Balancing the trade-off between learning prospects and spillover risks: MNC subsidiaries' vertical linkage patterns in developed countries

Journal of World Business

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 503-514

  Perri, Alessandra ^a,b   Andersson, Ulf ^c   Nell, Phillip C ^c   Santangelo, Grazia D ^d  

^a CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE   (Italy)

^b DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION   (Spain)

^c Department of Strategic Management and Globalization ^*  (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Competitive pressure; Learning; Quality of local vertical linkages; Spillovers; Subsidiary capabilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883552780     PISSN: 10909516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. Aitken B.J., Harrison A.E. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 1999, 89(3):605-618.
2. Alcácer J. Location choices across the value chain: How activity and capability influence collocation. Management Science 2006, 52(10):1457-1471.
3. Alcácer J., Chung W. Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science 2007, 53(5):760-776.
4. Almeida P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 17(Winter Special Issue):155-165.
5. Almeida P., Phene A. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal 2004, 25(8-9):847-864.
6. Anderson J.C., Håkansson H., Johanson J. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58(4):1-15.
7. Andersson U., Björkman I., Forsgren M. Managing subsidiary knowledge creation. The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review 2005, 14(5):521-538.
8. Andersson U., Forsgren M., Holm U. The strategic impact of external networks - Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23(11):979-996.
9. Arikan A.T. Inter-firm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Academy of Management Review 2009, 34:658-676.
10. Astley W.G. Towards an appreciation of collective strategy. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9(3):526-535.
11. Astley W.G., Fombrun C.J. Collective strategy: Social ecology of organizational environments. Academy of Management Review 1983, 8:576-587.
12. Barney J.B. Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?. Academy of Management Review 1986, 11:656-665.
13. Baum J., Haveman H. Love thy neighbor? Differentiation and agglomeration in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly 1997, 42(2):304-338.
14. Belderbos R., Capannelli G., Fukao K. Backward vertical linkages of foreign manufacturing affiliates: Evidence from Japanese multinationals. World Development 2001, 29(1):189-208.
15. Bell M., Pavitt K. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Technology, globalisation and economic performance 1997, 83-137. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. D. Archibugi, J. Michie (Eds.).
16. Birkinshaw J., Hood N. Multinational subsidiary development: Capability evolution and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(4):773-795.
17. Blanc C., Sierra H. The internationalisation of R&D by multinationals: A trade-off between external and internal proximity. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1999, 23:187-206.
18. Blomström M. Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of Mexico. Journal of Industrial Economics 1986, 35:97-112.
19. Blomström M., Kokko A. Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Survey 1998, 12(3):247-278.
20. Blomström, M., Kokko, A., & Zejan, M. (1992). Host country competition and technology transfer by multinationals (NBER Working Paper No. 4131).
21. Boone J. Competitive pressure: The effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 2000, 31(3):549-569.
22. Boyd B.K., Dess G.G., Rasheed A.M.A. Divergence between perceptual and archival measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review 1993, 18(2):204-226.
23. Brass D.J., Galaskiewicz H., Greve H.R., Wenpin T. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 2004, 47(6):795-817.
24. Buckley P.J., Casson M.C. The future of the multinational enterprise 1976, Homes & Meier, London.
25. Calantone R.J., Di Benedetto C.A. An integrative model of new product development process: An empirical validation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1988, 5(3):201-215.
26. Cantwell J.A. Technological innovation and multinational corporation 1989, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
27. Cantwell J.A., Santangelo G.D. The new geography of corporate research in information and communications technology (ICT). Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2002, 12(1-2):163-197.
28. Cassiman B., Veugelers R. Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy 1999, 28(1):63-80.
29. Castellani D. Firms' technological trajectories and the creation of foreign subsidiaries. International Journal of Applied Economics 2002, 16(3):359-371.
30. Castellani D., Zanfei A. Multinational firms, innovation and productivity 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
31. Caves R.E. Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets. Economica 1974, 41:176-193.
32. Chen H., Chen T.J. Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 1998, 29(3):445-468.
33. Chen T.J., Chen H., Ku Y.H. Foreign direct investment and local linkages. Journal of International Business Studies 2004, 35(4):320-333.
34. Cooke P. Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 2001, 10(4):945-974.
35. Cool K., Dierickx I. Rivalry, strategic groups and firm profitability. Strategic Management Journal 1993, 14(1):47-59.
36. Dacin T.M., Ventresca M.J., Beal B.D. The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue and direction. Journal of Management 1999, 25(3):317-356.
37. De Faria P., Sofka W. Knowledge protection strategies of multinational firms - A cross-country comparison. Research Policy 2010, 39(7):956-968.
38. Deiaco E. New views on innovative activity and technological performance: The Swedish Innovation Survey. STI Review 1992, 11:35-62.
39. De Melto, D., McMullen K., & Wills R. (1980). Innovation and technological change in five Canadian industries (Discussion Paper No. 176). Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.
40. Dyer J., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(4):660-679.
41. Driffield N., Love J. Foreign direct investment, technology sourcing and reverse spillovers. The Manchester School 2003, 71(6):659-673.
42. Driffield N., Munday M., Roberts A. Foreign direct investment, transactional linkages, and the performance of the domestic sector. International Journal of the Economics of Business 2002, 9(3):335-351.
43. Driffield N., Noor A.H.M. Foreign direct investment and local input linkages in Malaysia. Transnational Corporations 1999, 8:1-24.
44. Duanmu J.L., Fai F.M. A processual analysis of knowledge transfer: From foreign MNEs to Chinese suppliers. International Business Review 2007, 16(4):449-473.
45. Dunning J.H. Explaining changing patterns of international production: In defence of the eclectic theory. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1979, 41(4):269-295.
46. Dunning J.H. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies 1980, 11(1):9-31.
47. Dunning J.H. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy 1994, 23(1):67-88.
48. Dunning J.H. Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in the age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies 1995, 26:461-491.
49. Findlay R. Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment and the transfer of technology: A Simple dynamic model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1978, 92:1-16.
50. Forsgren M., Holm U., Johanson J. Managing the embedded multinational - A business network perspective 2005, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
51. Frost T., Birkinshaw J., Ensign P.C. Centres of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 2002, 23(11):997-1015.
52. Ghauri P.N., Buckley P.J. Globalization multinational enterprises and world poverty. Multinational corporations and global poverty reduction 2006, 204-232. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. C.J. Subhab, V. Sushil (Eds.).
53. Ghauri P., Hadjikhani A., Johanson J. Managing opportunity development in business networks 2005, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York.
54. Girma S., Görg H., Pisu M. The role of exporting and linkages for productivity spillovers from FDI. Research paper series: Globalisation, productivity and technology 2004, (GEP Research Paper No. 30), University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
55. Girma S., Greenaway D., Wakelin K. Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the UK?. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 2001, 48:19-33.
56. Giroud A. Transnational corporations, technology and economic development: Backward linkages and knowledge transfer in South-East Asia 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
57. Giroud A. MNEs vertical linkages: The experience of Vietnam after Malaysia. International Business Review 2007, 16(2):159-176.
58. Giroud A., Mirza H. Factors determining supply linkages between transnational corporations and local suppliers in ASEAN. Transnational Corporations 2006, 15(3):1-32.
59. Giroud A., Scott-Kennel J. MNE linkages in international business: A framework for analysis. International Business Review 2009, 18(6):555-566.
60. Glass A., Saggi K. International technology transfer and the technology gap. Journal of Development Economics 1998, 55:369-398.
61. Globerman S. Foreign direct investment and 'spillover' efficiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries. Canadian Journal of Economics 1979, 12:42-56.
62. Görg H., Greenaway D. Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment?. World Bank Research Observer 2003, 19:171-197.
63. Görg, H., & Ruane, F. (1997). Linkages between multinationals and indigenous firms: Evidence for the electronics sector in Ireland (Trinity Economic Papers Series, Technical Paper No. 98/13).
64. Görg H., Strobl E. Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis. Economic Journal 2001, 111:723-739.
65. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 1985, 91(3):481-510.
66. Grant R.M. Porter's competitive advantage of nations: An assessment. Strategic Management Journal 1991, 12(7):535-548.
67. Grant R.M. Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques and applications 2008, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA.
68. Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 1995, 40(4):619-652.
69. Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19(4):293-317.
70. Gulati R. Managing network resources: Alliances, affiliations, and other relational assets 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
71. Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from?. The American Journal of Sociology 1999, 104(5):1439-1462.
72. Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. Strategic network. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21(3):203-215.
73. Hair J.F., Black W.C., Babin B.J., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L. Multivariate data analysis 2006, Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
74. Håkanson L., Nobel R. Organizational characteristics and reverse technology transfer. Management International Review 2001, 41(4):395-420.
75. Hallén L., Johanson J., Sayed-Mohammed N. Interfirm adaptations in business relationships. Journal of Marketing 1991, 55:29-37.
76. Hansen M.W., Pedersen T., Petersen B. MNC strategies and local linkage effects in developing countries. Journal of World Business 2009, 44:121-130.
77. Haskel J., Pereira S., Slaughter M. Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms?. Review of Economics and Statistics 2007, 89(3):482-496.
78. Heide J. Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing 1994, 58:71-85.
79. Hoekman B., Javorcik B.S. Global integration and technology transfer 2006, Palgrave MacMillan, Basignstoke/New York.
80. Holm U., Holmström C., Sharma D. Competence development through business relationships or competitive environment? Subsidiary impact on MNC competitive advantage. Management International Review 2005, 45(2):197-218.
81. Holm U., Pedersen T. The emergence and impact of MNC centers of excellence: A subsidiary perspective 2000, MacMillan Press, London/New York.
82. Hymer S. The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment 1976, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
83. Ibarra H. Network centrality, power and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative role. The Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36(3):471-501.
84. Iguchi C. Determinants of backward linkages: The case of TNC subsidiaries in Malaysia. Asian Business & Management 2008, 7(1):53-74.
85. Javorcik B.S. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review 2004, 94:605-627.
86. Jindra B., Giroud A., Scott-Kennel J. Subsidiary roles, vertical linkages and economic development: Lessons from transition economies. Journal of World Business 2009, 44:167-179.
87. Kogut B., Chang S.J. Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 1991, 73:401-413.
88. Kokko A. Productivity spillovers from competition between local firms and foreign affiliates. Journal of International Development 1996, 8:517-530.
89. Konings J. The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms: Evidence from firm level panel data in emerging economies. Economics of Transition 2001, 9:619-633.
90. Kugler M. Spillovers from foreign direct investment: Within or between industries?. Journal of Development Economics 2006, 80:444-477.
91. Lane P.J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19(5):461-477.
92. Li L. The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra- and inter-organizational relationships. International Business Review 2005, 14(1):77-95.
93. Liu X., Siler P., Wang C., Wei Y. Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: Evidence from UK industry level panel data. Journal of International Business Studies 2000, 31(3):407-425.
94. Luo Y. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market. The case of China. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24(13):1315-1327.
95. Marin A., Bell M. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI): The active role of MNC subsidiaries in Argentina in the 1990. Journal of Development Studies 2006, 42:678-697.
96. McCann P., Mudambi R. Analytical differences in the economics of geography: The case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A 2005, 37:1857-1876.
97. McEvily B., Zaheer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20(12):1133-1156.
98. Mesquitas L.F., Anand J., Bruch T.H. Compering the resource based and relational views: Knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances. Strategic Management Review 2008, 29(9):913-941.
99. Moore K. A strategy for subsidiaries: Centers of excellences to build subsidiary specific advantages. Management International Review 2001, 41(3):275-290.
100. Moorman C., Slotegraaf R.J. The contingency value of complementary capabilities in product development. Journal of Marketing Research 1999, 36(2):239-257.
101. Morrison E.W. Newcomers relationships: The role of social network ties during socialization. The Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45(6):1149-1160.
102. Mowery D.C., Oxley J.E., Silverman B.S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 17(Winter Special Issue):77-91.
103. Mu S.C., Gnyawali D.R., Hatfield D.E. Foreign subsidiaries' learning from local environments: An empirical test. Management International Review 2007, 47(1):79-102.
104. Mudambi R., Navarra P. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies 2004, 35(5):385-404.
105. Nell P.C., Ambos B., Schlegelmilch B.B. The MNC as an externally embedded organization: An investigation of embeddedness overlap in local subsidiary network. Journal of World Business 2011, 46:497-505.
106. Pfeffer J. A resource dependence perspective on interorganizational relations. Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business 1987, 22-55. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.S. Mizruchi, M. Schwartz (Eds.).
107. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective 1978, Harper & Row, New York.
108. Phene A., Almeida P. Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies 2008, 39(5):901-919.
109. Porter M.E. The competitive advantage of the nations 1990, Free Press, New York.
110. Porter M.E. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 2000, 14(1):15-34.
111. Reed R., DeFillippi R. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 1990, 15(1):88-102.
112. Rodriguez-Clare A. Multinationals, linkages, and economic development. American Economic Review 1996, 86(4):852-873.
113. Rugman A. Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: A re-appraisal of the literature. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 1980, 116(2):365-379.
114. Rugman A., Verbeke A. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22(5):237-250.
115. Saliola F., Zanfei A. Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer. Research Policy 2009, 38(2):218-233.
116. Sanna-Randaccio F., Veugelers R. Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D: A game-theoretic approach. Journal of International Business Studies 2007, 38(1):47-63.
117. Santangelo G.D. MNCs and linkages creation: Evidence from a peripheral area. Journal of World Business 2009, 44:192-205.
118. Santangelo G.D. The tension of information sharing: Effects on subsidiary embeddedness. International Business Review 2011, 21(2):180-195.
119. Santangelo G.D., Meyer K. Extending the internationalization process model: Increases and decreases of MNE commitment in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies 2011, 42(7):894-909.
120. Scherer F.M. Firm size, market structure, opportunity and the output of patented innovations. American Economic Review 1965, 55(5):1097-1125.
121. Schumpeter J.A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 1942, Harper, New York.
122. Scott-Kennel J. Foreign direct investment and local linkages: An empirical investigation. Management International Review 2007, 47(1):1-27.
123. Scott-Kennel J., Enderwick P. Inter-firm alliance and network relationships and the eclectic paradigm of international production: An exploratory analysis of quasi-internalisation at the subsidiary level. International Business Review 2004, 3(4):425-445.
124. Scott-Kennel J., Enderwick P. Economic upgrading and foreign direct investment: Exploring the black box of the IDP. Transnational Corporations 2005, 14(1):105-137.
125. Shaver J.M., Flyer F. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21(12):1175-1193.
126. Siemsen E., Roth A., Oliveira P. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods 2009, 1-21.
127. Spencer W.J. The impact of multinational enterprise strategy on indigenous enterprises: Horizontal spillovers and crowding out in developing countries. Academy of Management Journal 2008, 33(2):341-361.
128. Turok I. Inward investment and local linkages: How deeply embedded is 'Silicon Glen'?. Regional Studies 1993, 27(5):401-417.
129. Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations. American Sociological Review 1996, 61:674-698.
130. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 1997, 42(1):35-67.
131. Weick K.E., Roberts K.H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly 1993, 38(3):357-381.