Experimental and clinical evaluation of a self-etching and an etch-and-rinse adhesive system

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 275-286

  Häfer, Matthias ^a   Schneider, Hartmut ^a   Rupf, Stefan ^b   Busch, Ingeborg ^a   Fuchß, Andreas ^a   Merte, Ilka ^c   Jentsch, Holger ^a   Haak, Rainer ^a   Merte, Knut ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Private Dental Practice ^*  (Germany)

^d Private Practice   (Germany)

Author keywords

Composite; Dental adhesive; In vitro test; In vivo test; Tooth composite interface

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLUMA COMFORT BOND; IBOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VENUS (COMPOSITE RESIN);

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882972308     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a29633     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: composite resins for posterior restorations. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2001:1-12.
2. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines: dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2001:1-9.
3. Ando S, Watanabe T, Tsubota K, Yoshida T, Irokawa A, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M. Effect of adhesive application methods on bond strength to bovine enamel. J Oral Sci 2008; 50: 181-186.
4. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Kimmes NS, Latta MA, Wilwerding TM. Effect of enamel etching time on roughness and bond strength. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 217-222.
5. Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Invest 2005; 9: 209-214.
6. Bekes K, Boeckler L, Gernhardt CR, Schaller HG. Clinical performance of a self-etching and a total-etch adhesive system - 2-year results. J Oral Rehab 2007; 34: 855-861.
7. Bittencourt DD, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months’ evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2005; 63: 173-178.
8. Blunck, U, Zaslansky, P. Enamel margin integrity of class I one-bottle all-in-one adhesive-based restorations. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13: 23-29.
9. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 90-101.
10. Cvar J, Ryge G. Criteria for clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. U.S. Government Printing Office, San Francisco 1971;USPHS publ. no. 790-240
11. De Munck J, Van Landhuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 118-132.
12. De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005; 30:39-49.
13. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent 2007;9:107-116.
14. Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Tay FR. Characterization of resin-dentin interfaces by compressive cyclic loading. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2043-2052.
15. Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multibottle" dentin adhesives - a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 373-380.
16. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: Effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 397-412.
17. Grégoire G, Ahmed Y. Evaluation of enamel etching capacity of six contemporary self-etching adhesives. J Dent 2007; 35: 388-397.
18. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 464-470.
19. Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Svizero NR, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Sano H, Kaga M, Pashley DH. The effects of common errors on sealing ability of total-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 560-568.
20. Heintze SD, Blunck U, Göhring TN, Rousson V. Marginal adaption in vitro and clinical outcome of class V restorations. Dent Mater 2009; 25:605-620.
21. Heintze SD, Thunpithayakul C, Armstrong, SR, Rousson V. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 114-125.
22. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 121-147.
23. Loguercio AD, Bittencourt DD, Baratieri LN, Reis A. A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 507-514.
24. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.
25. Merte K, Fröhlich M, Häfer M, Hirsch E, Schneider H, Winkler M. Twoyear clinical performance of two primer adhesives on class V restorations. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 93-99.
26. Merte I, Schneider H, Merte K. Ist es notwendig, eingeführte Füllungsmaterialien klinisch-experimentell zu bewerten? (Is there a need to assess experimentally and clinically restorative materials launched into the market?) Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2004;114:1124-1131.
27. Moura SK, Pelizzaro A, Dal Bianco K, De Goes MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Grande RH. Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? J Adhes Dent 2006;8:75-83.
28. Nunes TG, Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M. Spatially resolved photopolymerization kinetics and oxygen inhibition in dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1809-1817.
29. Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Anauate-Netto C, Castilhos N, Carmo AR, Lewgoy HR, Amore R, Cordeiro HJ. Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 149-159.
30. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 7-10.
31. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives:a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 864-881.
32. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Lambrechts P. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions (abstract). J Dent Res 2003;82(Spec Iss B):911.
33. Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC, Geraldeli S, Loguercio AD. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc 2009; 140: 877-885.
34. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift EJ Jr., Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 370-378.
35. Sarrett DC. Prediction of clinical outcomes of a restoration based on in vivo marginal quality evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9: 117-120.
36. Schneider H, Busch I, Busch M, Jentsch H, Häfer M. Effect of operatorspecific handling on tooth-composite interface and microleakage formation. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 200-210.
37. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lai SC, Yiu CK, Cheong C. Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 537-541.
38. Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 2006; 34: 77-85.
39. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3757-3785.
40. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landhuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 375-383.
41. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves, A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater 2010;26:e100-e121.
42. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck, J, van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.
43. Yiu CK, King NM, Carrilho MR, Sauro S, Rueggeberg FA, Prati C, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and temperature on water sorption of dental adhesive resins. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 1695-1703.
44. Yiu CK, Pashley EL, Hiraishi N, King NM, Goracci C, Ferrari M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Solvent and water retention in dental adhesive blends after evaporation. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6863-6872.