Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis

Electronic Commerce Research and Applications

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 209-216

  Schierz, Paul Gerhardt ^a   Schilke, Oliver ^b   Wirtz, Bernd W ^c  

^a BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP   (Germany)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Deutsche Universität für Verwaltungswissenschaften Speyer   (Germany)

Author keywords

Consumer mobility; EQS; Intention to use; Mobile payment; Perceived ease of use; Perceived risk; Perceived usefulness; Structural equation modeling; Subjective norm; Technology acceptance model (TAM)

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS;

CONSUMER MOBILITIES; INTENTION TO USE; MOBILE PAYMENT; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED RISK; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; SUBJECTIVE NORM; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

ELECTRONIC MONEY;

EID: 84859888115     PISSN: 15674223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bagozzi, R. P. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 4, 2007, 243-254.
2. Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1, 1988, 74-94.
3. Bass, F. M. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 5, 1969, 215-227.
4. Bauer, H. H., Reichardt, T., Barnes, S. J., and Neumann, M. M. Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 3, 2005, 181-191.
5. Bauer, H. H., Reichardt, T., and Schüle, A. User Requirements for Location Based Services. University of Mannheim, Mannheim, 2005.
6. Bentler, P. M. EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Multivariate Software, Encino, CA, 1995.
7. Berry, W. D., and Feldman, S. Multiple Regression in Practice. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1985.
8. Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance. an expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 3, 2001, 351-370. (Pubitemid 33738440)
9. Bollen, K. A. Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 1987, 37-69.
10. Bollen, K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, Toronto, 1989.
11. Chau, P. Y. K., and Hu, P. J.-H. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32, 4, 2001, 699-719.
12. Cho, J. Likelihood to abort an online transaction: influences from cognitive evaluations, attitudes, and behavioral variables. Information and Management, 41, 7, 2004, 827-838.
13. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2003.
14. Dabholkar, P. A., and Bagozzi, R. P. An attitudinal model of technology-based selfservice. moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 3, 2002, 184-201. (Pubitemid 36703957)
15. Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N. and Öörni, A. Consumer acceptance of mobile payment solutions. In G.M. Giaglis (ed.), mBusiness 2003 - The Second International Conference on Mobile Business, Vienna, 2003, 211-218.
16. Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., and Zmijewska, A. Past, present and future of mobile payments research: a literature review. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 2, 2008, 165-181. (Pubitemid 351718565)
17. Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3, 1989, 319-340.
18. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. User acceptance of computer technology. Management Science, 35, 8, 1989, 982-1003.
19. Devaraj, S., Fan, M., and Kohli, R. Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference. validating e-commerce metrics. Information Systems Research, 13, 3, 2002, 316-333.
20. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Attributes, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
21. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1, 1981, 39-50.
22. Gartner Group Dataquest Insight: Mobile Payment, 2007-2012. Gartner Group, Stamford, CT, 2009.
23. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 1, 2003, 51-90.
24. Hardgrave, B. C., Davis, F. D., and Riemenschneider, C. K. Investigating determinants of software developers' intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 1, 2003, 123-151.
25. Hays, W. L. Statistics for the Social Sciences. Holt, New York, NY, 1973.
26. Henkel, J. Mobile payment. In G. Silberer, J. Wohlfahrt, and T. Wilhelm (eds.), Mobile Commerce, Gabler, Wiesbaden, 2002.
27. Homburg, C., Grozdanovic, M., and Klarmann, M. Responsiveness to customers and competitors: the role of affective and cognitive organizational systems. Journal of Marketing, 71, 3, 2007, 18-38.
28. Hwang, R.-J., Shiau, S.-H., and Jan, D.-F. A new mobile payment scheme for roaming services. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6, 2, 2007, 184-191. (Pubitemid 46810377)
29. Kleinrock, L. Nomadicity - anytime, anywhere in a disconnected world. Mobile Networks and Applications, 1, 4, 1996, 351-357. (Pubitemid 126724775)
30. Lee, M.-C. Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8, 3, 2009, 130-141.
31. Lim, N. Consumers' perceived risk: sources versus consequences. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 3, 2003, 216-228.
32. Linck, K., Pousttchi, K. and Wiedemann, D.G. Security issues in mobile payment from the customer viewpoint, In Proceedings of the 14th European Confer-ence on Information Systems (ECIS 2006), Göteborg, 2006.
33. Little, Arthur D. Global M-Payment Report 2004, Vienna, 2004.
34. Luarn, P., and Lin, H.-H. Toward an understanding of the behavioural intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 6, 2005, 873-891. (Pubitemid 40319865)
35. Lwin, M., Wirtz, J., and Williams, J. D. Consumer online privacy concerns and responses: a power-responsibility equilibrium perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 4, 2007, 572-585.
36. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., and Fetter, R. The impact of organizational citizenship behavior on evaluations of salesperson performance. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1, 1993, 70-80.
37. Mallat, N. Theoretical constructs of mobile payment adoption. Paper Presented at the 27th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS), Falkenberg, 2004.
38. Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K. and Öörni, A. The impact of use situation and mobility on the acceptance of mobile ticketing services, In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2006.
39. Mathieson, K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 1991, 173-191.
40. Mitchell, V.-W. Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 1/2, 1999, 163-195.
41. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 3, 1991, 192-222.
42. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.
43. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., and Thorbjørnsen, H. Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 3, 2005, 330-346. (Pubitemid 40977154)
44. Oh, S., Ahn, J., and Kim, B. Adoption of broadband Internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitudes. Journal of Information Technology, 18, 4, 2003, 267-280. (Pubitemid 38079932)
45. Pagani, M., and Schipani, D. Motivations and barriers to the adoption of 3G mobile multimedia services. In P. C. Deans (ed.), E-commerce and m-commerce technologies, Idea Group, Hershey, PA, 2005, 80-95.
46. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Malhotra, A. E-S-QUAL: a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7, 3, 2005, 213-233. (Pubitemid 40938024)
47. Pavlou, P. A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce. Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3, 2003, 101-134.
48. Plouffe, C. R., Hulland, J. S., and Vandenbosch, M. Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12, 2, 2001, 208-222.
49. Podsakoff, P. M., and Organ, D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 4, 1986, 531-544.
50. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, NY, 1995.
51. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., and Warshaw, P. R. The theory of reasoned action: a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 3, 1988, 325-343.
52. Statistisches Bundesamt. Statistisches Jahrbuch 2006. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden, 2006.
53. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6, 2, 1995, 144-176. (Pubitemid 126102974)
54. Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoptionimplementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 1, 1982, 28-45.
55. van der Heijden, H. Factors influencing the usage of Websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management, 40, 6, 2003, 541-549.
56. Venkatesh, V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2, 1999, 239-260.
57. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 4, 2000, 342-365. (Pubitemid 33224535)
58. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27, 3, 1996, 451-481.
59. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 2, 2000, 186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
60. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3, 2003, 425-478.
61. Webster, J., and Trevino, L. K. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two policy-capturing studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 6, 1995, 1544-1572. (Pubitemid 126020704)
62. Yang, H.-D., and Yoo, Y. It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38, 1, 2004, 19-31.
63. Yoon, C., and Kim, S. Convenience and TAM in a ubiquitous computing environment: the case of wireless LAN. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6, 1, 2007, 102-112. (Pubitemid 46453265)
64. Zmijewska, A., and Lawrence, E. Implementation models in mobile payment, In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference, Puerto Vallarta, 2006, 19-25.
65. Zmijewska, A., Lawrence, E. and Steele, R. Classifying m-payments, Paper Presented at the third International Conference on Mobile Business, New York, 2004.
66. Zmijewska, A., Lawrence, E. and Steele, R. Towards understanding of factors influencing user acceptance of mobile payment system, Paper Presented at the IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet, Madrid, 2004.