The effect of substrate surface nanotopography on the behavior of multipotnent mesenchymal stromal cells and osteoblasts

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 35, 2013, Pages 8851-8859

  Fiedler, Jörg ^a   Özdemir, Burcin ^a   Bartholomä, Jochen ^a   Plettl, Alfred ^a   Brenner, Rolf E ^a   Ziemann, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Cell substrate interaction; Lithography; Nanotopography; Osteogenic differentiation; Proliferation

Indexed keywords

CELL-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS; CONTROLLABLE DIAMETER; INTERPARTICLE DISTANCES; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MULTIPOTENT MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; PROLIFERATION;

ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); LITHOGRAPHY; NANOSTRUCTURES; SILICON WAFERS;

OSTEOBLASTS;

FLUORESCEIN ISOTHIOCYANATE; GOLD NANOPARTICLE; PHALLOIDIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; VINCULIN;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL TYPE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; MESENCHYMAL STROMA CELL; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OSTEOBLAST; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TOPOGRAPHY;

ADHESION; CELL-SUBSTRATE INTERACTION; LITHOGRAPHY; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; PROLIFERATION;

CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84883239739     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.010     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Perez-Castillejos R. Replication of the 3D architecture of tissues. Mater Today 2010, 13(1):32-41.
2. Mendonça G., Mendonça D.B.S., Aragão F.J.L., Cooper L.F. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008, 29(28):3822-3835.
3. Watari S., Hayashi K., Wood J.A., Russell P., Nealey P.F., Murphy C.J., et al. Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. Biomaterials 2012, 33(1):128-136.
4. Kolind K., Dolatshahi-Pirouz A., Lovmand J., Pedersen F.S., Foss M., Besenbacher F. Acombinatorial screening of human fibroblast responses on micro-structured surfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31(35):9182-9191.
5. Teo B.K., Goh S.H., Kustandi T.S., Loh W.W., Low H.Y., Yim E.K. The effect of micro and nanotopography on endocytosis in drug and gene delivery systems. Biomaterials 2011, 32(36):9866-9875.
6. Bettinger C.J., Langer R., Borenstein J.T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2009, 48(30):5406-5415.
7. Stevens M.M., George J.H. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005, 310(5751):1135-1138.
8. Mauney J., Volloch V. Progression of human bone marrow stromal cells into both osteogenic and adipogenic lineages is differentially regulated by structural conformation of collagen I matrix via distinct signaling pathways. Matrix Biol 2009, 28(5):239-250.
9. Zhu X., Chen J., Scheideler L., Altebaeumer T., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Kern D. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron- and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces. Cells Tissues Organs 2004, 178(1):13-22.
10. Nebe J.G., Luethen F., Lange R., Beck U. Interface interactions of osteoblasts with structured titanium and the correlation between physicochemical characteristics and cell biological parameters. Macromol Biosci 2007, 7(5):567-578.
11. Lamers E., Walboomers X.F., Domanski M., Prodanov L., Melis J., Luttge R., et al. Invitro and invivo evaluation of the inflammatory response to nanoscale grooved substrates. Nanomedicine 2012, 8(3):308-317.
12. 2 overcomes the biological dilemma of osteoblasts. Dent Mater 2010, 26(4):275-287.
13. Kantawong F., Burgess K.E.V., Jayawardena K., Hart A., Burchmore R.J., Gadegaard N., et al. Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling. Biomaterials 2009, 30(27):4723-4731.
14. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6(12):997-1003.
15. Teixeira A.I., Nealey P.F., Murphy C.J. Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. JBiomed Mater Res A 2004, 71(3):369-376.
16. Yim E.K.F., Reano R.M., Pang S.W., Yee A.F., Chen C.S., Leong K.W. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2005, 26(26):5405-5413.
17. Purwaningsih L., Schoen T., Wolfram T., Pacholski C., Spatz J.P. Fabrication of multi-parametric platforms based on nanocone arrays for determination of cellular response. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2011, 2:545-551.
18. Di Mundo R., Nardulli M., Milella A., Favia P., d'Agostino R., Gristina R. Cell adhesion on nanotextured slippery superhydrophobic substrates. Langmuir 2011, 27(8):4914-4921.
19. Heydarkhan-Hagvall S., Choi C.-H., Dunn J., Heydarkhan S., Schenke-Layland K., MacLellan W.R., et al. Influence of systematically varied nano-scale topography on cell morphology and adhesion. Cell Commun Adhes 2007, 14(5):181-194.
20. Lohmüller T., Aydin D., Schwieder M., Morhard C., Louban I., Pacholski C., et al. Nanopatterning by block copolymer micelle nanolithography and bioinspired applications. Biointerphases 2011, 6(1):MR1-12.
21. Spatz J.P., Mössmer S., Hartmann C., Möller M., Herzog T., Krieger M., et al. Ordered deposition of inorganic clusters from micellar block copolymer films. Langmuir 2000, 16(2):407-415.
22. Kästle G., Boyen H.G., Weigl F., Lengl G., Herzog T., Ziemann P., et al. Micellar nanoreactors- preparation and characterization of hexagonally ordered arrays of metallic nanodots. Adv Funct Mater 2003, 13(11):853-861.
23. Bansmann J., Kielbassa S., Hoster H., Weigl F., Boyen H.G., Wiedwald U., et al. Controlling the interparticle spacing of Au-salt loaded micelles and Au nanoparticles on flat surfaces. Langmuir 2007, 23(20):10150-10155.
24. Härtling T., Seidenstücker A., Olk P., Plettl A., Ziemann P., Eng L.M. Controlled photochemical particle growth in two-dimensional ordered metal nanoparticle arrays. Nanotechnology 2010, 21(14):145309.
25. Manzke A., Vogel N., Weiss C.K., Ziener U., Plettl A., Landfester K., et al. Arrays of size and distance controlled platinum nanoparticles fabricated by a colloidal method. Nanoscale 2011, 3(6):2523-2528.
26. Weigl F., Fricker S., Boyen H.G., Dietrich C., Koslowski B., Plettl A., et al. From self-organized masks to nanotips: a new concept for the preparation of densely packed arrays of diamond field emitters. Diam & Rel Mat 2006, 15(10):1689-1694.
27. Mayr-Wohlfart U., Waltenberger J., Hausser H., Kessler S., Günther K.P., Dehio C., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates chemotactic migration of primary human osteoblasts. Bone 2002, 30(3):472-477.
28. Fiedler J., Röderer G., Günther K.P., Brenner R.E. BMP-2, BMP-4, and PDGF-bb stimulate chemotactic migration of primary human mesenchymal progenitor cells. JCell Biochem 2002, 87(3):305-312.
29. Schneider C.A., Rasband W.S., Eliceiri K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012, 9(7):671-675.
30. Quéré D. Wetting and roughness. Annu Rev Mater Res 2008, 38:71-99.
31. Abrahamsson I., Berglundh T., Linder E., Lang N.P., Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004, 15(4):381-392.
32. Schwarz F., Wieland M., Schwartz Z., Zhao G., Rupp F., Geis-Gerstorfer J., et al. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. JBiomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009, 88(2):544-557.
33. Eriksson C., Nygren H., Ohlson K. Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials 2004, 25(19):4759-4766.
34. Meirelles L., Arvidsson A., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Increased bone formation to unstable nano rough titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007, 18(3):326-332.
35. Khang D.Y., Xiao J., Kocabas C., MacLaren S., Banks T., Jiang H., et al. Molecular scale buckling mechanics in individual aligned single-wall carbon nanotubes on elastomeric substrates. Nano Lett 2008, 8(1):124-130.
36. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett 2007, 7(6):1686-1691.
37. Kanchanawong P., Shtengel G., Pasapera A.M., Ramko E.B., Davidson M.W., Hess H.F., et al. Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature 2010, 468(7323):580-584.
38. Curtis A.S., Wilkinson C.D. Reactions of cells to topography. JBiomater Sci Polym Ed 1998, 9(12):1313-1329.
39. Fujita S., Ohshima M., Iwata H. Time-lapse observation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns. JR Soc Interface 2009, 6(Suppl.3):S269-S277.
40. Wang J.H., Thampatty B.P., Lin J.S., Im H.J. Mechanoregulation of gene expression in fibroblasts. Gene 2007, 391(1-2):1-15.
41. Passeri G., Cacchioli A., Ravanetti F., Galli C., Elezi E., Macaluso G.M. Adhesion pattern and growth of primary human osteoblastic cells on five commercially available titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21(7):756-765.
42. Ko Y.G., Yu S.M., Park S.J., Chun H.J., Kim C.H. Characterization of surface properties and cytocompatibility of ion-etched chitosan films. Langmuir 2012, 28(18):7223-7232.
43. Darling E.M., Topel M., Zauscher S., Vail T.P., Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. JBiomech 2008, 41(2):454-464.
44. Titushkin I., Cho M. Modulation of cellular mechanics during osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biophys J 2007, 93(10):3693-3702.
45. Zouani O.F., Chanseau C., Brouillaud B., Bareille R., Deliane F., Foulc M.P., et al. Altered nanofeature size dictates stem cell differentiation. JCell Sci 2012, 125(Pt 5):1217-1224.
46. Oh S., Brammer K.S., Li Y.S.J., Teng D., Engler A.J., Chien S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106(7):2130-2135.
47. Singh A.V., Ferri M., Tamplenizza M., Borghi F., Divitini G., Ducati C., et al. Bottom-up engineering of the surface roughness of nanostructured cubic zirconia to control cell adhesion. Nanotechnology 2012, 23(47):475101.
48. Biggs M.J., Richards R.G., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine 2010, 6(5):619-633.
49. Biggs M.J., Dalby M.J. Focal adhesions in osteoneogenesis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010, 224(12):1441-1453.
50. Lim J.Y., Hansen J.C., Siedlecki C.A., Runt J., Donahue H.J. Human foetal osteoblastic cell response to polymer-demixed nanotopographic interfaces. JR Soc Interface 2005, 2(2):97-108.
51. Dalby M.J., Childs S., Riehle M.O., Johnstone H.J., Affrossman S., Curtis A.S. Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biomaterials 2003, 24(6):927-935.
52. Biggs M.J., Richards R.G., Gadegaard N., Wilkinson C.D., Dalby M.J. The effects of nanoscale pits on primary human osteoblast adhesion formation and cellular spreading. JMater Sci Mater Med 2007, 18(2):399-404.
53. McNamara L.E., McMurray R.J., Biggs M.J., Kantawong F., Oreffo R.O.C., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. JTissue Eng 2010, 1(1):120623.
54. Strehl R., Schumacher K., de Vries U., Minuth W.W. Proliferating cells versus differentiated cells in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2002, 8(1):37-42.
55. Bigerelle M., Giljean S., Anselme K. Existence of a typical threshold in the response of human mesenchymal stem cells to a peak and valley topography. Acta Biomater 2011, 7(9):3302-3311.
56. Tanaka M. Design of novel 2D and 3D biointerfaces using self-organization to control cell behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011, 1810(3):251-258.