When emulation becomes reciprocity

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 662-669

  Sartori, Luisa ^a   Bucchioni, Giulia ^a   Castiello, Umberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Action observation; Action prediction; Complementary actions; Motor evoked potentials; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ACTION OBSERVATION; ACTION PREDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOMECHANICS; COMPLEMENTARY ACTIONS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; IMITATION; MALE; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTION OBSERVATION; ACTION PREDICTION; COMPLEMENTARY ACTIONS; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882959683     PISSN: 17495016     EISSN: 17495024     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss044     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abernethy, B., Zawi, K. (2007). Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 39(5), 353-67.
2. Abernethy, B., Zawi, K., Jackson, R.C. (2008). Expertise and attunement to kinematic constraints. Perception, 37(6), 931-48.
3. Aglioti, S.M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1109-16.
4. Aglioti, S.M., Pazzaglia, M. (2011). Sounds and scents in (social) action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(2), 47-55.
5. Avenanti, A., Bolognini, N., Malavita, A., Aglioti, S.M. (2007). Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Current Biology, 17, 2129-35.
6. Avenanti, A., Urgesi, C. (2011). Understanding 'what' others do: mirror mechanisms play a crucial role in action perception. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(3), 257-9.
7. Blakemore, S.J., Frith, C. (2005). The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43(2), 260-7, Review.
8. Borroni, P., Montagna, M., Cerri, G., Baldissera, F. (2005). Cyclic time course of motor excitability modulation during observation of hand actions in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 190-4.
9. Brasil-Neto, J.P., Cohen, L.G., Panizza, M., Nilsson, J., Roth, B.J., Hallett, M. (1992). Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiolology, 9, 132-6.
10. Briggs, G.G., Nebes, R.D. (1975). Patterns of hand preference in a student population. Cortex, 11, 230-8.
11. Brooks, A., Schouten, B., Troje, N.F., Verfaillie, K., Blanke, O., van der Zwan, R. (2008). Correlated changes in perceptions of the gender and orientation of ambiguous biological motion figures. Current Biology, 18(17), R728-9.
12. Candidi, M., Leone-Fernandez, B., Barber, H.A., Carreiras, M., Aglioti, S.M. (2010). Hands on the future: facilitation of cortico-spinal hand-representation when reading the future tense of hand-related action verbs. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32(4), 677-83.
13. Castiello, U., Bennet, K.M.B., Stelmach, G.E. (1993). Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 163-78.
14. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., Umiltà , C. (1998). Visuomotor Priming. Visual Cognition, 5, 109-125.
15. Di Lazzaro, V., Oliviero, A., Profice, P., et al. (1998). Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 109, 397-401.
16. Dittrich, W.H. (1993). Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception, 22(1), 15-22.
17. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Olivier, E. (2005). Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others' action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 213-8.
18. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G., Rizzolatti, G. (1995). Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 2608-11.
19. Gangitano, M., Mottaghy, F.M., Pascual-Leone, A. (2001). Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation. Neuroreport, 12, 1489-92.
20. Gazzola, V., Keysers, C. (2009). The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1239-55.
21. Grèzes, J., Frith, C.D., Passingham, R.E. (2004). Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21(2), 744-50.
22. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The hand and the object: the role of posterior parietal cortex in forming motor representations. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 72, 535-41.
23. Kilner, J.M., Vargas, C., Duval, S., Blakemore, S.J., Sirigu, A. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nature Neuroscience, 7(12), 1299-301.
24. Knoblich, G., Flach, R. (2001). Predicting the effects of actions: interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science, 12(6), 467-72.
25. Kozlowski, L.T., Cutting, J.E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575-80.
26. Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210-20.
27. Montepare, J.M., Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1988). Impressions of people created by agerelated qualities of their gaits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 547-56.
28. Newman-Nordlund, R.D., van Schie, H.T., van Zuijlen, A.M., Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more activated during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 817-8.
29. Ocampo, B., Kritikos, A. (2010). Placing actions in context: motor facilitation following observation of identical and non-identical manual acts. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 743-51.
30. Pollick, F.E., Lestou, V., Ryu, J., Cho, S.B. (2002). Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion. Vision Research, 42(20), 2345-55.
31. Pollick, F.E., Paterson, H.M., Bruderlin, A., Sanford, A.J. (2001). Perceiving affect from arm movement. Cognition, 82(2), B51-61.
32. Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P.M., Pascual-Leone, A. (2009). Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 2008-39.
33. Runeson, S., Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112(4), 585-615.
34. Sartori, L., Becchio, C., Castiello, U. (2011a). Cues to intention: the role of movement information. Cognition, 119(2), 242-52.
35. Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., Castiello, U. (2011b). Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by the social dimension of observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3-4), 557-68.
36. Sartori, L., Cavallo, A., Bucchioni, G., Castiello, U. (2012). From simulation to reciprocity: the case of complementary actions. Social Neuroscience, 7, 146-158.
37. Schippers, M.B., Keysers, C. (2011). Mapping the flow of information within the putative mirror neuron system during gesture observation. Neuroimage, 57(1), 37-44.
38. Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W. (2007). Prospective coding in event representation. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 93-102.
39. Sebanz, N., Shiffrar, M. (2009). Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(1), 170-5.
40. Tucker, M., Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-46.
41. Troje, N.F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2(5), 371-87.
42. Urgesi, C., Maieron, M., Avenanti, A., Tidoni, E., Fabbro, F., Aglioti, S.M. (2010). Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex, 20(11), 2511-21.
43. Urgesi, C., Moro, V., Candidi, M., Aglioti, S.M. (2006). Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 7942-9.
44. van Schie, H.T., van Waterschoot, B.M., Bekkering, H. (2008). Understanding action beyond imitation: reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1493-1500.
45. Vanrie, J., Verfaillie, K. (2004). Perception of biological motion: a stimulus set of human point-light actions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 625-9.
46. Wassermann, E.M. (1998). Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108, 1-16.
47. Wilson, M., Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460-73.
48. Wolpert, D.M., Flanagan, J.R. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11(18), R729-32.