Karyotype stability in the genus Phaseolus evidenced by the comparative mapping of the wild species Phaseolus microcarpus

Genome

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 335-343

  Fonsêca, Artur ^a   Pedrosa Harand, Andrea ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bacterial artificial chromosome; Comparative mapping; Fluorescent in situ hybridization; Interstitial telomeric sequence; Repetitive DNA sequences

Indexed keywords

4',6 DIAMIDINO 2 PHENYLINDOLE; CHROMOMYCIN A3; INDOLE DERIVATIVE; RIBOSOME DNA;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME BANDING PATTERN; CHROMOSOME MAP; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETICS; KARYOTYPE; METHODOLOGY; PHASEOLUS; PLANT CHROMOSOME; TELOMERE;

CHROMOMYCIN A3; CHROMOSOME BANDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INDOLES; KARYOTYPE; PHASEOLUS; TELOMERE;

EID: 84883357982     PISSN: 08312796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2013-0025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ahn S. Tanksley S.D. 1993. Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 (17): 7980-7984. 10.1073/pnas.90.17. 7980. 8103599.
2. Almeida C. Pedrosa-Harand A. 2011. Contrasting rDNA evolution in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) and common bean (P. vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 132 (3): 212-217. 10.1159/000321677. 21063080.
3. Bonifácio E.M. Fonsêca A. Almeida C. dos Santos K.G.B. Pedrosa-Harand A. 2012. Comparative cytogenetic mapping between the lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) and the common bean (P. vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 124 (8): 1513-1520. 10.1007/s00122-012-1806-x. 22331139.
4. Brown G.K. Gilmartin A.J. 1989. Chromosome numbers in Bromeliaceae. Am. J. Bot. 76 (5): 657-665. 10.2307/2444413.
5. Cabral J.S. Felix L.P. Guerra M. 2006. Heterochromatin diversity and its co-localization with 5S and 45S rDNA sites in chromosomes of four Maxillaria species (Orchidaceae). Genet. Mol. Biol. 29 (4): 659-664. 10.1590/S1415- 47572006000400015.
6. Camats N. Ruiz-Herrera A. Parrilla J.J. Acien M. Payá P. Giulotto E. et al 2006. Genomic instability in rat: breakpoints induced by ionising radiation and interstitial telomeric-like sequences. Mutat. Res. 595 (1-2): 156-166. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.11.002.
7. Choi H.-K. Kim D. Uhm T. Limpens E. Lim H. Mun J.-H. et al 2004. A sequence-based genetic map of Medicago truncatula and comparison of marker colinearity with M. sativa. Genetics, 166 (3): 1463-1502. 10.1534/genetics.166. 3.1463.
8. Cox A.V. Bennett S.T. Parokonny A.S. Kenton A. Callimassia M.A. Bennett M.D. 1993. Comparison of plant telomere locations using a PCR-generated synthetic probe. Ann. Bot. 72 (3): 239-247. 10.1006/anbo.1993.1104.
9. David P. Chen N.W.G. Pedrosa-Harand A. Thareau V. Sévignac M. Cannon S.B. et al 2009. A nomadic subtelomeric disease resistance gene cluster in common bean. Plant Physiol. 151 (3): 1048-1065. 10.1104/pp.109.142109. 19776165.
10. Day J.P. Limoli C.L. Morgan W.F. 1998. Recombination involving interstitial telomere repeat-like sequences promotes chromosomal instability in Chinese hamster cells. Carcinogenesis, 19 (2): 259-265. 10.1093/carcin/19.2.259. 9498274.
11. Delgado-Salinas A. Turley T. Richman A. Lavin M. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the cultivated and species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae). Syst. Bot. 23: 438-460. 10.2307/2419699.
12. Delgado-Salinas A. Bibler R. Lavin M. 2006. Phylogeny of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae): a recent diversification in an ancient landscape. Syst. Bot. 31: 779-791. 10.1600/036364406779695960.
13. Dubcovsky J. Dvorák J. 1995. Ribossomal RNA multigene loci: nomads of the Triticeae genomes. Genetics, 140 (4): 1367-1377. 7498776.
14. Fonsêca A. Ferreira J. dos Santos T.R.B. Mosiolek M. Bellucci E. Kami J. et al 2010. Cytogenetic map of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Chromosome Res. 18 (4): 487-502. 10.1007/s10577-010-9129-8. 20449646.
15. Fuchs J. Brandes A. Schubert I. 1995. Telomere sequence localization and karyotype evolution in higher plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 196 (3-4): 227-241. 10.1007/BF00982962.
16. Geffroy V. Macadré C. David P. Pedrosa-Harand A. Sévignac M. Dauga C. Langin T. 2009. Molecular analysis of a large subtelomeric NBS-LRR family in two representative genotypes of the major gene pools of Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics, 181 (2): 405-419. 10.1534/genetics.108.093583. 19087965.
17. Guerra M.S. 1986. Reviewing the chromosome nomenclature of Levan et al. Rev. Bras. Genet. 9: 741-743.
18. Heslop-Harrison J.S. Harrison G.E. Leitch I.J. 1992. Reprobing of DNA: DNA in situ hybridization preparations. Trends Genet. 8 (11): 372-373. 10.1016/0168-9525(92)90287-E. 1440872.
19. Judd, W.S., Campbell, C.S., Kellogg, E.A., Stevens, P.F., and Donoghue, M.J. 2009. Sistemática Vegetal: Um Enfoque Filogenético. Artmed, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
20. Kami J. Poncet V. Geffroy V. Gepts P. 2006. Development of four phylogenetically-arrayed BAC libraries and sequence of the APA locus in Phaseolus vulgaris. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112 (6): 987-998. 10.1007/s00122-005- 0201-2. 16404584.
21. Kim H. Miguel P.S. Nelson W. Collura K. Wissotski M. Walling J.G. et al 2007. Comparative physical mapping between Oryza sativa (AA genome type) and O. punctata (BB genome type). Genetics, 176 (1): 379-390. 10.1534/genetics.106. 068783.
22. Koumbaris G.L. Bass H.W. 2003. A new single-locus cytogenetic mapping system for maize (Zea mays L.): overcoming FISH detection limits with marker-selected sorghum (S. propinquum L.) BAC clones. Plant J. 35 (5): 647-659. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01829.x.
23. Lagercrantz U. 1998. Comparative mapping between Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica nigra indicates that Brassica genomes have evolved through extensive genome replication accompanied by chromosome fusions and frequent rearrangements. Genetics, 150 (3): 1217-1228. 9799273.
24. Lagercrantz U. Lydiate D.J. 1996. Comparative genome mapping in Brassica. Genetics, 144 (4): 1903-1910. 8978073.
25. Lysak M.A. Berr A. Pecinka A. Schmidt R. McBreen K. Schubert I. 2006. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (13): 5224-5229. 10.1073/pnas.0510791103. 16549785.
26. Mandáková T. Lysak M.A. 2008. Chromosomal phylogeny and karyotype evolution in x =7 crucifer species (Brassicaceae). Plant Cell, 20 (10): 2559-2570. 10.1105/tpc.108.062166. 18836039.
27. Marchant C.J. 1973. Chromosome variation in Araceae: V. Acoreae to Lasieae. Kew Bull. 8: 199-210. 10.2307/4119780.
28. Mercado-Ruaro, P., and Delgado-Salinas, A. 1996. Karyological studies in several mexican species of Phaseolus L. and Vigna savi (Phaseolinae, Fabaceae). In Advances in legumes systematics. 8: Legumes of economic importance. Edited by B. Pickergill and J.M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. pp. 83-87.
29. Mercado-Ruaro P. Delgado-Salinas A. 1998. Karyotypic studies on species of Phaseolus (Fabaceae: Phaseolinae). Am. J. Bot. 85 (1): 1-9. 10.2307/2446547. 21684873.
30. Mercado-Ruaro P. Delgado-Salinas A. 2009. Karyotypic analysis in six species of Phaseolus L. (FABACEAE). Caryologia, 62 (3): 167-170.
31. Moscone E.A. Klein F. Lambrou M. Fuchs J. Schweizer D. 1999. Quantitative karyotyping and dual-color FISH mapping of 5S and 18S-25S rDNA probes in the cultivated Phaseolus species (Leguminosae). Genome, 42 (6): 1224-1233. 10.1139/g99-070. 10659791.
32. Pedrosa A. Sandal N. Stougaard J. Schweizer D. Bachmair A. 2002. Chromosomal map of the model legume Lotus japonicus. Genetics, 161 (4): 1661-1672. 12196409.
33. Pedrosa-Harand A. de Almeida C.C.S. Mosiolek M. Blair M.W. Schweizer D. Guerra M. 2006. Extensive ribosomal DNA amplification during Andean common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) evolution. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112 (5): 924-933. 10.1007/s00122-005-0196-8. 16397788.
34. Pedrosa-Harand A. Porch T. Gepts P. 2008. Standard nomenclature for common bean chromosomes and linkage groups. Annu. Rep. Bean. Improv. Coop. 51: 106-107.
35. Pedrosa-Harand A. Kami J. Gepts P. Geffroy V. Schweizer D. 2009. Cytogenetic mapping of common bean chromosomes reveals a less compartmentalized small-genome plant species. Chromosome Res. 17 (3): 405-417. 10.1007/s10577-009-9031-4. 19330455.
36. Raskina O. Belyayev A. Nevo E. 2004. Quantum speciation in Aegilops: molecular cytogenetic evidence from rDNA cluster variability in natural populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (41): 14818-14823. 10.1073/pnas.0405817101. 15466712.
37. Ribeiro T. dos Santos K.G.B. Fonsêca A. Pedrosa-Harand A. 2011. Isolation and characterization of a new repetitive DNA family recently amplified in the Mesoamerican gene pool of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Fabaceae). Genetica, 139 (9): 1135-1142. 10.1007/s10709-011-9615-8.
38. Richards E.J. Ausubel F.M. 1988. Isolation of a higher eukaryotic telomere from Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell, 53 (1): 127-136. 10.1016/0092-8674(88) 90494-1. 3349525.
39. Ruiz-Herrera A. García F. Azzalin C. Giulotto E. Egozcue J. Ponsà M. Garcia M. 2002. Distribution of intrachromosomal telomeric sequences (ITS) on Macaca fascicularis (Primates) chromosomes and their implication for chromosome evolution. Hum. Genet. 110 (6): 578-586. 10.1007/s00439-002-0730-6. 12107444.
40. Schwarzacher T. Ambros P. Schweizer D. 1980. Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Plant Syst. Evol. 134 (3-4): 706-712. 10.1007/BF00986805.
41. Schweizer D. 1976. Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma, 58 (4): 307-324. 10.1007/BF00292840. 137107.
42. Shippen D.E. McKnight T.D. 1998. Telomeres, telomerase, and plant development. Trends Plant. Sci. 3 (4): 126-130. 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01214-X.
43. Tanksley S.D. Ganal M.W. Prince J.P. de Vicente M.C. Bonierbale M.W. Broun P. et al 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato. Genetics, 132: 1141-1160. 1360934.
44. Vallejos C.E. Sakiyama N.S. Chase C.D. 1992. A molecular marker-based linkage map of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Genetics, 131 (3): 733-740. 1352759.
45. Wanzenböck E.-M. Schöfer C. Schweizer D. Bachmair A. 1997. Ribosomal transcription units integrated via T-DNA transformation associate with the nucleolus and do not require upstream repeat sequences for activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 11 (5): 1007-1016. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997. 11051007.x. 9193072.
46. Yang L. Koo D.-H. Li Y. Zhang X. Luan F. Havey M.J. et al 2012. Chromosome rearrangements during domestication of cucumber as revealed by high-density genetic mapping and draft genome assembly. Plant J. 71 (6): 895-906. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05017.x. 22487099.
47. Zheng J. Nakata M. Uchiyama H. Morikawa H. Tanaka R. 1991. Giemsa C-banding patterns in several species of Phaseolus L. and Vigna savi, Fabaceae. Cytologia, 56: 459-466. 10.1508/cytologia.56.459.