Mechanical deconstruction of lignocellulose cell walls and their enzymatic saccharification

Cellulose

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 807-818

  Hoeger, Ingrid C ^a   Nair, Sandeep S ^b   Ragauskas, Arthur J ^b,c   Deng, Yulin ^b,d   Rojas, Orlando J ^a   Zhu, J Y ^e  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^e FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Cell wall deconstruction; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Grinding; Lignocellulose nanofibrils; Lignocelluloses; Nanocellulose; Nanofibers; Nanofibrils; Saccharification; Size reduction

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; CELLS; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; CYTOLOGY; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; GRINDING (MACHINING); KRAFT PULP; LIGNIN; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOFIBERS; SOFTWOODS;

BLEACHED SOFTWOOD KRAFT PULP; CELL WALLS; ENZYMATIC SACCHARIFICATION; LIGNOCELLULOSES; MECHANICAL TREATMENTS; NANO-FIBRILS; SIZE REDUCTIONS; WATER RETENTION VALUE;

SACCHARIFICATION;

ADSORPTION; CELL WALLS; CYTOLOGY; ENZYMOLYSIS; GRINDING; KRAFT PULPS; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MOISTURE CONTENT; SACCHARIFICATION;

EID: 84874545830     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-9867-9     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agarwal UP, Reiner RS, Ralph SA (2010) Celulose I crystallinity determination using FT-Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17(4): 721-733.
2. Ahola S, Turon X, Österberg M, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2008) Enzymatic hydrolysis of native cellulose nanofibrils and other cellulose model films: effect of surface structure. Langmuir 24(20): 11592-11599.
3. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibres: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84(3): 975-983.
4. Bozell JJ, Petersen GR (2010) Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates: the US department of energy's "top 10" revisited. Green Chem 12(4): 539-554.
5. Chai X-S, Zhu JY, Li J (2001) A simple and rapid method to determine hexeneuronic acid groups in chemical pulps. J Pulp Paper Sci 27(5): 165-170.
6. Cheng Q, Wang S, Rials TG, Lee SH (2007) Physical and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol and polypropylene composite materials reinforced with fibril aggregates isolated from regenerated cellulose fibers. Cellulose 14(6): 593-602.
7. Dasari RK, Berson RE (2007) The effect of particle size on hydrolysis reaction rates and rheological properties in cellulosic slurries. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137: 289-299.
8. Dekker J (2003) New insights in beating leading to innovative beating techniques. PIRA 2003 refining conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
9. Endo T (2010) Bioethanol production from woods with the aid of nanotechnology. Synthesiology 4(2): 270-281.
10. Gupta R, Lee YY (2009) Pretreatment of hybrid poplar by aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol Prog 25: 357-364.
11. Hartman RR (1985) Mechanical treatment of pulp fibers for paper property development. In: Punton V (ed) The 8th fundamental research symposium: paper making materials. Mechanical Engineering Publications Limited, Oxford, pp 413-442.
12. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino TD (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9: 1579-1585.
13. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315(5813): 804-807.
14. Hu F, Jung S, Ragauskas A (2012) Pseudo-lignin formation and its impact on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 117: 7-12.
15. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys Mater Sci Process 89: 461-466.
16. Kallavus U, Gravitis J (1995) A comparative investigation of the ultrastructure of steam exploded wood with light, scanning and transmission electron-microscopy. Holzforschung 49(2): 182-188.
17. Kerekes RJ (2005) Characterizing refining actions: linking the process to refining results. In: PIRA 2005 refining conference, Barcelona, Spain.
18. Koo BW, Treasure TH, Jameel H, Phillips RB, Chang HM, Park S (2011) Reduction of enzyme dosage by oxygen delignification and mechanical refining for enzymatic hydrolysis of green liquor-pretreated hardwood. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 165(3-4): 832-844.
19. Laine J, Stenius P (1997) Effect of charge on the fiber and paper properties. Pap Puu 79: 257-266.
20. Lan TQ, Lou H, Zhu JY (2012) Enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses should be conducted at elevated pH 5. 2-6. 2. BioEner Res. doi: 10. 1007/s12155-012-9273-4.
21. Lee SH, Chang F, Inoue S, Endo T (2010) Increase in enzyme accessibility by generation of nanospace in cell wall supramolecular structure. Bioresour Technol 101(19): 7218-7223.
22. Leu S-Y, Zhu JY (2012) Substrate related factors affecting enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses: our recent understanding. BioEner Res. doi: 10. 1007/s12155-012-9276-1.
23. Liu H, Zhu JY, Chai XS (2011) In situ, rapid, and temporally resolved measurements of cellulase adsorption onto lignocellulosic substrates by UV-vis spectrophotometry. Langmuir 27(1): 272-278.
24. Luo X, Zhu JY (2011) Effects of drying-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Enzym Microb Technol 48(1): 92-99.
25. Luo X, Gleisner R, Tian S, Negron J, Horn E, Pan XJ, Zhu JY (2010) Evaluation of mountain beetle infested lodgepole pine for cellulosic ethanol production by SPORL pretreatment. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(17): 8258-8266.
26. Luo X, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Zhan HY (2011) Effect of wet pressing-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Cellulose 18: 1339-1344.
27. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN (1999) Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15: 804-816.
28. Martin-Sampedro R, Filpponen I, Hoeger IC, Zhu JY, Laine J, Rojas OJ (2012) Rapid and complete enzyme hydrolysis of ligocellulosic nanofibrils. ACS Macro Lett 1(1): 1321-1325.
29. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow A, Graham RL, Stokes B, Erbach DC (2005) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: The technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak ridge national laboratory report, ORNL/TM-2005/66, US Dept of Energy.
30. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29: 786-794.
31. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beauchemin KA (1997) Lignin impact on fiber degradation. 3. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem 45(5): 1823-1828.
32. Sinitsyn AP, Gusakov AV, Vlasenko EY (1991) Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 30: 43-59.
33. Siwiö J, Kärenlampil P (1998) Pits as natural irregularities in softwood fibers. Wood Fiber Sci 30: 27-39.
34. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ (2011) A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18(4): 1097-1111.
35. Sun Y, Cheng JY (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1): 1-11.
36. TAPPI (2009) TAPPI test methods. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry, Atlanta.
37. Wang QQ, He Z, Zhu Z, Zhang Y-HP, Ni Y, Luo XL, Zhu JY (2012a) Evaluations of cellulose accessibilities of lignocelluloses by solute exclusion and protein adsorption techniques. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(2): 381-389.
38. Wang QQ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Kuster TA, Baxa U, McNeil SE (2012b) Morphological development of cellulose fibrils of a bleached eucalyptus pulp by mechanical fibrillation. Cellulose 19(5): 1631-1643.
39. Wang ZJ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Chen KF (2012c) Ethanol production form poplar wood the rough enzymatic saccharification and fermentation by dilute acid and SPORL pretreatments. Fuel 95: 606-614.
40. Weise U, Maloney T, Paulapuro H (1996) Quantification of water in difference states of interaction with wood pulp fibres. Cellulose 3: 189-202.
41. Zhu JY (2011) Physical pretreatment-woody biomass size-reduction-for forest biorefinery. In: Zhu JY, Zhang X, Pan XJ (eds) Sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and fibers from forest biomass. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 89-107.
42. Zhu J, Wang G, Pan X, Gleisner R (2009a) Specific surface to evaluate the efficiencies of milling and pretreatment of wood for enzymatic saccharification. Chem Eng Sci 64(3): 474-485.
43. Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Wang GS, Gleisner R (2009b) Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol 100(8): 2411-2418.
44. Zhu W, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Pan XJ (2010) On energy consumption for size-reduction and yield from subsequent enzymatic sacchrification of pretreated lodgepole pine. Bioresour Technol 101(8): 2782-2792.
45. Zhu JY, Luo X, Tian S, Gleisner R, Negrone J, Horn E (2011a) Efficient ethanol production from beetle-killed lodgepole pine using SPORL technology and Saccharomyces cerevisiae without detoxification. Tappi J 10(5): 9-18.
46. Zhu JY, Verrill SP, Liu H, Herian VL, Pan XJ, Rockwood DL (2011b) On polydispersity of plant biomass recalcitrance and its effects on pretreatment optimization for sugar production. BioEner Res 4(3): 201-210.