Auditory processing disorder (APD) in children: A marker of neurodevelopmental syndrome

Hearing, Balance and Communication

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 160-167

  Moore, David R ^a   Hunter, Lisa L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory perception; Cognitive hearing; Learning disorder; Listening difficulty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; COGNITION; HEARING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MEMORY; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEURODEVELOPMENTAL SYNDROME; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RHOMBENCEPHALON; SPEECH DISORDER;

EID: 84883315457     PISSN: 21695717     EISSN: 21695725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/21695717.2013.821756     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hind SE, Haines-Bazrafshan R, Benton CL, Brassington W, Towle B, Moore DR. Prevalence of clinical referrals having hearing thresholds within normal limits. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50: 708-16.
2. AAA. Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder 2010. Available from: http://www.audiology. org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/CAPD%20 Guidelines%208-2010.pdf.
3. Dillon H, Cameron S, Glyde H, Wilson W, Tomlin D. An opinion on the assessment of people who may have an auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012; 23: 97-105.
4. Moore DR, Rosen S, Bamiou DE, Campbell NG, Sirimanna T. Evolving concepts of developmental auditory processing disorder (APD): a British Society of Audiology APD special interest group ' white paper '. Int J Audiol. 2013; 52: 3-13.
5. Snowling MJ. Editorial: seeking a new characterization of learning disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012; 53: 1-2.
6. BSA. Position statement: Auditory processing disorder (APD) 2011. 1-9. Available from: http://www.thebsa.org.uk/images/stories/docs/BSA-APD- PositionPaper-31March11-FINAL. pdf.
7. Norena AJ, Farley BJ. Tinnitus-related neural activity: theories of generation, propagation, and centralization. Hear Res. 2013; 295: 161-71.
8. Hood LJ, Brashears S, Long G, Talmadge C. Understanding subtle changes in auditory function with otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133:3376. doi: 10.1121/1.4805801. PMID:23655137[PubMed-in process] http://www.merriam- webster.com/
9. Johnson EW. Tuning forks to audiometers and back again. The Laryngoscope. 1970; 80: 49-68.
10. Oxenham AJ, Bacon SP. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear. 2003; 24: 352-66.
11. Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 6th edn. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books. 2012.
12. Hunter LL, Margolis RH, Rykken JR, Le CT, Daly KA, Giebink GS. High frequency hearing loss associated with otitis media. Ear Hear. 1996; 17: 1-11.
13. Gravel JS, Roberts JE, Roush J, Grose J, Besing J, Burchinal M, et al. Early otitis media with effusion, hearing loss, and auditory processes at school age. Ear Hear. 2006; 27: 353-68.
14. Badri R, Siegel JH, Wright BA. Auditory fi lter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 129: 852-63.
15. Campbell NG, Bamiou DE, Sirimanna T. Current progress in auditory processing disorder. ENT & Audiol News. 2012; 21: 86-90.
16. Hartley DE, Hill PR, Moore DR. The auditory basis of language impairments: temporal processing versus processing effi ciency hypotheses. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003; 67(Suppl 1):S137-42.
17. Hill PR, Hartley DE, Glasberg BR, Moore BC, Moore DR. Auditory processing effi ciency and temporal resolution in children and adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47: 1022-9.
18. Hartley DE, Moore DR. Effects of otitis media with effusion on auditory temporal resolution. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 69: 757-69.
19. Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Plack CJ, Biswas AK. The shape of the ear's temporal window. J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 83: 1102-16.
20. Hartley DE, Moore DR. Auditory processing effi ciency defi cits in children with developmental language impairments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 112: 2962-6.
21. Anastasio AR, Momensohn-Santos TM. Synthetic sentence identifi cation (SSI) and contralateral acoustic stapedius refl ex. Pro-fono: revista de atualizacao cientifi ca. 2005; 17: 355-66.
22. Higson JM, Morgan N, Stephenson H, Haggard MP. Auditory performance and acoustic refl exes in young adults reporting listening diffi culties. Br J Audiol. 1996; 30: 381-7.
23. Pangrsic T, Reisinger E, Moser T. Otoferlin: a multi-C2 domain protein essential for hearing. Trends Neurosci. 2012; 35: 671-80.
24. Anderson S, White-Schwoch T, Parbery-Clark A, Kraus N. Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2013; 110: 4357-62.
25. Parbery-Clark A, Anderson S, Kraus N. Musicians change their tune: how hearing loss alters the neural code. Hear Res. 2013; 302: 121-31.
26. Hornickel J, Zecker SG, Bradlow AR, Kraus N. Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 16731-6.
27. Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T, Kraus N. Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 14156-64.
28. Chandrasekaran B, Kraus N, Wong PC. Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107: 1325-36.
29. Nuttall HE, Heinrich A, Moore DR, de Boer J. Do cochlear mechanisms explain the noise disruption of the auditory brainstem response to speech J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133: 3428.
30. Hackett T A. Information flow in the auditory cortical network. Hear Res. 2011; 271: 133-46.
31. Moore DR. Listening difficulties in children: bottom-up and top-down contributions. J Commun Dis. 2012; 45: 411-8.
32. Wang X, Bendor D. Pitch. In: Rees A, Palmer AR, editors. The Auditory Brain. The Oxford Handbook of Auditory Science. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 149-72.
33. Rauschecker JP, Scott SK. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: non-human primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci. 2009; 12: 718-24.
34. Scott SK. The neurobiology of speech perception and production: can functional imaging tell us anything we did not already know J Commun Dis. 2012; 45: 419-25.
35. Fritz, David SV, Radtke-Schuller S, Yin P, Shamma SA. Adaptive, behaviorally gated, persistent encoding of task-relevant auditory information in ferret frontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2010; 13: 1011-9.
36. Ress D, Backus BT, Heeger DJ. Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nat Neurosci. 2000; 3: 940-5.
37. Briggs F, Mangun GR, Usrey WM. Attention enhances synaptic effi cacy and the signal-to-noise ratio in neural circuits. Nature. 2013. Epub 26 June 2013.
38. Mesgarani N, Chang EF. Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception. Nature. 2012; 485: 233-6.
39. Zion Golumbic EM, Ding N, Bickel S, Lakatos P, Schevon CA, McKhann GM, et al. Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a ' cocktail party '. Neuron. 2013; 77: 980-91. PubMed PMID: 23473326. Epub 2013/03/12. eng.
40. Dayan E, Censor N, Buch ER, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Non-invasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16: 838-44.
41. Kiessling J, Pichora-Fuller MK, Gatehouse S, Stephens D, Arlinger S, Chisolm T, et al. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int J Audiol. 2003; 42(Suppl 2): S92-101.
42. Baddeley A. Working memory. Science (New York, NY). 1992; 255: 556-9.
43. Kiyonaga A, Egner T. Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonom Bull Rev. 2013; 20: 228-42.
44. Dolan RJ. Neuroimaging of cognition: past, present, and future. Neuron. 2008; 60: 496-502.
45. Barton B, Venezia JH, Saberi K, Hickok G, Brewer AA. Orthogonal acoustic dimensions defi ne auditory fi eld maps in human cortex. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 20738-43.
46. Salimpoor VN, van den Bosch I, Kovacevic N, McIntosh AR, Dagher A, Zatorre RJ. Interactions between the nucleus accumbens and auditory cortices predict music reward value. Science (New York, NY). 2013; 340: 216-9.
47. Schmithorst VJ, Holland SK, Plante E. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals white matter microstructure correlations with auditory processing ability. Ear Hear. 2011; 32: 156-67.
48. James W. The Principles of Psychology (2 vols.). New York: Henry Holt; 1890.
49. Zwislocki J, Maire F, Feldman AS, Rubin H. On the effect of practice and motivation on the threshold of audibility. J Acoust Soc Am. 1958; 30: 254-62.
50. Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, Harris TB, Purchase-Helzner E, et al. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Int Med. 2013; 173: 293-9.
51. Marschark M, Hauser PC. Deaf Cognition: foundations and outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
52. Peelle JE, Johnsrude IS, Davis MH. Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Frontiers Hum Neurosci. 2010; 4: 51.
53. Hazan V, Messaoud-Galusi S, Rosen S, Nouwens S, Shakespeare B. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true defi cit J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009; 52: 1510-29.