Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 180-187

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Academic literacy; Feedback; Higher education; Student perceptions; Teacher evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882892501     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:102-118.
2. Bloxham S., Boyd P. Developing effective assessment in higher education 2007, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
3. Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 2006, 32(2):219-233.
4. Christie F., Derewianka B. School discourse 2008, Continuum, London.
5. Davison C. Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly 2007, 4(1):37-68.
6. Ferris D. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction 2006, 81-104. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
7. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life 1971, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.
8. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77(1):81-112.
9. Higgins R., Hartley P., Skelton A. Getting the message across: The problem of communicating assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education 2001, 6(2):269-274.
10. Hirvela A. Writing to learn in content areas. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, Benjamins, Amsterdam. R. Manchón (Ed.).
11. Hu G.W. Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly 2005, 394:635-660.
12. Hyland F. Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies 2010, 10(2):171-182.
13. Hyland F., Hyland K. Sugaring the pill; Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10(3):185-212.
14. Hyland K., Hyland F. Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York. K. Hyland, F. Hyland (Eds.).
15. Krause K.L., Hartley R., James R., McInnis C. The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of national studies 2005, Accessed 04.06.12. http://www.griffith.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0006/37491/FYEReport05.pdf.
16. Langer J., Applebee A. How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22 1987, Accessed 04.06.12. http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED286205.pdf.
17. Lea M., Street B.V. Student writing and staff feedback in higher education. Student writing in higher education: New contexts 2000, 32-46. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham. M. Lea, B. Stierer (Eds.).
18. Lee I. Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:69-85.
19. Orsmond, Merry Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors' and students' understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2011, 36(2):125-136.
20. Pokorny H., Pickford P. Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education 2010, 11(1):21-30.
21. Price M., Handley K., Millar J., O'Donovan B. Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment and Evaluation in higher Education 2010, 35(3):277-289.
22. Schulz R.A. Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA - Columbia. The Modern Language Journal 2001, 85(2):244-258.
23. Scott J., Badge J., Cann A. Perceptions of feedback one year on: A comparative study of the views of first and second year biological sciences students. Bioscience Education 2009, 13. http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol13/beej-13-2.pdf.
24. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 1996, 46(2):327-369.
25. Truscott J., Hsu A.Y.P. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:292-305.
26. Vygotsky L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Walker M. An investigation into written comments on assignments: Do students find them usable?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2009, 34(1):47-78.
28. Watty K., Carr R., De Lange P., O'Connell B., Howieson B. Student perceptions of feedback in Australian University accounting education. Proceedings of 2011 AFAANZ conference 2011, 1-33. B. Potter, P. De Lange (Eds.).
29. Weaver M. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors' written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2006, 31(3):379-394.
30. Yorke M. Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education 2003, 45(4):471-501.