Exploring the development of a decision support system (DSS) to prioritize engineered nanoparticles for risk assessment

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Marvin, Hans J P ^a   Bouwmeester, Hans ^a   Bakker, Martine ^b   Kroese, E Dinant ^c   Van De Meent, Dik ^d   Bourgeois, Francois ^b   Lokers, Rob ^a   Van Der Ham, Henk ^a   Verhelst, Lieke ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Characterisation; Decision support system; Nanoparticle; Risk assessment; Risk management; Toxicology

Indexed keywords

NANOPARTICLES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

CHARACTERISATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM (DSS); ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; KNOWLEDGE RULES; LOGIC REASONING; REGULATING AUTHORITIES; TOXICOLOGY; TYPES AND APPLICATIONS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

NANOPARTICLE;

COMPUTER SYSTEM; DATA BASE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE; LINGUISTICS; LOGIC; NANOENGINEERING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 84883485668     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1839-3     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Beaudrie CEH, Kandlikar M (2011) Horses for courses: risk information and decision making in the regulation of nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 13(4):1477-1488. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0234-1
2. Bouwmeester H, Dekkers S, Noordam MY, Hagens WI, Bulder AS, de Heer C, ten Voorde SECG, Wijnhoven SWP, Marvin HJP, Sips AJAM (2009) Review of health safety aspects of nanotechnologies in food production. Regul Toxicol Pharm 53(1):52-62
3. Bouwmeester H, Lynch I, Marvin HJP, Dawson K, Berges M, Braguer D, Byrne H, Casey A, Chambers G, Clift M, Elia G, Fernandes T, Fjellsbø L, Hatto P, Juillerat L, Klein C, Kreyling W, Nickel C, Riediker M, Stone V (2011) Minimal analytical characterisation of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices. Nanotoxicology 5(1):11
4. Brouwer DH (2012) Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg 56(5):506-514. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes039
5. Casals E, Pfaller T, Duschl A, Oostingh GJ, Puntes V (2010) Time Evolution of the nanoparticle protein corona. ACS Nano 4(7):3623-3632. doi: 10.1021/nn901372t
6. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Foy M, Berggard T, Donnelly SC, Cagney G, Linse S, Dawson KA (2007a) Detailed identification of plasma proteins adsorbed on copolymer nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 46(30):5754-5756 (Pubitemid 47172204)
7. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggard T, Thulin E, Nilsson H, Dawson KA, Linse S (2007b) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(7):2050-2055 (Pubitemid 46391350)
8. Cockburn A, Bradford R, Buck N, Constable A, Edwards G, Haber B, Hepburn P, Howlett J, Kampers F, Klein C, Radomski M, Stamm H, Wijnhoven S, Wildemann T (2012) Approaches to the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENM) in food. Food chem Toxicol 50(6):2224-2242. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.029 An international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association
9. Domingue J, Fensel D, Hendler JA (2011) Handbook of semantic web technologies. Springer reference, Springer, New York
10. EFSA (2011) EFSA Scientific Committee. Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J 9(5):36. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2140
11. Fauss E, Gorman ME, Swami N (2009) Using expert elicitation to prioritize resource allocation for risk identification for nanosilver. J Law Med Ethics 37(4):770-780. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00447.x
12. Flari V, Chaudhry Q, Neslo R, Cooke R (2011) Expert judgment based multi-criteria decision model to address uncertainties in risk assessment of nanotechnology-enabled food products. J Nanopart Res 13(5):1813-1831. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0335-x
13. Fourches D, Pu D, Tassa C, Weissleder R, Shaw SY, Mumper RJ, Tropsha A (2010) Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. ACS Nano 4(10):5703-5712. doi: 10.1021/nn1013484
14. Groeneveld RE, Willems DJM, Broekstra J, Van den Broek WHAM, Top JL (2009) ERDSS: Emerging risk detection support system - 2008 Project report. Agrotechnology and Food Sciences Group, Wageningen
15. Gruber TR (1993) A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/KSL-Abstracts/KSL-92-71.html
16. Hansen SF, Larsen BH, Olsen SI, Baun A (2007) Categories and Hazard Identification scheme of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 3:243-250 (Pubitemid 350179070)
17. Hastings J, Chepelev L, Willighagen E, Adams N, Steinbeck C, Dumontier M (2011) The chemical information ontology: provenance and disambiguation for chemical data on the biological semantic web. PLoS one 6(10):e25513
18. Lesniak A, Fenaroli F, Monopoli MP, Aberg C, Dawson KA, Salvati A (2012) Effects of the presence or absence of a protein corona on silica nanoparticle uptake and impact on cells. ACS Nano 6(7):5845-5857. doi: 10.1021/nn300223w
19. Liu R, Rallo R, George S, Ji Z, Nair S, Nel AE, Cohen Y (2011) Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Small 7(8):1118-1126. doi: 10.1002/smll.201002366
20. Lynch I, Dawson KA (2008) Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today 3(1-2):40-47 (Pubitemid 351298587)
21. Marvin HJP, Kleter GA, Frewer LJ, Cope S, Wentholt MTA, Rowe G (2009) A working procedure for identifying emerging food safety issues at an early stage: Implications for European and international risk management practices. Food Control 20:345-356
22. Morgan K (2005) Development of a preliminary framework for informing the risk analysis and risk management of Nanoparticles. Risk Anal 25:1621-1635 (Pubitemid 43188428)
23. Nel AE, Madler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EM, Somasundaran P, Klaessig F, Castranova V, Thompson M (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 8(7):543-557
24. Nel A, Xia T, Meng H, Wang X, Lin S, Ji Z, Zhang H (2012) Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. Acc Chem Res. doi: 10.1021/ar300022h
25. Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P (2008) Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg 52(6):419-428. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men041
26. Peters R, Kramer E, Oomen AG, Herrera Rivera ZE, Oegema G, Tromp PC, Fokkink R, Rietveld A, Marvin HJP, Weigel S, Peijnenburg AA, Bouwmeester H (2012) Presence of nano-sized silica during in vitro digestion of foods containing silica as a food additive. ACS Nano 6(3):2441-2451. doi: 10.1021/nn204728k
27. Puzyn T, Rasulev B, Gajewicz A, Hu X, Dasari TP, Michalkova A, Hwang HM, Toropov A, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2011) Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 6(3):175-178. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.10
28. Sayes C, Ivanov I (2011) Comparative study of predictive computational models for nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity. Risk Anal 30(11):1723-1734
29. SCENIHR (2007) Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risk SCENIHR. Opinion on: The appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the technical guidance documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials European Commission Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General. Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C7- Risk Assessment
30. Tervonen T, Linkov I, Figueira JR, Steevens J, Chappell M, Merad M (2009) Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 11(4):757-766. doi: 10.1007/s11051-008-9546-1
31. Van Duuren-Stuurman B, Vink SR, Verbist KJ, Heussen HG, Brouwer DH, Kroese DE, Van Niftrik MF, Tielemans E, Fransman W (2012) Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. Ann Occup Hyg 56(5):525-541. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer113
32. Walczak AP, Fokkink R, Peters R, Tromp P, Herrera Rivera Z, Rietjens I, Hendriksen PJ, Bouwmeester H (2012) Behavior of silver nanoparticles and silver ions in an in vitro human gastrointestinal digestion model. Nanotoxicology. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2012.726382
33. Xia X-R, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Riviere JE (2010) An index for characterization of nanomaterials in biological systems 5(9):671-675
34. Xia XR, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Mathur S, Song X, Xiao L, Oldenberg SJ, Fadeel B, Riviere JE (2011) Mapping the surface adsorption forces of nanomaterials in biological systems. ACS Nano 5(11):9074-9081. doi: 10.1021/nn203303c
35. Zhang H, Ji Z, Xia T, Meng H, Low-Kam C, Liu R, Pokhrel S, Lin S, Wang X, Liao YP, Wang M, Li L, Rallo R, Damoiseaux R, Telesca D, Madler L, Cohen Y, Zink JI, Nel AE (2012) Use of metal oxide nanoparticle band gap to develop a predictive paradigm for oxidative stress and acute pulmonary inflammation. ACS Nano 6(5):4349-4368. doi: 10.1021/nn3010087
36. Zuin S, Micheletti C, Critto A, Pojana G, Johnston H, Stone V, Tran L, Marcomin A (2011) Weight of evidence approach for the relative hazard ranking of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 5(3):445-458