Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 901-919

  Phene, Anupama ^a   Almeida, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Capabilities; Innovation; Knowledge; Multinationals; Subsidiaries

Indexed keywords

EID: 46749109627     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400383     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. 1991. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3): 251-259.
2. Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 155-165.
3. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. 1999. The localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7): 905-917.
4. Almeida, P., & Phene, A. 2004. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 847-864.
5. Almeida, P., Grant, R., & Song, J. 1998. The role of international corporations in cross border knowledge transfer in the semiconductor industry. In M. Hitt, J. Ricart-Costa & R. Nixon (Eds), Managing strategically in an interconnected world: 119-148. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
6. Ambos, B., & Chini, T. 2005. Capabilities, cultural distance and the effectiveness of knowledge flows within the MNC. Academy of Management Proceedings: J1-J6.
7. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 979-997.
8. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
9. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Birkinshaw, J. 1996. How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3): 467-495.
11. Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 2000. Characteristics of foreign subsidiaries in industry clusters. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1): 141-154.
12. Birkinshaw, J., & Morrison, A. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4): 729-753.
13. Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 221-242.
14. Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15. Chandler Jr, A. D. 1990. Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Cohen, W., & Klepper, S. 1996. Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2): 232-244.
17. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99(397): 569-596.
18. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
19. Dunning, J. 1994. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1): 67-89.
20. Dyer, J., & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 345-367.
21. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679.
22. Feinberg, S. 2000. Do world product mandates really matter? Journal of International Business Studies, 31(1): 155-167.
23. Frost, T. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101-123.
24. Frost, T., & Zhou, C. 2005. R&D co-practice and 'reverse' knowledge integration in multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6): 676-687.
25. Frost, T., Birkinshaw, J., & Ensign, P. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 997-1019.
26. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. 1994. Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5): 91-112.
27. Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 10(4): 323-337.
28. Ghoshal, S., Korine, H., & Szulanski, G. 1994. Interunit communication in multinational corporations. Management Science, 40(1): 96-110.
29. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. 2003. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of patent citations. Management Science, 49(4): 366-395.
30. Graham, M. 1985. Industrial research in the age of big science. In R. Rosenbloom (Ed.), Research on technological innovation, management and policy, Vol. 2: 47-49. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31. Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375-387.
32. Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397-420.
33. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 203-215.
34. Gupta, A., & Govindrajan, V. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 768-793.
35. Gupta, A., & Govindrajan, V. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4): 473-497.
36. Hall, B., Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. 1986. Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27(2): 265-283.
37. Hansen, M. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1): 82-111.
38. Hansen, M., & Lovas, B. 2004. How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 801-822.
39. Hansen, M., Mors, M., & Lovas, B. 2005. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5): 776-793.
40. Hausman, J., Hall, B., & Griliches, Z. 1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4): 909-938.
41. Hedlund, G. 1994. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5): 73-90.
42. Henderson, R., & Clark, K. 1992. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9-30.
43. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 1996. Scale, scope and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1): 32-59.
44. Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. Inkpen, A., & Dinur, A. 1998. Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4): 454-468.
46. Jaffe, A., Fogarty, M., & Banks, B. 1998. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2): 183-205.
47. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-598.
48. Kogut, B., & Chang, S. 1991. Technological capabilities and Japanese foreign direct investment in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3): 401-413.
49. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3): 411-432.
50. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-396.
51. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4): 625-645.
52. Kotabe, M., Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Parente, R., & Mishra, H. 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2): 259-282.
53. Kuemmerle, W. 1999. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1): 1-24.
54. Lane, P., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.
55. Lane, P., Koka, B., & Pathak, S. 2006. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 833-863.
56. Lane, P., Salk, J., & Lyles, M. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1139-1161.
57. Lenox, M., & King, A. 2004. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4): 331-345.
58. Lorenzoni, G., & Lipparini, A. 1999. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4): 317-338.
59. Martinez, J., & Jarillo, C. 1991. Coordination demands of international strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3): 429-444.
60. Minbaeva, B., Pedersen, T., Björkman, I., Fey, C., & Park, H. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6): 586-599.
61. Mowery, D., Oxley, J., & Silverman, B. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 77-91.
62. Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. 2004. Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5): 385-406.
63. Mueller, D. 1966. Patents, research and development and the measurement of inventive activity. Journal of Industrial Economics, 15(1): 26-37.
64. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. 1982. The evolutionary theory of the firm. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65. Nicholls-Nixon, C., & Woo, C. 2003. Technology sourcing and the output of established firms in a regime of encompassing technological change. Strategic Management Journal, 24(7): 651-667.
66. Perlmutter, H. 1969. The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4(1): 9-18.
67. Phene, A., & Almeida, P. 2003. How do firms evolve? The patterns of technological evolution in semiconductor subsidiaries. International Business Review, 12(3): 349-367.
68. Porter, M. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6): 77-90.
69. Rosenkopf, L., Metui, A., & George, V. 2002. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4): 748-775.
70. Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 237-251.
71. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Shan, W., & Song, J. 1997. Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 267-284.
74. Spencer, J. 2001. How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2): 432-441.
75. Stopford, J., & Wells, L. 1972. Strategy and structure of the multinational enterprise. New York: Basic Books.
76. Stuart, T., & Podolny, J. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7): 21-38.
77. Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes. Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1): 172-188.
78. Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5): 996-1004.
79. Van den Bosch, F., Volberda, H., & Boer, M. 1999. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment. Organization Science, 10(5): 551-569.
80. Venaik, S., Midgeley, D., & Devinney, T. 2005. Dual paths to performance: The impact of global pressures on MNC subsidiary conduct and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5): 655-675.
81. Von Hippel, E. 1988. Sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Westney, E., & Sakakibara, M. 1986. The role of Japan based R&D in global technological strategy. In M. Hurowitch (Ed.), Technology in the modern corporation: 217-232. London: Pergamon.
83. Zahra, S., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.
84. Zander, I., & Solvell, O. 2000. Cross-border innovation in the multinational corporation. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(2): 44-68.
85. Zenger, T., & Lawrence, B. 1989. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2): 353-377.
86. Zucker, L., & Darby, M. 1998. Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36(1): 65-86.