Posterior spinal fusion using pedicle screws

Orthopedics

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Athanasakopoulos, Michael ^a   Mavrogenis, Andreas F ^a   Triantafyllopoulos, George ^a   Koufos, Spiros ^a   Pneumaticos, Spiros G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; POLYETHERETHERKETONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GIANT CELL TUMOR; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LEG PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTERIOR VERTEBRAL FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; SPINE FRACTURE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL INFECTION; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WOUND DRESSING;

ADULT; AGED; BONE SCREWS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84883001333     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-28     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ponnappan RV, Sherhan H, Zerda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fxa-tion. Spine J. 2009; 9(3):263-267.
2. Asher MA, Carson WL, Hardacker JW, Lark RG, Lai SM. The effect of arthrodesis, implant stiffness, and time on the canine lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007; 20(8):549-559.
3. Dobbs MB, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Luhmann SJ, Bridwell KH. Anterior/posterior spinal instrumentation versus posterior instrumentation alone for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliotic curves more than 90 degrees. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(20):2386-2391.
4. Kowalski RJ, Ferrara LA, Benzel EC. Bio-mechanics of bone fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2001; 10(4):E2.
5. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(32):4845-4869.
6. Wedemeyer M, Parent S, Mahar A, Odell T, Swimmer T, Newton P. Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(1):42-48.
7. Cavagna R, Tournier C, Aunoble S, et al. Lumbar decompression and fusion in elderly osteoporotic patients: prospective study using less rigid titanium rod fxation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21(2):86-91.
8. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, Mc-Gillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(17):1938-1944.
9. Sears W, Sergides I, Kazemi N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar ar-throdesis. Spine J. 2011; 11(1):11-20.
10. Hikata T, Kamata M, Furukawa M. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and effcacy of simultaneous decompression surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disease [published online ahead of print March 28, 2012]. J Spinal Disord Tech.
11. Lund T, Oxland TR. Adjacent level disk disease-is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am. 2011; 42(4):529-541.
12. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, et al. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of lami-nectomy and extension of instrumented fusion for adjacent-segment disease: defning the value of surgical intervention. J Neuro-surg Spine. 2012; 16(2):141-146.
13. Anandjiwala J, Seo JY, Ha KY, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum fve-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(11):1951-1960.
14. Ormond DR, Albert L Jr, Das K. Poly-etheretherketone (PEEK) rods in lumbar spine degenerative disease: a case series [published online ahead of print October 16, 2012]. J Spinal Disord Tech.
15. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, et al. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fxa-tion system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(3):324-331.
16. Highsmith JM, Tumialan LM, Rodts GE. Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 22(1):E11.
17. Mandigo CE, Sampath P, Kaiser MG. Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: pedicle based stabilization with the AccuFlex rod system. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 22(1):E9.
18. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fxation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J. 2002; 11(suppl 2):S164-S169.
19. Welch WC, Cheng BC, Awad TE, et al. Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 22(1):E8.
20. Sapkas GS, Themistocleous GS, Mavrogenis AF, Benetos IS, Metaxas N, Papagelopoulos PJ. Stabilization of the lumbar spine using the dynamic neutralization system. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(10):859-865.
21. Sapkas G, Mavrogenis AF, Starantzis KA, Soultanis K, Kokkalis ZT, Papagelopoulos PJ. Outcome of a dynamic neutralization system for the spine. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(10):e1497-e1502.
22. Goel VK, Panjabi MM, Patwardhan AG, et al. Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(suppl 2):103-109.
23. Sagamonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone substrates compared to commercially pure titanium [published online January 15 2008]. Biomaterials. 2008; 29(11):1563-1572.
24. Moon S-M, Ingalhalikar A, Highsmith JM, Vac-caro AR. Biomechanical rigidity of an all-poly-etheretherketone anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct: an in vitro corpectomy model. Spine J. 2009; 9(4):330-335.
25. Ahn YH, Chen WM, Lee K Y, Park KW, Lee SJ. Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices. Biomed Mater. 2008; 3(4):044101.
26. Gornet MF, Chan FW, Coleman JC, et al. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fxation of lumbar fusion constructs. J Biomech Eng. 2011; 133(8):081009.
27. De Iure F, Bosco G, Cappuccio M, Paderni S, Amendola L. Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: preliminary report on 30 cases. Eur Spine J. 2012; 21(suppl 1):S50-S54.
28. Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79(2):231-252.
29. Boscainos PJ, Sapkas G, Stilianessi E, Prous-kas K, Papadakis SA. Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaires. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (411):40-53.
30. Berquist TH. Imaging of the postoperative spine. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006; 44(3):407-418.
31. Cammisa FP, Lowery G, Garfn SR, et al. Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolat-eral spine fusion a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(6):660-667.
32. Rutherford EE, Tarplett LJ, Davies EM, Harley JM, King LJ. Lumbar spine fusion and stabilization: hardware, techniques, and imaging appearances. Radiographics. 2007; 27(6):1737-1749.
33. Hilibrand AS, Dina TS. The use of diagnostic imaging to assess spinal arthrodesis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29(4):591-601.
34. Henk CB, Brodner W, Grampp S, et al. The postoperative spine. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 10(4):247-264.
35. Andrews CL. Evaluation of the postoperative spine: spinal instrumentation and fusion. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2000; 4(3):259-279.
36. Schuler TC, Subach BR, Branch CL, Foley KT, Burkus JK, Lumbar Spine Study Group. Segmental lumbar lordosis: manual versus computer-assisted measurement using seven different techniques. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004; 17(5):372-379.
37. Sandhu HS, Toth JM, Diwan AD, et al. His-tologic evaluation of the effcacy of rhBMP-2 compared with autograft bone in sheep spinal anterior interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 27(6):567-575.
38. Williams AL, Gornet MF, Burkus JK. CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26(8):2057-2066.
39. Blumenthal SL, Gill K. Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in post-operative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(9):1186-1189.
40. Bono CM, Khandha A, Vadapalli S, Holekamp S, Goel VK, Garfn SR. Residual sagittal motion after lumbar fusion: a fnite element analysis with implications on radiographic fexion-extension criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(4):417-422.
41. Burkus JK, Dorchak JD, Sanders DL. Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(4):2372-2377.
42. Cook SD, Patron LP, Christakis PM, Bailey KJ, Banta C, Glazer PA. Comparison of methods for determining the presence and extent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(10):1118-1123.
43. Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, Brooker AF, Weiss P, Siegelman SS. Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology. 1986; 160(3):675-681.
44. McMaster MJ, Merrick MV. The scintigraph-ic assessment of the scoliotic spine after fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980; 62(1):65-72.
45. Nockels RP. Early clinical experience with semi-rigid (PEEK) posterior instrumentation in lumbar fusion. Paper presented at: American Association of Neurological Surgeons annual meeting; April 16, 2007; Washington, DC.
46. Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007; 22(3):257-265.
47. Turner JL, Paller DJ, Murrell CB. The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and polyetheretherketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(21):E1076-E1082.
48. Bruner HJ, Guan Y, Yoganandan N, et al. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13(6):766-772.
49. Sarbello JF, Lipman AJ, Hong J, et al. Patient perception of outcomes following failed spinal instrumentation with polyetheretherk-etone rods and titanium rods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(17):E843-E848.
50. Vaccaro AR, Stubbs HA, Block JE. Demin-erilized bone matrix composite grafting for posterolateral spinal fusion. Orthopedics. 2007; 30(7):567-570.
51. Wang JC, Mummaneni PV, Haid RW. Current treatment strategies for the painful lumbar motion segment, posterolateral fusion versus interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(16 suppl):S33-S43.
52. Carragee EJ, Cheng I. Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2010; 10(4):313-320.