Off-Pump vs Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Early and 1-Year Graft Patency, Cost, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes: A Randomized Trial

JAMA

Volumn 291, Issue 15, 2004, Pages 1841-1849

  Puskas, John D ^a,f   Williams, Willis H ^b,d   Mahoney, Elizabeth M ^e   Huber, Philip R ^b   Block, Peter C ^b   Duke, Peggy G ^c   Staples, James R ^c   Glas, Katherine E ^c   Marshall, J Jeffrey ^b   Leimbach, Mark E ^b   McCall, Susan A ^a   Petersen, Rebecca J ^a   Bailey, Dianne E ^a   Weintraub, William S ^d   Guyton, Robert A ^a  

^a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery   (United States)

^b Division of Cardiology   (United States)

^c Division of Cardiac Anesthesiology   (United States)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^f EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMORBIDITY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART INFARCTION; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE PROLAPSE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STROKE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 11144354823     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.15.1841     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Roach GW, Kenchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1857-1863.
2. Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute, et al. Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:395-402.
3. Edmunds LH. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:S12-S16.
4. National Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Adult Cardiac Database: Fall 2002 Report (data reported through June 2002). Available at: http://www.sts.org. Accessibility verified March 26, 2004.
5. Boncheck LI, Ullyot DJ. Minimally invasive coronary bypass: a dissenting opinion. Circulation. 1998;98:495-497.
6. Cooley DA. Con: beating-heart surgery for coronary revascularization: is it the most important development since the introduction of the heart-lung machine? Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1779-1781.
7. MacGillivray TA, Vlahakes GJ. Perspective: angioplasty versus minimally invasive bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:551-552.
8. Mack MJ, Osborn JA, Shennib H. Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1055-1059.
9. Khan NE, DeSouza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:21-28.
10. Czerny M, Baumer H, Kilo J, et al. Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:165-169.
11. Van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EWL, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation. 2001;104:1761-1766.
12. Cartier R, Brann S, Dagennairs F, Martineau R, Couturier A. Systemic off-pump coronary artery revascularization in multivessel disease: an experience with 300 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:221-229.
13. Cleveland JC, Shroyer ALW, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1282-1289.
14. Plomondon ME, Cleveland JC, Ludwig ST, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass is associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:114-119.
15. Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Marshall JJ, et al. Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1477-1484.
16. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Lancet. 2002;359:1194-1199.
17. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Lotto AA, Pitsis AA, Angelini GD. Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2237-2242.
18. Nathoe HM, Van Dijk D, Jansen EWL, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:394-402.
19. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797-808.
20. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Postrandomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325:652-654.
21. Puskas JD, Vinten-Johansen J, Muraki S, Guyton RA. Myocardial protection for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13:82-88.
22. FitzGibbon GM, Leach AF, Keon WJ, et al. Coronary bypass graft fate: angiographic study of 1,179 vein grafts early, 1 year, and five years after operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;91:773-778.
23. Ganz W. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial [letter]. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1018.
24. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35:1095-1108.
25. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health status survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
26. Becker ER, Mauldin PD, Bernadino ME. Using physician work RVUs to profile surgical packages: methods and results for kidney transplant surgery. Best Pract Benchmark Healthcare. 1996;1:1-7.
27. Mitchell JB, Burge RT, Lee AF et al. Per Case Prospective Payment for Episodes of Hospital Care. Springfield, Va: US Dept of Commerce National Technical Information Service; 1995. Publication PB95226023.
28. Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13-22.
29. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the Bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
30. Social Security Death Index. Available at: http://www.allvitalrecords.com. Accessed July 22, 2003.
31. Jones EL, Weintraub WS. The importance of completeness of revascularization during long-term follow-up after coronary artery operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:227-237.
32. Song HK, Petersen RJ, Sharoni E, Guyton RA, Puskas JD. Safe evolution towards routine multivessel off-pump coronary artery bypass: negotiating the learning curve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:947-952.
33. Mariani AM, Gu J, Boonstra PW, et al. Procoagulant activity after off-pump coronary operation: is the current anticoagulation adequate? Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1370-1375.
34. Quigley RL, Fried DW, Pym J, Highbloom RY. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery may produce a hypercoagulable patient. Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6:94-98.
35. Kim K-B, Lim C, Lee C, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass may decrease the patency of saphenous vein grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:S1033-1037.
36. Omeroglu SN, Kirali K, Guler M, et al. Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:844-850.
37. Kurlansky PA. Is there a hypercoagulable state after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? what do we know and what can we do? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:7-10.
38. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, et al. Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2002;325:1268-1271.
39. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1162-1166.
40. Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT, et al. Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:18-26.
41. Van Dijk D, Janesn EWL, Hijman R, et al. Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2002;287:1405-1412.
42. Immer FF, Berdat PA, Immer-Bansi AS, et al. Benefit to quality of life after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:27-31.
43. Murkin JM, Newman SP, Stump DA, Blumenthal JA. Statement of consensus on assessment of neurobehavioral outcomes after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1289-1295.
44. Stump DA, James RL, Murkin JM. Is that outcome different or not? the effect of experimental design and statistics on neurobehavioral outcome studies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1782-1785.