403.
19. Krosnick, J. A. & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Murphy, K. R., Myors, B., & Wolach, A. (2009). Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. New York: Routledge.
21. Peytchev, A., Couper, M. P., McCabe, S. E., & Crawford, S. D. (2006). Web survey design: Paging versus scrolling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(4), 596-607.
22. Peytchev, A., & Crawford, S. D. (2005). A typology of real-time validations in Web-based surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 23(2), 235-249.
23. Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. et al. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109-130.
24. Sniderman, P. M., Tetlock, P. E., & Elms, L. (2001). Public opinion and democratic politics: The problem of nonattitudes and the social construction of political judgment. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 254-288). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Stern, M. J. (2008). The use of client-side paradata in analyzing the effects of visual layout on changing responses in Web surveys. Field Methods, 20(4), 377-398.
26. Stern, M. J., Dillman, D. A., & Smyth, J. D. (2007). Visual design, order effects, and respondent characteristics in a self-administered survey. Survey Research Methods, 1(3), 121-138.
27. Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. A. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. London: Sage.
29. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.