Introduction to special issue on alternatives to lecture in the computer science classroom

ACM Transactions on Computing Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Grissom, Scott ^a  

^a GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Collaborative learning; Computer science education; Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION; INQUIRY-BASED PEDAGOGY; INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES; MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS; NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS; PEDAGOGY;

STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 84883570726     PISSN: 19466226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2499947.2499948     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. ARONSON, E. AND PATNOE, S. 2010. The Jigsaw Classroom: Building Cooperation in the Classroom, 3rd Ed. Pinter and Martin.
2. BAILEY-LEE, C., PORTER, L., AND GARCIA, S. 2013. Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses? ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3, Article 12.
3. BECK, L. AND CHIZHIK, A. 2013. Cooperative learning instructional methods for cs1: Design, implementation and evaulation. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3, Article 10.
4. BERGMANN, J. AND SAMS, A. 2012. Flip Your Classroom: Talk to Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
5. BONWELL, C. C. AND EISON, J. A. 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Tech. rep. 1, ASHRE ERIC Higher Education, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
6. COLEMAN, B. AND LANG, M. 2012. Collaboration across the curriculum: A disciplined approach to developing team skills. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'12). ACM Press, New York, 277-282.
7. CROUCH, C. AND MAZUR, E. 2001. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience. Amer. J. Phys. 69, 9, 970-977.
8. FELDER, R. M. AND BRENT, R. 2009. Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Educ. Brief, 2, 4.
9. GREENBERG, S. 2009. Embedding a design studio course in a conventional computer science program. In Creativity and HCI: From Experience to Design in Education, P. Kotze, W. Wong, J. Jorge, A. Dix, and P. A. Silva, Eds., Springer, 23-41.
10. HAKE, R. R. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Amer. J. Phys. 66, 1, 64-74.
11. HU, H. AND KUSSMAUL, C. 2012. Promoting student centered learning with pogil. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'12). ACM Press, New York, 579-580.
12. HU, H. AND SHEPERD, T. 2013. Using pogil to help students learn to program. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3, Article 13.
13. HUNHAUSEN, C., AGRAWAL, A., AND PAWAN, A. 2013. Talking about code: Integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3, Article 14.
14. KUSSMAUL, C. 2012. Process oriented guided inquiry learning (pogil) for computer science. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE'12). ACM Press, New York, 373-378.
15. MOOG, R. AND SPENCER, J. 2008. POGIL: An overview. In Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: ACS Symposium Series 994, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1-13.
16. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). 2011. Promising Practices in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education: Summary of Two Workshops. The National Academies Press, Washington. DC
17. NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). 2012. Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.
18. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF).2013. Widening implementation and demonstration of evidence-based reforms (wider). Program Solicitation, NSF 13-552.
19. PORTER, L., BAILEY-LEE, C., SIMON, B., AND ZINGARO, D. 2011. Do students really learn from peer instruction in computing? In Proceedings of the 7th International Computing Education Research Workshop. ACM Press, New York.
20. PRESIDENT'S COUNCIL OF ADVISORS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (PCAST). 2012. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Executive Office of the U.S. President.
21. PRINCE, M. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Engin. Educ. 93, 3, 223-231.
22. REIMER, Y. J. AND DOUGLAS, S. A. 2003. Teaching hci design with the studio approach. Comput. Sci. Educ. 13, 3, 191-205.
23. RENAUD, K. AND CUTTS, Q. 2013. Teaching human-centered security using non-traditional techniques. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 13, 3, Article 11.
24. SIMON B., KOHANFARS, M., LEE, J., TAMAYO, K., AND CUTTS, Q. 2010. Experience report: Peer instruction in introductory computing. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 42, 2, 341-345.