Revisiting multi-subject random effects in fMRI: Advocating prevalence estimation

NeuroImage

Volumn 84, Issue , 2014, Pages 113-121

  Rosenblatt, J D ^a   Vink, M ^b   Benjamini, Y ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

FMRI; Gaussian mixture; Group studies; Localization; Random effects; Statistical inference

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; GAUSSIAN MIXTURE RANDOM EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TASK PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84883647801     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Benjamini Y. Is the t test really conservative when the parent distribution is long-tailed?. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1983, 78(383):645-654. (September).
2. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1995, 57:289-300.
3. Cai T.T., Jin J., Low M.G. Estimation and confidence sets for sparse normal mixtures. Ann. Stat. 2007, 35(6):2421-2449. (December, ISSN 0090-5364).
4. Clayden J.D., Muñoz Maniega S., Storkey A.J., King M.D., Bastin M.E., Clark C.A. TractoR: magnetic resonance imaging and tractography with R. J. Stat. Softw. 2011, 44(8):1-18. (10, ISSN 1548-7660).
5. Delmas C. On likelihood ratio tests in Gaussian mixture models. Sankhya: Indian J. Stat. (2003-2007) 2003, 65(3):513-531. ISSN 09727671.
6. Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Methodol. 1977, 39(1):1-38. (ISSN 00359246).
7. Donoho D., Jin J. Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures. Ann. Stat. 2004, 32(3):962-994.
8. Fedorenko E., Hsieh P.J., Nieto-Castanon A., Whitfield-Gabrieli S., Kanwisher N. New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104(2):1177-1194. (August, ISSN 0022-3077, 1522-1598).
9. Friston Karl Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers. NeuroImage 2012, 61(4):1300-1310.
10. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J., Poline J.-P., Frith C.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1994, 2(4):189-210. (ISSN 1097-0193).
11. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J. How many subjects constitute a study?. NeuroImage 1999, 10(1):1-5. (July, ISSN 1053-8119).
12. Friston K.J., Penny W., Phillips C., Kiebel S., Hinton G., Ashburner J. Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory. NeuroImage 2002, 16(2):465-483. (June, ISSN 1053-8119).
13. Garel B. Recent asymptotic results in testing for mixtures. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2007, 51(11):5295-5304. (July, ISSN 0167-9473).
14. Heller R., Golland Y., Malach R., Benjamini Y. Conjunction group analysis: an alternative to mixed/random effect analysis. NeuroImage 2007, 37(4):1178-1185. (October, ISSN 1053-8119).
15. Lehmann Erich L. Parametric versus nonparametrics: two alternative methodologies. J. Nonparametr. Stat. 2009, 21(4):397-405. (ISSN 1048-5252).
16. Mumford J.A., Nichols T. Simple group fMRI modeling and inference. NeuroImage 2009, 47(4):1469-1475. (October, ISSN 1053-8119).
17. R Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, (URL http://www.R-project.org/).
18. Raemaekers M., Vink M., Zandbelt B., van Wezel R.J.A., Kahn R.S., Ramsey N.F. Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades. NeuroImage 2007, 36(3):532-542. (July, ISSN 1053-8119).
19. Raemaekers M., du Plessis S., Ramsey N.F., Weusten J.M.H., Vink M. Test-retest variability underlying fMRI measurements. NeuroImage 2012, 60(1):717-727. (March, ISSN 1095-9572, PMID: 22155027).
20. Roche A., Mariaux S., Keller M., Thirion B. Mixed-effect statistics for group analysis in fMRI: a nonparametric maximum likelihood approach. NeuroImage 2007, 38(3):501-510. (ISSN 1053-8119).
21. Rosenblatt J.D., Benjamini Y. Another argument in favour of Wilcoxon's signed rank test 2013, (Submitted. Under review).
22. Sabuncu M.R., Singer B.D., Conroy B., Bryan R.E., Ramadge P.J., Haxby J.V. Function-based Intersubject alignment of human cortical anatomy. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 20(1):130-140. (January 1). 10.1093/cercor/bhp085.
23. Saxe R., Brett M., Kanwisher N. Divide and conquer: a defense of functional localizers. NeuroImage 2006, 30(4):1088-1096. (May, ISSN 1053-8119).
24. Theußl S., Zeileis A. Collaborative software development using R-Forge. The R Journal 2009, 1(1):9-14. (May).
25. Thirion B., Pinel P., Mriaux S., Roche A., Dehaene S., Poline J.B. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. NeuroImage 2007, 35(1):105-120. (March, ISSN 1053-8119).
26. Thyreau B., Schwartz Y., Thirion B., Frouin V., Loth E., Vollstädt-Klein S., Paus T., Artiges E., Conrod P.J., Schumann G., Whelan R., Poline J.B. Very large fMRI study using the IMAGEN database: sensitivity-specificity and population effect modeling in relation to the underlying anatomy. NeuroImage 2012, 61(1):295-303. (May, ISSN 1095-9572).
27. van Buuren M., Gladwin T.E., Zandbelt B.B., Kahn R.S., Vink M. Reduced functional coupling in the default mode network during self-referential processing. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31(8):1117-1127. (August).
28. van Buuren M., Vink M., Rapcencu A.E., Kahn R.S. Exaggerated brain activation during emotion processing in unaffected siblings of patients with schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 70(1):81-87. (July).
29. Woolrich M. Robust group analysis using outlier inference. NeuroImage 2008, 41(2):286-301. (June, ISSN 1053-8119).
30. Worsley K.J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Vandal A.C., Friston K.J., Evans A.C. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1996, 4(1):58-73.
31. Worsley K.J., Liao C.H., Aston J., Petre V., Duncan G.H., Morales F., Evans A.C. A general statistical analysis for fMRI data. NeuroImage 2002, 15(1):1-15. (January, ISSN 1053-8119).
32. Xu L., Johnson T.D., Nichols T.E., Nee D.E. Modeling inter-subject variability in fMRI activation location: a Bayesian hierarchical spatial model. Biometrics 2009, 65(4):1041-1051. (December, ISSN 1541-0420).
33. Zandbelt B.B., van Buuren M., Kahn R.S., Vink M. Reduced proactive inhibition in schizophrenia is related to corticostriatal dysfunction and poor working memory. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 70(12):1151-1158. (December, ISSN 1873-2402).