Existence of a typical threshold in the response of human mesenchymal stem cells to a peak and valley topography

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3302-3311

  Bigerelle, M ^a   Giljean, S ^b   Anselme, K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE HAUTE ALSACE   (France)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; hMSCs; Modelling; Roughness; Titanium

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; ELECTRIC DISCHARGE MACHINING; ELECTRIC DISCHARGES; FRACTAL DIMENSION; STEM CELLS; TITANIUM;

CELLS ADHESION; ELECTRICAL DISCHARGE MACHINING; HMSC; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; ISOTROPICS; MODELING; SELF-AFFINE; SURFACE FEATURE; TITANIA; VALLEY TOPOGRAPHY;

SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

TITANIUM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL SIZE; CYTOSKELETON; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN CELL CULTURE; ISOTROPIC ROUGHNESS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; METAL IMPLANTATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF AFFINE TOPOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 79961013534     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Martin JY et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
2. Links J et al. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998;19:2219-32.
3. Soboyejo WO et al. Interactions between MC3T3-E1 cells and textured Ti6l4V surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:56-72. (Pubitemid 34831394)
4. Chen J et al. Cell/surface interactions and adhesion on Ti-6Al-AV: effects of surface texture. J Biomed Mater Res B 2007;82:360-73. (Pubitemid 47106241)
5. Kim M-J, Kim C-W, Lim YJ, Heo SJ. Microrough titanium surface affects biologic response in MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79A:1023-32. (Pubitemid 44915921)
6. Ball M, Grant DM, Scotchford CA. The effect of different surface morphology and roughness on osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86A:637-47.
7. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-54. (Pubitemid 46734313)
8. Zinger O et al. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale dependant morphology. Biomaterials 2004;25:2695-711. (Pubitemid 38201297)
9. Ismail FSM et al. The influence of surface chemistry and topography on the contact guidance of MG63 osteoblast cells. J Mat Sci Mater Med 2007;18:705-14. (Pubitemid 46764008)
10. Lu J, Rao MP, MacDonald NC, Khang D, Webster TJ. Improved endothelial cell adhesion and proliferation on patterned titanium surfaces with rationally designed, micrometer to nanometer features. Acta Biomater 2008;4:192-201. (Pubitemid 350131559)
11. Khang D, Lu J, Yao C, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008;29:970-83. (Pubitemid 50020176)
12. Matschegewski C et al. Cell architecture-cell function dependencies on titanium arrays with regular geometry. Biomaterials 2010;31:5722-40.
13. Galli C et al. Comparison of human mandibular osteoblasts grown on two commercially available titanium implant surfaces. J Periodontol 2004;76:364-72. (Pubitemid 40668381)
14. Baharloo B, Textor M, Brunette DM. Substratum roughness alters the growth, area, and focal adhesions of epithelial cells, and their proximity to titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;74A:12-22. (Pubitemid 41099246)
15. Kim M-J, Choi M-U, Kim C-W. Activation of phospholipase D1 by surface roughness of titanium in MG63 osteoblast-like cell. Biomaterials 2006;27:5502-11. (Pubitemid 44176144)
16. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Topography effects of pure titanium substrates on human osteoblast long-term adhesion. Acta Biomater 2005;1:211-22. (Pubitemid 43348802)
17. Dalby MJ et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007;6:997-1003. (Pubitemid 350210577)
18. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion. J Mat Sci Mater Med 2006;17:471-9. (Pubitemid 43827977)
19. Bigerelle M, Anselme K. Bootstrap analysis of the relation between initial adhesive events and long-term cellular functions of human osteoblasts cultured on biocompatible metallic substrates. Acta Biomater 2005;1:499-510. (Pubitemid 43348765)
20. Meredith DO, Riehle MO, Curtis ASG, Richards RG. Is surface chemical composition important for orthopaedic implant materials? J Mat Sci Mater Med 2007;18:405-13.
21. Wieland M, Textor M, Chehroudi B, Brunette DM. Synergistic interaction of topographic features in the production of bone-like nodules on Ti surfaces by rat osteoblasts. Biomaterials 2005;26:1119-30. (Pubitemid 39286821)
22. 2-coated epoxy replicas with identical dual-type surface topographies used in cell culture assays. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;88:12-22.
23. Arnold M et al. Induction of cell polarization and migration by a gradient of nanoscale variations in adhesive ligand spacing. Nano Lett 2008;8:2063-9.
24. Kunzler TP, Drobek T, Schuler M, Spencer ND. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 2007;28:2175-82. (Pubitemid 46216454)
25. Kunzler TP, Huwiler C, Drobek T, Voros J, Spencer ND. Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. Biomaterials 2007;28:5000-6. (Pubitemid 47362350)
26. Simon KA et al. Enhancing cell adhesion and confinement by gradient nanotopography. JACS 2007;129:4892-3. (Pubitemid 46651359)
27. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Modelling approach in cell/material interactions studies. Biomaterials 2006;27:1187-99. (Pubitemid 41739542)
28. Bigerelle M, Mazeran PE, Gong W, Giljean S, Anselme K. A method to determine the spatial scale implicated in adhesion. Application on human cell adhesion on fractal isotropic rough surfaces. J Adhesion, in press.
29. Anselme K et al. In vitro control of human bone marrow stromal cells for bone tissue engineering. Tissue eng 2002;8:941-53.
30. Giljean S, Bigerelle M, Anselme K. A multiscale topography analysis of grinded stainless steel and titanium alloys. P I Mech Eng B J Eng 2007;221:1407-20.
31. Najjar D, Bigerelle M. The computer-based bootstrap method as a tool to select a relevant surface roughness parameter. Wear 2003;254:450-60. (Pubitemid 36678879)
32. Faghihi S et al. Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion. Biomaterials 2007;28:3887-95. (Pubitemid 47048363)
33. He J et al. The anatase phase of nanotopography titania plays an important role on osteoblast cell morphology and proliferation. J Mat Sci Mater Med 2008;19:3465-72.
34. Monsees TK et al. Effects of different titanium alloys and nanosize surface patterning on adhesion, differentiation, and orientation of osteoblast like cells. Cells Tissue Organs 2005;180:81-95. (Pubitemid 41197105)
35. Tambasco de Oliveira P, Nanci A. Nanotexturing of titanium-based surfaces upregulates expression of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin by cultured osteogenic cells. Biomaterials 2003;25:403-13. (Pubitemid 37329691)
36. Park JY, Lee DH, Lee EJ, Lee SH. Study of cellular behaviors on concave and convex microstructures fabricated from elastic PDMS membranes. Lab on a Chip 2009;9:2043-9.
37. Dunn GA, Heath JP. A new hypothesis of contact guidance in tissue cells. Exp Cell Res 1976;101:1-14.
38. Smeal RM, Rabbitt R, Biran R, Tresco PA. Substrate curvature influences the direction of nerve outgrowth. Ann Biomed Eng 2005;33:376-82. (Pubitemid 40536669)
39. Thery M, Pepin A, Dressaire E, Chen Y, Bornens M. Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil Cytoskel 2006;63:341-55. (Pubitemid 43787719)
40. James J, Goluch ED, Hu H, Liu C, Mrksich M. Subcellular curvature at the perimeter of micropatterned cells influences lamellipodial distribution and cell polarity. Cell Motility Cytoskel 2008;65:841-52.
41. Sanz-Herrera JA, Moreo P, Garcia-Aznar JM, Doblare M. On the effect of substrate curvature on cell mechanics. Biomaterials 2009;30:6674.
42. Frame MD, Sarelius IH. Flow-induced cytoskeletal changes in endothelial cells growing on curved surfaces. Microcirculation 2010;7:419-27.
43. Ingber DE. Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J 2006;20:811-27. (Pubitemid 44943939)
44. Ochsner M, Textor M, Vogel V, Smith ML. Dimensionality controls cytoskeleton assembly and metabolism of fibroblast cells in response to rigidity and shape. PLoS One 2010;5:e9445.
45. Anselme K, Bigerelle M. Role of materials surface topography on mammalian cell response. International Materials Review, in press.
46. Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Schwartz Z. Mechanisms involved in osteoblast response to implant surface morphology. Annu Rev Mater Res 2001;31:357-71. (Pubitemid 33073854)
47. Boyan BD et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cells Mater 2003;6:22-7. (Pubitemid 38851419)