Size-dependent predilections of cardiogenic embolic transport

American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Volumn 305, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Carr, Ian A ^a   Nemoto, Naohiko ^b   Schwartz, Robert S ^b   Shadden, Shawn C ^a,c  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSTITUTE FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aorta; Embolic stroke; Hemodynamics; Particle transport

Indexed keywords

ANATOMIC MODEL; AORTA; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CARDIOEMBOLIC STROKE; COMMON CAROTID ARTERY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EMBOLIC PARTICLE; EMBOLISM; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERTEBRAL ARTERY;

AORTA; EMBOLIC STROKE; HEMODYNAMICS; PARTICLE TRANSPORT;

AORTA; AORTOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERIES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMBOLISM; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RISK FACTORS; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VERTEBRAL ARTERY;

EID: 84883439415     PISSN: 03636135     EISSN: 15221539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00320.2013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Albertsen IE, Rasmussen LH, Overvad TF, Graungaard T, Larsen TB, Lip GY. Risk of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation patients treated with warfarin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 44: 1329-1336, 2013.
2. Arzani A, Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T, Shadden SC. In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation. Ann Biomed Eng 40: 860-870, 2012.
3. Bockman MD, Kansagra AP, Shadden SC, Wong EC, Marsden AL. Fluid mechanics of mixing in the vertebrobasilar system: comparison of simulation and MRI. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 3: 450-461, 2012.
4. Bogren HG, Buonocore MH. Blood flow measurements in the aorta and major arteries with MR velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 4: 119-130, 1994.
5. Brandfonbrener M, Landowne M, Shock NW. Changes in cardiac output with age. Circulation 12: 557-566, 1955.
6. Brooks AN, Hughes TJ. Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 32: 199-259, 1982.
7. Bushi D, Grad Y, Einav S, Yodfat O, Nishri B, Tanne D. Hemodynamic evaluation of embolic trajectory in an arterial bifurcation: an in-vitro experimental model. Stroke 36: 2696-2700, 2005.
8. Caplan L, Chung CS, Wityk R, Glass T, Tapia J, Pazdera L, Chang HM, Dashe J, Chaves C, Vemmos K, Leary M, Dewitt L, Pessin M. New England medical center posterior circulation stroke registry: I. Methods, data base, distribution of brain lesions, stroke mechanisms, and outcomes. J Clin Neurol 1: 14-30, 2005.
9. Chung EM, Hague JP, Chanrion MA, Ramnarine KV, Katsogridakis E, Evans DH. Embolus trajectory through a physical replica of the major cerebral arteries. Stroke 41: 647-652, 2010.
10. Cokelet GR. Rheology and hemodynamics. Annu Rev Physiol 42: 311-322, 1980.
11. Duvernois V, Marsden AL, Shadden SC. Lagrangian analysis of hemodynamics data from FSI simulation. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Eng 29: 445-461, 2013.
12. Ferro JM. Cardioembolic stroke: an update. Lancet 2: 177-188.
13. Figueroa CA, Vignon-Clementel IE, Jansen KE, Hughes TJ, Taylor CA. A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in threedimensional deformable arteries. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 195: 5685-5706, 2006.
14. Fuster V, Halperin JL. Left ventricular thrombi and cerebral embolism. N Engl J Med 320: 392-394, 1989.
15. Hamon M, Baron JC, Viader F, Hamon M. Periprocedural stroke and cardiac catheterization. Circulation 118: 678-683, 2008.
16. Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM. A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 190: 305-319, 2000.
17. Kim HJ, Song JM, Kwon SU, Kim BJ, Kang DH, Song JK, Kim JS, Kang DW. Right-left propensity and lesion patterns between cardiogenic and aortogenic cerebral embolisms. Stroke 42: 2323-2325, 2011.
18. Ku JP, Elkins CJ, Taylor CA. Comparison of CFD and MRI flow and velocities in an in vitro large artery bypass graft model. Ann Biomed Eng 33: 257-269, 2005.
19. Kung EO, Les AS, Figueroa CA, Medina F, Arcaute K, Wicker RB, McConnell MV, Taylor CA. In vitro validation of finite element analysis of blood flow in deformable models. Ann Biomed Eng 39: 1947-1960, 2011.
20. Kung EO, Les AS, Medina F, Wicker RB, McConnell MV, Taylor AC. In vitro validation of finite-element model of AAA hemodynamics incorporating realistic outlet boundary conditions. J Biomech Eng 133: 041003, 2011.
21. Leary MC, Caplan LR. Cardioembolic stroke: an update on etiology, diagnosis and management. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 11: 52-63, 2008.
22. Macdonald RL, Kowalczuk A, Johns L. Emboli enter penetrating arteries of monkey brain in relation to their size. Stroke 26: 1247-1250, 1995.
23. Maxey MR. Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. Physics Fluids 26: 883-889, 1983.
24. Mei R, Lawrence CJ, Adrian RJ. Unsteady drag on a sphere at finite Reynolds number with small fluctuations in the free-stream. J Fluid Mech 233: 613-631, 1991.
25. Meyer JS, Charney JZ, Rivera VM, Mathew NT. Cerebral embolization: prospective clinical analysis of 42 cases. Stroke 2: 541-554, 1971.
26. Olufsen MS, Peskin CS, Kim WY, Pedersen EM, Nadim A, Larsen J. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 28: 1281-1299, 2000.
27. Pollanen MS. Behaviour of suspended particles at bifurcations: implications for embolism. Phys Med Biol 36: 397-401, 1991.
28. Rao S, Sila C. PFO closure for cryptogenic stroke: review of new data and results. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 15: 360-371, 2013.
29. Schmidt JP, Delp SL, Sherman MA, Taylor CA, Pande VS, Altman RB. The Simbios National Center: Systems Biology in Motion. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 96: 1266-1280, 2008.
30. Seed WA, Wood NB. Velocity patterns in the aorta. Cardiovasc Res 5: 319-330, 1971.
31. Taylor CA, Hughes TJ, Zarins CK. Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 158: 155-196, 1998.
32. Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen CA, Taylor KE. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure in arteries. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 195: 3776-3796, 2006.
33. Wang DH, Makaroun M, Webster MW, Vorp AD. Mechanical properties and microstructure of intraluminal thrombus from abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 123: 536-539, 2001.
34. Whiting KE, Jansen CH. A stabilized finite element method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using a hierarchical basis. Intl J Num Meth Fluids 35: 93-116, 2001.
35. Wilson N, Wang K, Dutton RW, Taylor C. A software framework for creating patient specific geometric models from medical imaging data for simulation based medical planning of vascular surgery. Lecture Notes Comp Sci 2208: 449-456, 2001.
36. Yigit AS, Christoforou AP, Majeed AM. A nonlinear visco-elastoplastic impact model and the coefficient of restitution. Nonlinear Dynamics 66: 509-521, 2011.
37. Zamir M, Sinclair P, Wonnacott TH. Relation between diameter and flow in major branches of the arch of the aorta. J Biomech 25: 1303-1310, 1992.