Automated tracking of mitotic spindle pole positions shows that LGN is required for spindle rotation but not orientation maintenance

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 16, 2013, Pages 2643-2655

  Corrigan, Adam M ^a,b   Shrestha, Roshan L ^a   Zulkipli, Ihsan ^a   Hiroi, Noriko ^c   Liu, Yingjun ^a   Tamura, Naoka ^a   Yang, Bing ^a   Patel, Jessica ^a   Funahashi, Akira ^c   Donald, Athene ^b   Draviam, Viji M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Microtubule; Mitosis; Spindle orientation

Indexed keywords

DYNACTIN; DYNEIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MOLECULAR MOTOR;

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; AUTOMATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL POLARITY; CELL SHAPE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOME; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EPITHELIUM CELL; HELA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MACROMOLECULE; MICROSCOPY; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; ROTATION; SPINDLE POLE BODY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME LAPSE IMAGING;

MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; SPINDLE ORIENTATION;

EPITHELIAL CELLS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOBLOTTING; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, VIDEO; RNA, SMALL INTERFERING; ROTATION; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84883213373     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.25671     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Mapelli M, Gonzalez C. On the inscrutable role of Inscuteable: structural basis and functional implications for the competitive binding of NuMA and Inscuteable to LGN. Open Biol 2012; 2:120102-5; PMID:22977735; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.120102
2. Noatynska A, Gotta M, Meraldi P. Mitotic spindle (DIS)orientation and DISease: cause or consequence? J Cell Biol 2012; 199:1025-35; PMID:23266953; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201209015
3. O'Connell CB, Wang YL. Mammalian spindle orientation and position respond to changes in cell shape in a dynein-dependent fashion. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:1765-74; PMID:10793150; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.5.1765
4. Wühr M, Tan ES, Parker SK, Detrich HW 3rd, Mitchison TJ. A model for cleavage plane determination in early amphibian and fish embryos. Curr Biol 2010; 20:2040-5; PMID:21055946; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.024
5. Quyn AJ, Appleton PL, Carey FA, Steele RJC, Barker N, Clevers H, et al. Spindle orientation bias in gut epithelial stem cell compartments is lost in precancerous tissue. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6:175-81; PMID:20144789; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2009.12.007
6. Luxenburg C, Pasolli HA, Williams SE, Fuchs E. Developmental roles for Srf, cortical cytoskeleton and cell shape in epidermal spindle orientation. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:203-14; PMID:21336301; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2163
7. Théry M, Jiménez-Dalmaroni A, Racine V, Bornens M, Jülicher F. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 2007; 447:493-6; PMID:17495931; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature05786
8. Théry M, Racine V, Pépin A, Piel M, Chen Y, Sibarita J-B, et al. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:947-53; PMID:16179950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1307
9. Fink J, Carpi N, Betz T, Bétard A, Chebah M, Azioune A, et al. External forces control mitotic spindle positioning. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:771-8; PMID:21666685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2269
10. Fernandez P, Maier M, Lindauer M, Kuffer C, Storchova Z, Bausch AR. Mitotic spindle orients perpendicular to the forces imposed by dynamic shear. PLoS One 2011; 6:e28965; PMID:22220200; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0028965
11. Draviam VM, Shapiro I, Aldridge B, Sorger PK. Misorientation and reduced stretching of aligned sister kinetochores promote chromosome missegregation in EB1-or APC-depleted cells. EMBO J 2006; 25:2814-27; PMID:16763565; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601168
12. Samora CP, Mogessie B, Conway L, Ross JL, Straube A, McAinsh AD. MAP4 and CLASP1 operate as a safety mechanism to maintain a stable spindle position in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:1040-50; PMID:21822276; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/ncb2297
13. Dunsch AK, Hammond D, Lloyd J, Schermelleh L, Gruneberg U, Barr FA. Dynein light chain 1 and a spindle-associated adaptor promote dynein asymmetry and spindle orientation. J Cell Biol 2012; 198:1039-54; PMID:22965910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201202112
14. Kaji N, Muramoto A, Mizuno K. LIM kinasemediated cofilin phosphorylation during mitosis is required for precise spindle positioning. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:4983-92; PMID:18079118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M708644200
15. Mitsushima M, Toyoshima F, Nishida E. Dual role of Cdc42 in spindle orientation control of adherent cells. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:2816-27; PMID:19273597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01713-08
16. Matsumura S, Hamasaki M, Yamamoto T, Ebisuya M, Sato M, Nishida E, et al. ABL1 regulates spindle orientation in adherent cells and mammalian skin. Nat Commun 2012; 3:626; PMID:22252550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1634
17. Toyoshima F, Matsumura S, Morimoto H, Mitsushima M, Nishida E. PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 regulates spindle orientation in adherent cells. Dev Cell 2007; 13:796-811; PMID:18061563; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.014
18. Toyoshima F, Nishida E. Integrin-mediated adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in an EB1-and myosin X-dependent manner. EMBO J 2007; 26:1487-98; PMID:17318179; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601599
19. Kiyomitsu T, Cheeseman IM. Chromosome-and spindle-pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14:311-7; PMID:22327364; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2440
20. Kitagawa D, Kohlmaier G, Keller D, Strnad P, Balestra FR, Flückiger I, et al. Spindle positioning in human cells relies on proper centriole formation and on the microcephaly proteins CPAP and STIL. J Cell Sci 2011; 124:3884-93; PMID:22100914; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.089888
21. Rebollo E, Roldán M, Gonzalez C. Spindle alignment is achieved without rotation after the first cell cycle in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts. Development 2009; 136:3393-7; PMID:19762421; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev. 041822
22. Rebollo E, Sampaio P, Januschke J, Llamazares S, Varmark H, González C. Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev Cell 2007; 12:467-74; PMID:17336911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.01.021
23. Rosenblatt J. Spindle assembly: asters part their separate ways. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7:219-22; PMID:15738974; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb0305-219
24. Gotta M, Ahringer J. Distinct roles for Galpha and Gbetagamma in regulating spindle position and orientation in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:297-300; PMID:11231580; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35060092
25. Grill SW, Howard J, Schäffer E, Stelzer EHK, Hyman AA. The distribution of active force generators controls mitotic spindle position. Science 2003; 301:518-21; PMID:12881570; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1086560
26. Schuh M, Ellenberg J. A new model for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes. Curr Biol 2008; 18:1986-92; PMID:19062278; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.cub.2008.11.022
27. Kamath K, Okouneva T, Larson G, Panda D, Wilson L, Jordan MA. 2-Methoxyestradiol suppresses microtubule dynamics and arrests mitosis without depolymerizing microtubules. Mol Cancer Ther 2006; 5:2225-33; PMID:16985056; http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0113
28. Matov A, Applegate K, Kumar P, Thoma C, Krek W, Danuser G, et al. Analysis of microtubule dynamic instability using a plus-end growth marker. Nat Methods 2010; 7:761-8; PMID:20729842; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1493
29. Piehl M, Cassimeris L. Organization and dynamics of growing microtubule plus ends during early mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 14:916-25; PMID:12631713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E02-09-0607
30. Gunin AG, Mashin IN, Zakharov DA. Proliferation, mitosis orientation and morphogenetic changes in the uterus of mice following chronic treatment with both estrogen and glucocorticoid hormones. J Endocrinol 2001; 169:23-31; PMID:11250643; http://dx.doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1690023
31. Domnitz SB, Wagenbach M, Decarreau J, Wordeman L. MCAK activity at microtubule tips regulates spindle microtubule length to promote robust kinetochore attachment. J Cell Biol 2012; 197:231-7; PMID:22492725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201108147
32. Bakhoum SF, Thompson SL, Manning AL, Compton DA. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:27-35; PMID:19060894; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1809
33. Bakhoum SF, Genovese G, Compton DA. Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 2009; 19:1937-42; PMID:19879145; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.055
34. Kotak S, Busso C, Gönczy P. Cortical dynein is critical for proper spindle positioning in human cells. J Cell Biol 2012; 199:97-110; PMID:23027904; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201203166
35. Busson S, Dujardin D, Moreau A, Dompierre J, De Mey Jr. Dynein and dynactin are localized to astral microtubules and at cortical sites in mitotic epithelial cells. Curr Biol 1998; 8:541-4; PMID:9560347; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/S0960-9822(98)70208-8
36. Collins ES, Balchand SK, Faraci JL, Wadsworth P, Lee WL. Cell cycle-regulated cortical dynein/dynactin promotes symmetric cell division by differential pole motion in anaphase. Mol Biol Cell 2012; 23:3380-90; PMID:22809624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E12-02-0109
37. Kiyomitsu T, Cheeseman IM. Chromosome-and spindle pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 12:311-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2440
38. Peyre E, Jaouen F, Saadaoui M, Haren L, Merdes A, Durbec P, et al. A lateral belt of cortical LGN and NuMA guides mitotic spindle movements and planar division in neuroepithelial cells. J Cell Biol 2011; 193:141-54; PMID:21444683; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201101039
39. Tamura N, Draviam VM. Microtubule plus-ends within a mitotic cell are 'moving platforms' with anchoring, signalling and force-coupling roles. Open Biol 2012; 2:120132; PMID:23226599; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsob.120132
40. Cassimeris L, Morabito J. TOGp, the human homolog of XMAP215/Dis1 is required for centrosome integrity, spindle pole organization, and bipolar spindle assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2003; 15:1580-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E03-07-0544
41. Poser I, Sarov M, Hutchins JRA, Hériché J-K, Toyoda Y, Pozniakovsky A, et al. BAC TransgeneOmics: a high-throughput method for exploration of protein function in mammals. Nat Methods 2008; 5:409-15; PMID:18391959; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1199
42. Moore AT, Rankin KE, von Dassow G, Peris L, Wagenbach M, Ovechkina Y, et al. MCAK associates with the tips of polymerizing microtubules. J Cell Biol 2005; 169:391-7; PMID:15883193; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200411089
43. Applegate KT, Besson S, Matov A, Bagonis MH, Jaqaman K, Danuser G. plusTipTracker: Quantitative image analysis software for the measurement of microtubule dynamics. J Struct Biol 2011; 176:168-84; PMID:21821130; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.07.009
44. Fisher, RA. Statistical Methods and Scientific inference. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1956) (Later additions: 1959; Hafner, New York, 1973).