Enhancement in enzymatic hydrolysis by mechanical refining for pretreated hardwood lignocellulosics

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 147, Issue , 2013, Pages 353-360

  Jones, Brandon W ^a   Venditti, Richard ^a   Park, Sunkyu ^a   Jameel, Hasan ^a   Koo, Bonwook ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biochemical conversion; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Hardwood biomass; Mechanical refining; Pretreatment

Indexed keywords

DIESEL PROPULSION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; HARDWOODS; KRAFT PULP; LIGNIN; REFINING; SUGARS;

BIOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; BIOMASS RECALCITRANCES; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS CONDITIONS; HARDWOOD KRAFT PULP; MECHANICAL REFINING; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; PRE-TREATMENT; WATER RETENTION VALUE;

PULP REFINING;

LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; SUGAR;

CALCIFICATION; CELLULOSE; ENZYME; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMASS; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HYDROLYSIS; LABORATORY; LIQUID; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULP MILL; REDUCTION KINETICS; WATER RETENTION; WOOD PULP;

BIOMASS; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; HARDWOODS; HYDROLYSIS; KRAFT PULPING; LIGNINS; REFINING; SUGARS;

BIOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; HARDWOOD BIOMASS; MECHANICAL REFINING; PRETREATMENT;

BIOMASS; ENZYMES; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; WOOD;

EID: 84883275937     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.030     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Annergren T.E., Hagen N. 7 Industrial beating/refining. Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Technology 2009, vol. 3:121-135. De Gruyter, Berlin.
2. Atic C., Immamoglu S., Valchev I. Determination of specific beating energy-applied on certain pulps in a valley beater. J. Univ. Chem. Technol. Met. 2005, 40(3):199-204.
3. Barakat A., de Vries H., Rouau X. Dry fractionation process as an important step in current and future lignocellulose biorefineries: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 134:362-373.
4. Chen H., Venditti R.A., Jameel H., Park S. Enzymatic hydrolysis of recovered office printing paper with low enzyme dosages to produce fermentable sugars. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 166(5):1121-1136.
5. Chen X., Tao L., Shekiro J., Mohaghaghi A., Decker S., Wang W., Smith H., Park S., Himmel M.E., Tucker M. Improved ethanol yield and reduced Minimum Ethanol Selling Price (MESP) by modifying low severity dilute acid pretreatment with deacetylation and mechanical refining: 1) experimental. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5(60):1-10.
6. Endo T. Bioethanol production from woods with the aid of nanotechnology. Snythesiology 2010, 4(2):270-281.
7. Fan L., Lee Y.H., Beardmore D. The influence of major structural features of cellulose on rate of enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23(2):419-424.
8. Garcia O., Torres A., Colom J., Pastor F., Diaz P., Vidal T. Effect of cellulase-assisted refining on the properties of dried and never-dried eucalyptus pulp. Cellulose 2002, 9(2):115-125.
9. Ghose T. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59(2):257-268.
10. Gonzalez R.W., Treasure T., Phillips R.B., Jameel H., Saloni D. Economics of cellulosic ethanol production: green liquor pretreatment for softwood and hardwood, greenfield and repurpose scenarios. BioResources 2011, 6(3):2551-2567.
11. Himmel M.E., Ding S.-Y., Johnson D.K., Adney W.S., Nimlos M.R., Brady J.W., Foust T.D. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 2007, 315(5813):804-807.
12. Hoeger I.C., Nair S.S., Ragauskas A.J., Deng Y., Rojas O.J., Zhu J. Mechanical deconstruction of lignocellulose cell walls and their enzymatic saccharification. Cellulose 2013, 20(2):807-818.
13. Hui L., Liu Z., Ni Y. Characterization of high-yield pulp (HYP) by the solute exclusion technique. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100(24):6630-6634.
14. Jin Y., Jameel H., Chang H.-M., Phillips R. Green liquor pretreatment of mixed hardwood for ethanol production in a repurposed kraft pulp mill. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2010, 30(1):86-104.
15. Kerekes R.J. Characterizing refining action in PFI mills. Tappi J. 2005, 4(3):9-13.
16. Klinke H.B., Thomsen A., Ahring B.K. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 66(1):10-26.
17. Koo B.-W., Treasure T.H., Jameel H., Phillips R.B., Chang H.-m., Park S. Reduction of enzyme dosage by oxygen delignification and mechanical refining for enzymatic hydrolysis of green liquor-pretreated hardwood. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2011, 165(3-4):832-844.
18. Leu S.-Y., Zhu J. Substrate-related factors affecting enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses: our recent understanding. BioEnergy Res. 2012, 6(2):405-415.
19. OpTest Equipment Inc, 1999. In: Operation Manual. The Fiber Quality Analyzer [Code LDA02], pp. 1-85.
20. Park S., Venditti R.A., Jameel H., Pawlak J.J. Changes in pore size distribution during the drying of cellulose fibers as measured by differential scanning calorimetry. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66(1):97-103.
21. Park S., Venditti R.A., Jameel H., Pawlak J.J. Hard to remove water in cellulose fibers characterized by high resolution thermogravimetric analysis-methods development. Cellulose 2006, 13(1):23-30.
22. Sluiter A., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D. Determination of extractives in biomass 2005, LAP, 1617.
23. Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J., Templeton D., Crocker D. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass 2008, LAP.
24. Smook G.A. Handbook for Pulp & Paper Technologists 1982, Tappi Atlanta, GA, USA.
25. Sultana A., Kumar A. Optimal configuration and combination of multiple lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks delivery to a biorefinery. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(21):9947-9956.
26. Tao L., Chen X., Aden A., Kuhn E., Himmel M.E., Tucker M., Franden M.A.A., Zhang M., Johnson D.K., Dowe N. Improved ethanol yield and reduced minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) by modifying low severity dilute acid pretreatment with deacetylation and mechanical refining: 2) techno-economic analysis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5(69):1-11.
27. TAPPI T 236 cm-85, 1993. Kappa number of pulp. TAPPI Test Methods. Atlanta, GA, USA.
28. TAPPI T 200 sp-01, 2001. Laboratory beating of pulp (Valley beater method). TAPPI Test Methods. Atlanta, GA, USA.
29. TAPPI T 248 sp-08, 2008. Laboratory beating of pulp (PFI mill method). TAPPI Test Methods. Atlanta, GA, USA.
30. TAPPI UM 256. 2011. Water retention value (WRV). TAPPI Test Method. Atlanta, GA, USA.
31. Wu S.-F., Chang H.-M., Jameel H., Philips R. Effect of additives on polysaccharide retention in green liquor pretreatment of loblolly pine for enzymatic hydrolysis. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2012, 32(4):317-327.
32. Yu Z., Jameel H., Chang H.-M., Park S. The effect of delignification of forest biomass on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(19):9083-9089.
33. Zhao X., Zhang L., Liu D. Biomass recalcitrance. part ii: fundamentals of different pretreatments to increase the enzymatic digestibility of lignocellulose. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2012, 6(5):561-579.
34. Zheng Y., Pan Z., Zhang R. Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2009, 2(3):51-68.
35. Zhu W., Zhu J., Gleisner R., Pan X. On energy consumption for size-reduction and yields from subsequent enzymatic saccharification of pretreated lodgepole pine. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(8):2782-2792.