Semiotic Structure and Meaning Making: The Performance of English Language Learners on Mathematics Tests

Educational Assessment

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 147-161

  Solano Flores, Guillermo ^a   Barnett Clarke, Carne ^b   Kachchaf, Rachel R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b WestEd ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883515549     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2013.814515     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abedi, J. 2004. The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33: 4 - 14.
2. Abedi, J. 2007. " English language proficiency assessment and accountability under the NCLB Title III: An overview ". In English language proficiency in the nation: Current status and future practice, Edited by: Abedi, J. 3 - 10. Davis: University of California, Davis.
3. Abedi, J. 2011. " Assessing English language learners: Critical issues ". In Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity, Edited by: Basterra, M. R., Trumbull, E. and Solano-Flores, G. 49 - 71. New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Abedi, J. and Lord, C. 2001. The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14: 219 - 234.
5. Adger, C. T., Snow, C. E. and Christian, D. 2002. What teachers need to know about language, McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems, Inc.
6. Aukerman, M. 2007. A culpable CALP: Rethinking the conversational/academic language proficiency distinction in early literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 60: 626 - 635.
7. Bailey, A. L. and Butler, F. A. 2003. An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document, Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 611)
8. Barnett-Clarke, C. and Ramírez, A. 2006. Mathematics pathways & pitfalls academic language assessment framework Unpublished manuscript
9. Barnett-Clarke, C., Ramírez, A. and Coggins, D. 2010. Math Pathways & Pitfalls lessons and teaching manuals, San Francisco, CA: WestEd. (Books 1-4)
10. Barwell, R. 2005. Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19: 118 - 126.
11. Behr, M., Lesh, R., Post, T. and Silver, E. 1983. " Rational number concepts ". In Acquisition of mathematics concepts and process, Edited by: Lesh, R. and Landau, M. 91 - 126. New York, NY: Academic Press.
12. Bod, R., Hay, J. and Jannedy, S., eds. 2003. Probabilistic linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MIT.
13. Brenner, M. E. 1998. Development of mathematical communication in problem solving groups by language minority students. Bilingual Research Journal, 22: 103 - 128.
14. Bruce, B. C., Rubin, A. and Starr, K. S. August 1981. Why readability formulas fail, August, Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. (Reading Education Report No. 28)
15. Butler, F. A., Lord, C., Stevens, R., Borrego, M. and Bailey, A. L. 2004. An approach to operationalizing academic language for language test development purposes: Evidence from fifth-grade science and math (CSE Report 626), Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
16. Carraher, D. W. 1996. " Learning about fractions ". In Theories of mathematical learning, Edited by: Steffe, L. P., Nesher, P., Goldin, G. A., Cobb, P. and Greer, B. 241 - 266. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Chamot, A. U. and O'Malley, J. M. 1994. The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Cummins, J. 1981. " The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students ". In Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework., Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles. In California State Department of Education (Ed.)
19. Durán, R. P. 2011. " Ensuring valid educational assessments for ELL students: Scores, score interpretation, and assessment uses ". In Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity, Edited by: Basterra, M. R., Trumbull, E. and Solano-Flores, G. 115 - 142. New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Fichtner, D., Peitzman, F. and Sasser, L. 1994. " What's fair? Assessing subject matter knowledge of LEP students in sheltered classrooms ". In With different eyes: Insights into teaching language minority students across the disciplines, Edited by: Peitzman, F. and Gadda, G. 143 - 159. Los Angeles: UCLA Publishing Center for Academic Interinstitutional Programs.
21. Guerrero, M. D. 2004. Acquiring academic English in one year: An unlikely proposition for English language learners. Urban Education, 39: 172 - 179.
22. Gutiérrez, K. D., Sengupta-Irving, T. and Dieckmann, J. 2010. " Developing a mathematical vision: Mathematics as a discursive and embodied practice ". In Language and mathematics in education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research, Edited by: Moschkovich, J. N. 29 - 71. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
23. Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G. and Witt, D. 2000. How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency?, University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Policy Reports (University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit), eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/lmri/pr/hakuta
24. Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning., London, UK: Hodder Arnold.
25. Halliday, M. A. K. 2005. Computational and quantitative studies, New York, NY: Continuum.
26. Harrison, C. 1999. " Readability ". In Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics, Edited by: Spolsky, B. 428 - 431. Kidlington, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
27. Hawkins, M. R. 2004. Researching English language and literacy development in schools. Educational Researcher, 33 (3): 14 - 25.
28. Heller, J. I., Curtis, D. A., Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Verboncoeur, C. J. 2007. The effects of "Math Pathways and Pitfalls" on students' mathematics achievement: National Science Foundation final report (ED498258) Retrieved from Education Resources Information Center database: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED498258
29. Heller, J. L., Hanson, T., Barnett-Clarke, C. and Darling, K. D. 2010. The impact of Math Pathways & Pitfalls on students' mathematics achievement and mathematical language development: A Study conducted in schools with high concentrations of Latino/a students and English learners., Oakland, CA: WestEd. Report submitted to the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, Grant R305K050050
30. Kachchaf, R. R. 2011. Exploring problem-solving strategies on multiple-choice science items: Comparing Native Spanish-Speaking English Language Learners and Mainstream Monolinguals, Boulder: University of Colorado. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
31. Khisty, L. L. 1995. " Making inequality: Issues of language and meaning in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students ". In New directions for equity in mathematics education, Edited by: Secada, W. G., Fennema, E. and Adajian, L. B. 279 - 297. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kopriva, R. J. 2008. " Access-based item development ". In Improving testing for English language learners, Edited by: Kopriva, R. J. 101 - 140. New York, NY: Routledge.
33. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. 2001. Multimodal discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication, London, UK: Arnold.
34. Lampert, M. and Cobb, P. 2003. " Communication and language ". In A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, Edited by: Kilpatrick, J., Martin, W. G. and Schifter, D. 237 - 249. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
35. Lemke, J. L. 1998. " Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text ". In Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, Edited by: Martin, J. R. and Veel, R. 87 - 113. New York, NY: Routledge.
36. Lemke, J. L. 2003. " Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word ". In Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing, Edited by: Anderson, M., Sáenz-Ludlow, A., Zellweger, S. and Cifarelli, V. V. 215 - 234. Ottawa, Canada: Legas.
37. Martiniello, M. 2008. Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78: 333 - 368.
38. Martiniello, M. 2009. Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14: 160 - 179.
39. Mayer, R. E. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. Mayer, R. E. and Sims, V. K. 1994. For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86: 389 - 401.
41. Moschkovich, J. N. 2007. Using two languages while learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64: 121 - 144.
42. Moss, J. and Case, R. 1999. Developing children's understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30: 122 - 147.
43. Nisbett, R. E. and Miyamoto, Y. 2005. The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 19: 467 - 473.
44. 2002. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115 Stat.1425
45. O'Halloran, K. L. 2011. " Multimodal discourse analysis ". In Companion to discourse, Edited by: Hyland, K. and Paltridge, B. London, UK: Continuum.
46. O'Malley, J. M. and Valdez-Pierce, L. 1996. Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers., Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
47. Parker, M. and Leinhardt, G. 1995. Percent: A privileged proportion. Review of Educational Research, 65: 421 - 481.
48. Pimm, C. 1987. Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms, London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
49. Pirie, S. E. B. 1998. " Crossing the gulf between thought and symbol: Language as (slippery) stepping-stones ". In Language and communication in the mathematics classroom, Edited by: Steinbring, H., Bartolini-Bussi, M. G. and Sierpinska, A. 7 - 29. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
50. Rothery, A. and Shuard, H. 1980. Children reading mathematics., Worcester, UK: College of Higher Education.
51. Scarcella, R. C. 2003. Academic English: A conceptual framework, Santa Barbara: University of Califronia Linguistic Minority Research Institute. (Rep. No. 2003-1)
52. Schleppegrell, M. J. 2010. " Language in mathematics teaching and learning: A research Review ". In Language and mathematics in education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research, Edited by: Moschkovich, J. N. 73 - 112. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
53. Shaftel, J., Belton-Kocher, E., Glasnapp, D. and Poggio, G. 2006. The impact of language characteristics in mathematics test items on the performance of English language learners and students with disabilities. Educational Assessment, 11: 105 - 126.
54. Sireci, S. G., Han, K. T. and Wells, C. S. 2008. Methods for evaluating the validity of test scores for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 13: 108 - 131.
55. Solano-Flores, G. 2006. Language, dialect, and register: Sociolinguistics and the estimation of measurement error in the testing of English-language learners. Teachers College Record, 108: 2354 - 2379.
56. Solano-Flores, G. 2008. Who is given tests in what language by whom, when, and where? The need for probabilistic views of language in the testing of English language learners. Educational Researcher, 37: 189 - 199.
57. Solano-Flores, G. 2010. " Function and form in research on language and mathematics education ". In Language and mathematics in education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research, Edited by: Moschkovich, J. N. 113 - 149. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
58. Solano-Flores, G. 2011. " Language issues in mathematics and the assessment of English language learners ". In Latinos/as and mathematics education: Research on learning and teaching in classrooms and communities, Edited by: Tellez, K., Moschkovich, J. and Civil, M. 283 - 314. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
59. Solano-Flores, G., Backhoff, E. and Contreras-Niño, L. A. 2009. Theory of test translation error. International Journal of Testing, 9: 78 - 91.
60. Solano-Flores, G. and Gustafson, M. 2013. " Assessment of English language learners: A critical, probabilistic, systemic view ". In Improving large scale assessment in education: Theory, issues, and practice, Edited by: Simon, M., Ercikan, K. and Rousseau, M. 87 - 109. New York: Taylor & Francis.
61. Solano-Flores, G. and Nelson-Barber, S. 2001. On the cultural validity of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38: 553 - 573.
62. Solano-Flores, G. and Wang, C. Conceptual framework for analyzing and designing illustrations in science assessment: Development and use in the testing of linguistically and culturally diverse populations. Paper presented the Annual Conference of the National Council on Measurement in Education. New Orleans, LA. April.
63. Stevens, R. A., Butler, F. A. and Castellon-Wellington, M. 2000. Academic language and content assessment: Measuring the progress of English language learners (ELLs) (CSE Report 552), Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
64. Trumbull, E. and Solano-Flores, G. 2011. " The role of language in assessment ". In Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity, Edited by: Basterra, M., Trumbull, E. and Solano-Flores, G. 22 - 45. New York, NY: Routledge.
65. Valdés, G. and Figueroa, R. A. 1994. Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
66. Wang, C. and Solano-Flores, G. The use of illustrations in large-scale science assessment: A comparative study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April.
67. Wearne, D. and Hiebert, J. 1989. Cognitive changes during conceptually based instruction on decimal fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81: 507 - 513.
68. Webb, N. M. 1991. Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22: 366 - 389.
69. Wellington, J. and Osborne, J. 2001. Language and literacy in science education, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
70. Wolf, M. K. and Leon, S. 2009. An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment, 14: 139 - 159.