Composite versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for the anterolateral territory: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Drouin, Ariane ^a   Noiseux, Nicolas ^a,d   Chartrand Lefebvre, Carl ^b,d   Soulez, Gilles ^b,d   Mansour, Samer ^c,d   Tremblay, Jan Alexis ^a   Basile, Fadi ^a   Prieto, Ignacio ^a   Stevens, Louis Mathieu ^a,d  

^a Division of Cardiac Surgery   (Canada)

^b Department of Radiology ^*  (Canada)

^c Division of Cardiology   (Canada)

^d CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiopulmonary bypass; Composite graft; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Doppler velocimetry; Ischemic heart disease; Left internal mammary artery; Long term follow up; Multislice computed tomography angiography; Randomized clinical non inferiority trial; Saphenous vein graft

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY VESSELS; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUEBEC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 84883127289     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-270     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rihal CS, Raco DL, Gersh BJ, Yusuf S. Indications for coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic stable angina: review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Circulation 2003, 108:2439-2445. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000094405.21583.7C, 14623791.
2. Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, Disesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM, Jessen ME, Keeley EC, Lahey SJ, Lange RA, London MJ, Mack MJ, Patel MR, Puskas JD, Sabik JF, Selnes O, Shahian DM, Trost JC, Winniford MD. ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2011, 2011:2610-2642.
3. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E, Peduzzi P, Takaro T, Fisher LD, Kennedy JW, Davis K, Killip T, Norris R, Morris C, Mathur V, Varnauskas E, Chalmers TC. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the coronary artery bypass graft surgery trialists collaboration. Lancet 1994, 344:563-570. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91963-1, 7914958.
4. Favarato ME, Hueb W, Boden WE, Lopes N, Nogueira CR, Takiuti M, Gois AF, Borges JC, Favarato D, Aldrighi JM, Oliveira SA, Ramires JA. Quality of life in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease: a comparative post hoc analyses of medical, angioplasty or surgical strategies-MASS II trial. Int J Cardiol 2007, 116:364-370. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.06.001, 16876891.
5. Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR, Stahle E, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Serruys PW, Colombo A. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 2011, 32:2125-2134. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr213, 21697170.
6. Group BDS, Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, Hardison RM, Kelsey SF, MacGregor JM, Orchard TJ, Chaitman BR, Genuth SM, Goldberg SH, Hlatky MA, Jones TL, Molitch ME, Nesto RW, Sako EY, Sobel BE. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:2503-2515. 2863990, 19502645.
7. Moller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, Andersen LW, Kelbaek H, Madsen JK, Gluud C, Steinbruchel DA. Graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients. Scand Cardiovasc J 2010, 44:161-167. 10.3109/14017430903556286, 20233137.
8. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LAR, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC, Proudfit WL. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986, 314:1-6. 10.1056/NEJM198601023140101, 3484393.
9. Lytle BW. Long-term results of coronary bypass surgery. is the internal mammary artery graft superior?. Postgrad Med 1988, 83:66-67. 71-65.
10. Tremblay JA, Stevens LM, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Chandonnet M, Mansour S, Soulez G, Prieto I, Basile F, Noiseux N. A novel composite coronary bypass graft strategy: the saphenous vein bridge--a pilot study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
11. Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ, Carr JJ, Gerber TC, Hecht HS, Hlatky MA, Hodgson JM, Lauer MS, Miller JM, Morin RL, Mukherjee D, Poon M, Rubin Schwartz GD, . American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:2663-2699. 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.013, 20513611, American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.
12. Laynez-Carnicero A, Estornell-Erill J, Trigo-Bautista A, Valle-Munoz A, Nadal-Barange M, Romaguera-Torres R, Planas Del Viejo A, Corbi-Pascual M, Paya-Serrano R, Ridocci-Soriano F. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Rev Esp Cardiol 2010, 63:161-169. 10.1016/S0300-8932(10)70034-8, 20191700.
13. Lee R, Lim J, Kaw G, Wan G, Ng K, Ho KT. Comprehensive noninvasive evaluation of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients after coronary bypass surgery: accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography compared to invasive coronary angiography. J Cardiovasc Med 2010, 11:81-90.
14. Hamon M, Lepage O, Malagutti P, Riddell JW, Morello R, Agostini D, Hamon M. Diagnostic performance of 16- and 64-section spiral CT for coronary artery bypass graft assessment: meta-analysis. Radiology 2008, 247:679-686. 10.1148/radiol.2473071132, 18403629.
15. Goldman S, Sethi GK, Holman W, Thai H, McFalls E, Ward HB, Kelly RF, Rhenman B, Tobler GH, Bakaeen FG, Huh J, Soltero E, Moursi M, Haime M, Crittenden M, Kasirajan V, Ratliff M, Pett S, Irimpen A, Gunnar W, Thomas D, Fremes S, Moritz T, Reda D, Harrison L, Wagner TH, Wang Y, Planting L, Miller M, Rodriguez Y, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 2011, 305:167-174. 10.1001/jama.2010.1976, 21224458.
16. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, Lucke JC, Baltz JH, Novitzky D, . Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass Study Group On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009, 361:1827-1837. 10.1056/NEJMoa0902905, 19890125, Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass Study Group.
17. Lingaas PS, Hol PK, Lundblad R, Rein KA, Mathisen L, Smith HJ, Andersen R, Thaulow E, Tonnesen TI, Svennevig JL, Hauge SN, Fredriksen PM, Andersen M, Fosse E. Clinical and radiologic outcome of off-pump coronary surgery at 12 months follow-up: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2006, 81:2089-2095. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.003, 16731135.
18. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, Jirasek K, Dvorak J, Votava J, Lisa L, Budesinsky T, Kolesar M, Vanek T, Brucek P. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation 2004, 110:3418-3423. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148139.79580.36, 15557371.
19. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE, . Radial Artery Patency Study I A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:2302-2309. 10.1056/NEJMoa040982, 15564545, Radial Artery Patency Study I.
20. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Huber PR, Block PC, Duke PG, Staples JR, Glas KE, Marshall JJ, Leimbach ME, McCall SA, Petersen RJ, Bailey DE, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004, 291:1841-1849. 10.1001/jama.291.15.1841, 15100202.
21. Buxton BF, Raman JS, Ruengsakulrach P, Gordon I, Rosalion A, Bellomo R, Horrigan M, Hare DL. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 125:1363-1371. 10.1016/S0022-5223(02)73241-8, 12830056.
22. Van Der Meer J, Hillege HL, Van Gilst WH, Brutel De La Riviere A, Dunselman PH, Fidler V, Kootstra GJ, Mulder BJ, Pfisterer M, Lie KI. A comparison of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery. no difference in 1-year occlusion rates and clinical outcome. CABADAS research group of the interuniversity cardiology institute of The Netherlands. Circulation 1994, 90:2367-2374. 10.1161/01.CIR.90.5.2367, 7955195.
23. Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A, Manfredi J, Carone E, Morgan JA, Metra M, Dei Cas L. Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 127:179-184. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.004, 14752429.
24. Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A, Manfredi J, Metra M, Nodari S, Culot L, Dei Cas L. Total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts improves results of coronary surgery in elderly: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2003, 108(Suppl 1):1129-1133.
25. Glineur D, Boodhwani M, Poncelet A, De Kerchove L, Etienne PY, Noirhomme P, Deceuninck P, Michel X, El Khoury G, Hanet C. Comparison of fractional flow reserve of composite Y-grafts with saphenous vein or right internal thoracic arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010, 140:639-645. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.013, 20167333.
26. Hwang HY, Kim JS, Kim KB. Angiographic equivalency of off-pump saphenous vein and arterial composite grafts at one year. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 90:516-521. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.017, 20667342.
27. Lobo Filho JG, Lobo Filho HG, Mesquita FJ, Linhares Filho JP. Left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein as a composite graft: 8-year angiographic follow-up study. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovas 2010, 25:118-121.
28. Yuan SM, Shinfeld A, Tager S, Kassif Y, Raanani E. Modifications of composite grafts for coronary bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol 2007, 121:196-197. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.08.066, 17109979.
29. Bernet FH, Hirschmann MT, Reineke D, Grapow M, Zerkowski HR. Clinical outcome after composite grafting of calcified left anterior descending arteries. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2006, 47:569-574.
30. Fukushima S, Kobayashi J, Niwaya K, Tagusari O, Bando K, Nakajima H. Accelerated graft disease in a composite saphenous vein with internal thoracic artery in a chronic renal dialysis patient. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 52:372-374. 10.1007/s11748-004-0013-3, 15384711.
31. Gaudino M, Alessandrini F, Pragliola C, Luciani N, Trani C, Burzotta F, Girola F, Nasso G, Guarini G, Possati G. Composite Y internal thoracic artery-saphenous vein grafts: short-term angiographic results and vasoreactive profile. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 127:1139-1144. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.07.051, 15052214.
32. Bittner HB, Savitt MA, Ching PV, Ward HB. Off-pump coronary artery revascularization: ideal indication for patients with porcelain aorta and calcification of great vessels. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2003, 44:217-221.
33. Lilly LS. Pathophysiology of Heart disease: A Collaborative Project of Medical Students and Faculty 2011, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 5.
34. Blackwelder WC. " Proving the null hypothesis" in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1982, 3:345-353. 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1, 7160191.
35. Power (sample size) calculators Binary outcome non-inferiority trial by Sealed Envelope Ltd [http://www.sealedenvelope.com/power_binary_noninferior.php], Power (sample size) calculators.
36. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006, 295:1152-1160. 10.1001/jama.295.10.1152, 16522836.
37. Freidlin B, Korn EL, George SL, Gray R. Randomized clinical trial design for assessing noninferiority when superiority is expected. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:5019-5023. 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8711, 17971602.
38. D'Agostino RB, Massaro JM, Sullivan LM. Non-inferiority trials: design concepts and issues - the encounters of academic consultants in statistics. Stat Med 2003, 22:169-186.