Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers

NeuroImage

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1300-1310

  Friston, Karl ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST CENTRE FOR NEUROIMAGING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classical inference; Effect size; Power; Sample size; Statistical testing

Indexed keywords

CLASSICAL INFERENCE; EFFECT SIZE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; NEUROIMAGING; NOTE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

NEUROIMAGING; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84861331040     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.018     Document Type: Note

References (23)

1. Brand A., Bradley M.T., Best L.A., Stoica G. Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological research. Percept. Mot. Skills 2008, 106(2):645-649.
2. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Academic Press, New York, New York. 2nd ed.
3. Desu M.M., Raghavarao D. Sample-size Methodology 1990, Academic Press, Boston.
4. Ferguson C.J. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2009, 40(5):532-538.
5. Fisher A.Z., Student S.T. A triple dissociation of neural systems supporting ID, EGO, and SUPEREGO. Psyence 2012, 335:1669.
6. Friston K.J., Holmes A.P., Worsley K.J. How many subjects constitute a study?. Neuroimage 1999, 10(1):1-5.
7. Friston K.J., Glaser D.E., Henson R.N., Kiebel S., Phillips C., Ashburner J. Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications. Neuroimage 2002, 16(2):484-512. Jun.
8. Friston K.J., Stephan K.E., Lund T.E., Morcom A., Kiebel S. Mixed-effects and fMRI studies. Neuroimage 2005, 24(1):244-252.
9. Holmes A., Friston K. Generalisability, random effects and population inference. NeuroImage 1998, 7:S754.
10. Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005, 2(8)(e124):696-701.
11. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S., Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12(5):535-540.
12. Lenth R.V. Some practical guidelines for effective sample-size. Determin. Am. Stat. 2001, 55(3):187-193.
13. Lindley D.V. A statistical paradox. Biometrika 1957, 44:187-192.
14. Lipsey M.W. Design Sensitivity: Statistical Power for Experimental Research 1990, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
15. Lohrenz T., McCabe K., Camerer C.F., Montague P.R. Neural signature of fictive learning signals in a sequential investment task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104(22):9493-9498.
16. Maxwell S.E., Kelley K., Rausch J.R. Sample-size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008, 59:537-563. Review.
17. Odeh R.E., Fox M. Sample-size Choice: Charts for Experiments with Linear Models 1991, Marcel Dekker, New York. 2nd ed.
18. Senn S.J. Two cheers for P-values. J. Epidemiol. Biostat. 2001, 6:193-204.
19. Shuster J.J. CRC Handbook of Sample-size Guidelines for Clinical Trials 1990, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
20. Simon R. How large should a phase II trial of a new drug be?. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1987, 71(11):1079-1085.
21. Vul E., Harris C.R., Winkielman P., Pashler H. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 4(3):274-290.
22. Wilkinson L., APA Task Force on Statistical Inference Statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and explanations. Am. Psychol. 1999, 54(8):594-604.
23. Zimmerman D.W. A Note on the Influence of Outliers on Parametric and Nonparametric Tests. J. Gen. Psychol. 1994, 121(4):391-402.