Non-Invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts and Native Coronary Arteries Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison With Invasive Coronary Angiography;Valoración no invasiva de injertos aortocoronarios y coronarias nativas con tomografía computarizada de 64 detectores: comparación con la coronariografía invasiva

Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 161-169

  Laynez Carnicero, Ana ^a   Estornell Erill, Jordi ^a   Trigo Bautista, Alberto ^a   Valle Muñoz, Alfonso ^a   Nadal Barangé, Mercedes ^a   Romaguera Torres, Rafael ^a   del Viejo, Ana Planas ^b   Corbí Pascual, Miguel ^a   Payá Serrano, Rafael ^a,c   Ridocci Soriano, Francisco ^a,c  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL GENERAL DE CASTELLÓN   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery bypass graft; Coronary artery disease

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 76749105568     PISSN: 03008932     EISSN: 15792242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-8932(10)70034-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brian A.J., and Angelini G.D. The biology of saphenous vein graft occlusion: etiology and strategies for prevetion. Curr Opin Cardiol 9 (1994) 642-649
2. Barner H.B., Standeven J.W., and Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90 (1985) 668-675
3. Cameron A.A., Davis K.B., and Rogers W.J. Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery; predictors and prognosis (CASS Registry). Coronary Artery Surgery Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 26 (1995) 895-899
4. Alderman E.L., Kip K.E., Whitlow P.L., Bashore T., Fortin D., Bourassa M.G., et al. Native coronary disease progression exceeds failed revascularization as cause of angina after five years in the Bypass Angioplasty. Revascularization Investigation (BARI). J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 766-774
5. Bunce N.H., Lorenz C.H., John A.S., Lesser J.R., Mohiaddin R.H., and Pennell D.J. Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imagin with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 227 (2003) 440-446
6. Langerak S.E., Vliegen H.W., De Roos A., Zwinderman A.H., Jukema J.W., Kunz P., et al. Detection of vein graft disease using high resolution magnetic resonance angiography. Circulation 105 (2002) 328-333
7. Moncada R., Salinas M., Churchill R., Love L., Reynes C., Demos T.C., et al. Patency of saphenous aortocoronary-bypass grafts demonstrated by computed tomography. N Engl J Med 303 (1980) 503-505
8. Achenbach S., Moshage W., Ropers D., Nossen J., and Bachmann K. Non-invasive, three dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 79 (1997) 856-861
9. Ropers D., Ulzheimer S., Wenkel E., Baum U., Giesler T., Derlien H., et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88 (2001) 792-795
10. Malagutti P., Nieman K., Meijboom W.B., Van Mieghem C.A., Pugliese F., Cademartiri F., et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 28 (2007) 1879-1885
11. Onuma Y., Tanabe K., Chihara R., Yamamoto H., Miura Y., Kigawa I., et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. Am Heart J 154 (2007) 519-526
12. Stauder N.I., Küttner A., Schröder S., Drosch T., Beck T., Stauder H., et al. Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment of graft patency and native coronary artery lesions using 16-slice MDCT. Eur Radiol 27 (2006) 967-980
13. Ropers D., Pohle F.K., Kuettner A., Pflederer T., Anders K., Daniel W.G., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 220-ms gantry rotation. Circulation 114 (2006) 2334-2341
14. Dickers R., Willems T.P., Tio R.A., Anthonio R.L., Zijlstra F., and Oudkerk M. The benefit of 64-MDCT prior to invasive coronary angiography in symptomatic post-CABG patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23 (2007) 369-377
15. Nazeri I., Shahabi P., Tehrai M., Sharif-Kashani B., and Nazeri A. Assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting using 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 103 (2009) 667-673
16. Trigo Bautista A., Estornell J., Ridocci F., Soriano C.J., Gudín M., Vilar J.V., et al. Valoración no invasiva de injertos coronarios con tomografía computarizada: comparación con la angiografía convencional. Rev Esp Cardiol 58 (2005) 807-814
17. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., Gensini G.G., Gott V.L., Griffith L.S., et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51 (1975) 5-40
18. Schlosser T., Konorza T., Hunold P., Kühl H., Schmermund A., and Barkhausen J. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector-row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 1224-1229
19. Martuscelli E., Romagnoli A., D'Eliseo A., Tomassini M., Razzini C., Sperandio M., et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 110 (2004) 3234-3238
20. Pache G., Saueressig U., Frydrychowicz A., Foell D., Ghanem N., Kotter E., et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 976-980
21. Meyer T.S., Martinoff S., Hadamitzky M., Will A., Kastrati A., Schömig A., et al. Improved non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient population. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 946-950
22. Feuchtner G., Schachner T., Bonatti J., Friedrich G., Soegner P., Klauser A., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189 (2007) 574-580
23. Jabara R., Chronos N., Klein L., Eisenberg S., Allen R., Bradford S., et al. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 1529-1534
24. Einstein A.J., Henzlova M.J., and Rajagopalan S. Stimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298 (2007) 317-323