Musicians change their tune: How hearing loss alters the neural code

Hearing Research

Volumn 302, Issue , 2013, Pages 121-131

  Parbery Clark, Alexandra ^a   Anderson, Samira ^a   Kraus, Nina ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSICIAN; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SKILL; SPEECH; SPEECH IN NOISE PERCEPTION; WORKING MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AGE FACTORS; AGED; COMMUNICATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; NOISE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84879602278     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Aiken S.J., Picton T.W. Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds. Hearing Research 2008, 245(1-2):35-47.
2. Aizawa N., Eggermont J. Effects of noise-induced hearing loss at young age on voice onset time and gap-in-noise representations in adult cat primary auditory cortex. JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2006, 7:71-81.
3. Anderson S., Skoe E., Chandrasekaran B., Kraus N. Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30:4922-4926.
4. Anderson S., Skoe E., Chandrasekaran B., Zecker S., Kraus N. Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children. Hearing Research 2010, 270:151-157.
5. Anderson S., Parbery-Clark A., Yi H.G., Kraus N. Aneural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Ear and Hearing 2011, 32:750-757.
6. Anderson S., Parbery-Clark A., White-Schwoch T., Kraus N. Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. Journal of Neuroscience 2012, 32:14156-14164.
7. Anderson S., Parbery-Clark A., White-Schwoch T., Kraus N. Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2013, 56:31-43.
8. Assmann P.F., Summerfield A.Q. Perceptual segregation of concurrent vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1987, 82:S120.
9. Bajo V.M., Nodal F.R., Moore D.R., King A.J. The descending corticocollicular pathway mediates learning-induced auditory plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 2010, 13:253-260.
10. Barsz K., Wilson W.W., Walton J.P. Reorganization of receptive fieldsfollowing hearing loss in inferior colliculus neurons. Neuroscience 2007, 147:532-545.
11. Baumann O., Belin P. Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers. Psychological Research 2010, 74:110-120.
12. Bellgrove M.A., Hawi Z., Kirley A., Gill M., Robertson I.H. Dissecting the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) phenotype: sustained attention, response variability and spatial attentional asymmetries in relation to dopamine transporter (DAT1) genotype. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1847-1857.
13. Bench J., Kowal A., Bamford J. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology 1979, 13:108-112.
14. Bird J., Darwin C.J. Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences. Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing 1998, 263-269. Whurr, London. A.R. Palmer, A. Rees, A.Q. Summerfield, R. Meddis (Eds.).
15. Blair J.C. The effects of mild sensorineural hearing loss on academic performance of young school-age children. Volta Review 1985, 87:87-93.
16. Boettcher F.A. Presbyacusis and the auditory brainstem response. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2002, 45:1249-1261.
17. Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects withsensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984, 27:134-144.
18. Brokx J.P.L., Nooteboom S.G. Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics 1982, 10:23-36.
19. Bureš Z., Grécová J., Popelář J., Syka J. Noise exposure during early development impairs the processing of sound intensity in adult rats. European Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 32:155-164.
20. Byrne D., Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear and Hearing 1986, 7:257-265.
21. Castellanos F.X., Tannock R. Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2002, 3:617-628.
22. Christian E., Dluhy N., O'Neill R. Sounds of silence: coping with hearing loss and loneliness. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 1989, 15:4-9.
23. Clarke F., Becker R. Comparison of techniques for discriminating among talkers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1969, 12:747-761.
24. Clinard C.G., Tremblay K.L., Krishnan A.R. Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hearing Research 2010, 264:48-55.
25. Crandell C.C. Speech recognition in noise by children with minimal degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 1993, 14:210-216.
26. Culling J.F., Darwin C.J. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1993, 93:3454-3467.
27. Dalton D.S., Cruickshanks K.J., Klein B.E.K., Klein R., Wiley T.L., Nondahl D.M. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. The Gerontologist 2003, 43:661-668.
28. Dong S., Mulders W.H.A.M., Rodger J., Robertson D. Changes in neuronal activity and gene expression in guinea-pig auditory brainstem after unilateral partial hearing loss. Neuroscience 2009, 159:1164-1174.
29. Drullman R., Bronkhorst A. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:3090-3098.
30. Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D., Langhofer L.R. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a nonsense-syllable test II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1982, 25:141-148.
31. Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D., Morgan D.E. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1984, 76:87-96.
32. Gatehouse S., Noble W. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). International Journal of Audiology 2004, 43:85-99.
33. Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1986, 79:1020-1033.
34. Guse L.W., Masesar M.A. Quality of life and successful aging in long-term care: perceptions of residents. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 1999, 20:527-539.
35. Harrison R.V., Ibrahim D., Mount R.J. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in auditory midbrain following partial cochlear damage in the developing chinchilla. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 123:449-460.
36. Heine C., Browning C.J. Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions. Disability & Rehabilitation 2002, 24:763-773.
37. Heine C., Browning C.J. The communication and psychosocial perceptions of older adults with sensory loss: a qualitative study. Ageing and Society 2004, 24:113-130.
38. Helfer K.S., Wilber L.A. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1990, 33:149-155.
39. Hornickel J., Zecker S., Bradlow A., Kraus N. Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012, 109:16731-16736.
40. Hultsch D.F., MacDonald S.W.S., Hunter M.A., Levy-Bencheton J., Strauss E. Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology 2000, 14:588-598.
41. Johnson, J.K., Louhivuori, J., Stewart, A., Tolvanen, A., Ross, L., Era, P., (under review). Quality of Life (QOL) of Older Adult Community Choral Singers in Finland.
42. Konrad-Martin D., Dille M.F., McMillan G., Griest S., McDermott D., Fausti S.A., Austin D.F. Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2012, 23:18-35.
43. Kotak V.C., Fujisawa S., Lee F.A., Karthikeyan O., Aoki C., Sanes D.H. Hearing loss raises excitability in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:3908-3918.
44. Krampe R.T., Ericsson K.A. Maintaining excellence: deliberate practice and elite performance in young and older pianists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1996, 125:331-359.
45. Kraus N., Chandrasekaran B. Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2010, 11:599-605.
46. Kraus N., Bradlow A.R., Cheatham M.A., Cunningham J., King C.D., Koch D.B., Nicol T.G., McGee T.J., Stein L.K., Wright B.A. Consequences of neural asynchrony: a case of auditory neuropathy. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 2000, 1:33-45.
47. Kreiman J., Gerratt B., Precoda K., Berke G. Individual differences in voice quality perception. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992, 35:512-520.
48. Kujala T., Brattico E. Detrimental noise effects on brain's speech functions. Biological Psychology 2009, 81:135-143.
49. Leek M.R., Dorman M.F., Summerfield Q. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1987, 81:148-154.
50. Miller G.A., Nicely P.E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1955, 27:338-352.
51. Moore B.C. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues 2007, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
52. Quick Statistics 2012, NIDCD, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, MD. http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/Pages/quick.aspx.
53. Nilsson M., Soli S., Sullivan J. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95:1085-1099.
54. Ohde R.N., Abou-Khalil R. Age differences for stop-consonant and vowel perception in adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2001, 110:2156-2166.
55. Otto W.C., McCandless G.A. Aging and the auditory brain stem response. International Journal of Audiology 1982, 21:466-473.
56. Oxenham A. Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: Implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants. Trends in Amplification 2008, 12:316-331.
57. Parbery-Clark A., Skoe E., Kraus N. Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:14100-14107.
58. Parbery-Clark A., Skoe E., Lam C., Kraus N. Musician enhancement for speech in noise. Ear and Hearing 2009, 30:653-661.
59. Parbery-Clark A., Strait D.L., Anderson S., Hittner E., Kraus N. Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e18082.
60. Parbery-Clark A., Anderson S., Hittner E., Kraus N. Musical experience offsets age-related delays in neural timing. Neurobiology of Aging 2012, 33:1483.e1481-1483.e1484.
61. Parbery-Clark A., Anderson S., Hittner E., Kraus N. Musical experience strengthens the neural representation of sounds important for communication in middle-aged adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2012, 4:1-12.
62. Parbery-Clark A., Tierney A., Strait D., Kraus N. Musicians have fine-tuned neural distinction of speech syllables. Neuroscience 2012, 219:111-119.
63. Plyler P., Ananthanarayan A. Human frequency-following responses: representation of second formant transitions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2001, 12:523-533.
64. Reed C.M., Braida L.D., Zurek P.M. Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits. Trends in Amplification 2009, 13:4-43.
65. Shinn-Cunningham B.G., Best V. Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing. Trends in Amplification 2008, 12:283-299.
66. Song J., Skoe E., Banai K., Kraus N. Perception of speech in noise: neural correlates. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:2268-2279.
67. Strait D., Parbery-Clark A., Hittner E., Kraus N. Musical training during early childhood enhances the neural encoding of speech in noise. Brain and Language 2012, 123:191-201.
68. Strouse A., Ashmead D., Ohde R., Grantham D. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1998, 104:2385-2399.
69. Suga N. Role of corticofugal feedback in hearing. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 2008, 194:169-183.
70. Suga N., Ma X. Multiparametric corticofugal modulation and plasticity in the auditory system. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2003, 4:783-794.
71. Summers V., Leek M.R. The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95:3518-3528.
72. Summers V., Leek M.R. F0 processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 1998, 41:1294-1306.
73. Syka J. Plastic changes in the central auditory system after hearing loss, restoration of function, and during learning. Physiological Reviews 2002, 82:601-636.
74. Tyler R.S., Hall J.W., Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C., Patterson R.D. Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1984, 76:1363-1368.
75. Vander Werff K.R., Burns K.S. Brain stem responses to speech in younger and older adults. Ear and Hearing 2011, 32:168-180.
76. Wang X. Neural coding strategies in auditory cortex. Hearing Research 2007, 229:81-93.
77. Wang J., Salvi R.J., Powers N. Plasticity of response properties of inferior colliculus neurons following acute cochlear damage. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 75:171-183.
78. Wechsler D. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) 1999, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
79. Willott J.F. Changes in frequency representation in the auditory system of mice with age-related hearing impairment. Brain Research 1984, 309:159-162.
80. Willott J.F. Effects of aging, hearing loss, and anatomical location on thresholds of inferior colliculus neurons in C57BL/6 and CBA mice. Journal of Neurophysiology 1986, 56:391-408.
81. Willott J.F. Central physiological correlates of ageing and presbycusis in mice. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 1991, 111:153-156.
82. Willott J. Hearing loss and the inferior colliculus. The Inferior Colliculus 2005, Springer. J.A. Winer, C.E. Schreiner (Eds.).
83. Woodcock R.W., McGrew K.S., Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities 2001, Riverside Publishing, Itasca, IL.
84. Yang L., Pollak G.D., Resler C. GABAergic circuits sharpen tuning curves and modify response properties in the mustache bat inferior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology 1992, 68:1760-1774.
85. Zendel B.R., Alain C. Musicians experience less age-related decline in central auditory processing. Psychology and Aging 2011, 27:410-417.