Comprehensive noninvasive evaluation of bypass grafts and native coronary arteries in patients after coronary bypass surgery: Accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography compared to invasive coronary angiography

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 81-90

  Lee, Raymond ^a   Lim, Jimmy ^a   Kaw, Gregory ^a   Wan, Gervais ^a   Ng, Kenneth ^a   Ho, Kheng Thye ^a  

^a TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

64 slice multidetector computed tomography; Bypass graft occlusion; Bypass graft stenosis; Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; Distal runoff vessels; Invasive coronary angiography; Ungrafted native coronary arteries

Indexed keywords

ATENOLOL; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; METOPROLOL;

AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX PAIN;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 75149195878     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832f3e2e     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, et al. Long term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:2174-2183.
2. Myers WO, Blackstone EH, Davis K, Foster ED, Kaiser GC. CASS Registry long-term surgical survival. Coronary Artery Surgery study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33:488-498.
3. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yusel EK. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2004; 232:18-37.
4. de Feyter PJ, Nieman K. Noninvasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography: an emerging clinical modality. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 15:1238-1240. (Pubitemid 39208878)
5. Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, Baum U, Giesler T, Derlien H, et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88:792-795.
6. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Elisio A, Tomassini M, Razzini C, Sperandio M, et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004; 110:3234-3238.
7. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P, Kuhl H, Schmermund A, Barkhausen J. Non invasive visualisation of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44:1224-1229.
8. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, Romagnoli R, Modena MG. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:1094-1097.
9. Nieman K, Pattynama PM, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, de Feyter PJ. Evaluation of patients after coronary artery bypass surgery: CT angiographic assessment of grafts and coronary arteries. Radiology 2003; 229:749-756.
10. Burgsthaler C, Beck T, Kuettner A, Drosch T, Kopp AF, Heuschmid M, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of coronary bypass grafts using 16-row multislice computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. Int J Cardiol 2006; 106:244-249.
11. Pache G, Sauressig U, Frydrychowicz A, Foell D, Ghanem N, Kotter E, et al. Initial experience with 64-slice Cardiac CT: noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:976-980.
12. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pflederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass graft surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 2006; 114:2334-2341.
13. Meyer T, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Will A, Kastrati A, Schomig A, Hausleiter J. Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:946-950.
14. Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L, Eisenberg S, Allen R, Bradford S, Frohwein S. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:1529-1534.
15. Malagutti P, Nieman K, Meijboom WB, van Miegham CA, Pugliese F, Cademartiri F, et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2007; 28:1879-1885.
16. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council of Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51 (suppl):5-40.
17. Gersh BJ, Braunwald E, Rutherford JD. Chronic coronary artery disease. In: Braunwald E, editor. Heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996. pp. 1320-1321.
18. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder T, Marincek B, Wildermuth S. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482-1487.
19. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neil WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of non invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557.
20. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, Kuttner A, Baum U, Bautz W, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64-X 0.6mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97:343-348.
21. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F, Burgstahler C, Cademartiri F, de Feyter P, et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the WorkingGroup Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:531-556.
22. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Carr JC, Gerstad NA, et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48:1475-1497.
23. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland P, et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006; 114:1761-1791.