The role of privacy protection in healthcare information systems adoption

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Hsu, Chien Lung ^a,b   Lee, Ming Ren ^c   Su, Chien Hui ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c TAOYUAN INNOVATION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Healthcare information system; Information security literacy; Perceived security; Privacy protection; UTAUT

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; PRIVACY; PRIVACY PROTECTION; BEHAVIOR;

COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; INTENTION; PERCEPTION; PRIVACY;

EID: 84883449411     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-013-9966-z     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. McKelvey, V. "Spending more on in-home care." Dec. 30, 2011; http://www.aarp.org/relationships/caregiving/info-01-2010/spendingmore-on-in- home-care.html.
2. Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., and Nykänen, P., Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 77(5):291-304, 2008.
3. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., Kawasumi, Y., The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 12(5):505-516, 2005.
4. Williams, F., and Boren, S. A., The role of electronic medical record in care delivery in developing countries. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 28(6):503-507, 2008.
5. Vishwanath, A., Singh, S. R., and Winkelstein, P., The impact of electronic medical record systems on outpatient workflows: A longitudinal evaluation of its workflow effects. Int. J. Med. Inform. 79(11):778-791, 2010.
6. Sokratis, K., Health care management and information systems security: Awareness, training or education? Int. J. Med. Inform. 60(2):129-135, 2000.
7. Adjerid, I., and Padman, R., Impact of health disclosure laws on health information exchanges. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2011:48-56, 2011.
8. Al Ameen, M., Liu, J., and Kwak, K., Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. J. Med. Syst. 36(1):93-101, 2012.
9. Haas, S., Wohlgemuth, S., Echizen, I., et al., Aspects of privacy for electronic health records. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(2):e26-e31, 2011.
10. Khansa, L., Cook, D. F., James, T., et al., Impact of HIPAA provisions on the stock market value of healthcare institutions, and information security and other information technology firms. Comput. Secur. 31(6):750-770, 2012.
11. Lee, C. D., Ho, K. I. J., and Lee, W. B., A novel key management solution for reinforcing compliance with HIPAA privacy/security regulations. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 15(4):550-556, 2011.
12. Murphy, S.N., Gainer, V., Mendis,M., et al., Strategies formaintaining patient privacy in i2b2. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 18(SUPPL. 1):103-108, 2011.
13. Son, J.,Kim, S., Park, G., et al., Security requirements for themedical information used by U-Healthcare medical equipment. Int. J. Secur. Appl. 7(1):169-180, 2013.
14. Sunil Kumar, C., Samy Durai, A., and Vinotha, S. R., Privacy and security solutions for interoperable health information exchange. Int. J. Med. Eng. Inform. 5(2):137-144, 2013.
15. Dmitrienko, A., Hadzic, Z., Löhr, H. et al., "Securing the access to electronic health records on mobile phones," 2011, pp. 365-379.
16. Garcia-Morchon, O., Falck, T., and Wehrle, K., Sensor network security for pervasive e-health. Sec Commun. Networks 4(11):1257-1273, 2011.
17. Huang, C., Lee, H., and Lee, D. H., A privacy-strengthened scheme for E-healthcare monitoring system. J. Med. Syst. 36(5):2959-2971, 2012.
18. Lin, H. Y., "On the security of a dynamic ID-based authentication scheme for telecare medical information systems," J. Med. Syst., vol. 37, no. 2, 2013.
19. Shin, M., "Secure remote health monitoring with unreliable mobile devices," Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, 2012.
20. Ting, D., Securing access to healthcare. Biom. Technol. Today 2011(2):10-11, 2011.
21. Belsis, P., Skourlas, C., and Gritzalis, S., Secure electronic healthcare records management in wireless environments. J. Inform. Technol. Res. 4(4):1-17, 2011.
22. Calvillo, J., Román, I., Rivas, S., et al., Privilege management infrastructure for virtual organizations in healthcare grids. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 15(2):316-323, 2011.
23. Gunter, C., Liebovitz, D., and Malin, B., Experience-based access management: A life-cycle framework for identity and access management systems. IEEE Secur. Priv. 9(5):48-55, 2011.
24. Jin, J., Ahn, G. J., Hu, H., et al., Patient-centric authorization framework for electronic healthcare services. Comput. Secur. 30(2-3):116-127, 2011.
25. Sun, L., Wang, H., Soar, J., et al., Purpose based access control for privacy protection in E-Healthcare services. J. Softw. 7(11):2443-2449, 2012.
26. Touati, F., and Tabish, R., "U-healthcare system: State-of-The-Art review and challenges," J. Med. Syst., vol. 37, no. 3, 2013.
27. Ge, Y., Ahn, D. K., Unde, B., et al., Patient-controlled sharing of medical imaging data across unaffiliated healthcare organizations. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 20(1):157-163, 2013.
28. Semor, I. C., Alemán, J. L. F., and Toval, A., Personal health records: New means to safely handle health data? Computer 45(11):27-33, 2012.
29. Yarmand, M. H., Sartipi, K., and Down, D. G., Behavior-based access control for distributed healthcare systems. J. Comput. Secur. 21(1):1-39, 2013.
30. Beranek Lafky, D., and Horan, T. A., Personal health records: Consumer attitudes toward privacy and security of their personal health information. Health Inform. J. 17(1):63-71, 2011.
31. Shin, D., Understanding purchasing behaviors in virtual economy: Consumer behavior of virtual currency in Web2.0 communities. Interact. Comput. 20(4):433-446, 2008.
32. Inamura,M., Saito, A., and Iwamura, K., A pre-control systemto edit contents with an extended sanitizable signature. IEEJ Trans. Electron. Inf. Syst. 133(4):802-815, 2013.
33. Ming, Y., Shen, X., and Peng, Y., Provably security identity-based sanitizable signature scheme without random oracles. J. Softw. 6(10):1890-1897, 2011.
34. Yum,D. H., and Lee, P. J., Sanitizable signatures reconsidered. IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. E94-A(2):717-724, 2011.
35. ISO/IEC-9798-3, "Information technology-Security techniques-Entity authentication mechanisms; Part 3; Entity authentication using a public key algorithm " International Organization for Standardization, 1-9, 1993.
36. Ming, Y., Shen, X., and Peng, Y., Identity-based sanitizable signature scheme in the standard model. Commun. Comput. Inf. Science 105 (Part 1):9-16, 2010.
37. Ferraiolo, D. F., and Kuhn, D. R., "Role based access control," 15th National Computer Security Conference, pp. 554-563, Oct 13-16, 1992, 1992.
38. Venkatesh, V.,Morris,M. G., Davis, G. B., et al., User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3):425-478, 2003.
39. Zhou, T., Lu, Y., and Wang, B., Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(4):760-767, 2010.
40. Davis, F. D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3):319-339, 1989.
41. Pai, J.-C., and Tu, F.-M., The acceptance and use of customer relationship management (CRM) systems: An empirical study of distribution service industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1):579-584, 2011.
42. Premkumar, G., and Bhattacherjee, A., Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models. OMEGA Int. J. Manag. Sci. 36:64-75, 2008.
43. Park, C.W., and Lessing, V. P., Students and housewives:Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. J. Consum. Res. 4(2):102-110, 1977.
44. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L., Information technology adoption across time: Across-sectional comparison of pre-Adoption and post-Adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 23(2):183-213, 1999.
45. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V., Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Q. 27(4):657-678, 2003.
46. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A., Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2):144-176, 1995.
47. Corey,M. A., and Agarwal, R., Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuation. MIS Q. 33(2):339-370, 2009.
48. Dewan, S., and Chen, L.,Mobile payment adoption in the US: Acrossindustry cross-platform solution. J. Inf. Priv. Secur. 1(2):4-28, 2005.
49. Lwin, M., Wirtz, J., and Williams, J. D., Consumer online privacy concerns and responses: A power-responsibility equilibrium perspective. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 35(4):572-585, 2007.
50. Shin, D., Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(6):1343-1354, 2009.
51. Wilson, M., Stine, K., and Bowen, P., "National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-16: Information technology security training requirements: A role-And performance-based model (Draft)", Nov. 22, 2011; http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/800-16- rev1/Draft-SP800-16-Rev1.pdf.
52. Lin, I. L., and Liu,M. D., "An investigation of high school teachers' cyber security literacy in Taiwan," in Taiwan Academic Network Conference (TANET 2007), Taipei, Taiwan, 2007.
53. Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., andWirtz, B.W., Understanding consumer 2acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 9(3):209-216, 2010.
54. Nunnally, J. C., Psychometric theory, 2nd edition.McGrawHill, New Y2ork, 1978.
55. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1):39-50, 1981.