Applying a multiobjective metaheuristic inspired by honey bees to phylogenetic inference

BioSystems

Volumn 114, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 39-55

  Santander Jiménez, Sergio ^a   Vega Rodríguez, Miguel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bioinspired computation; Computational biology; Multiobjective optimization; Phylogeny reconstruction; Swarm intelligence

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

ALGORITHM; BIOINFORMATICS; BIOLOGICAL METHOD; DATA SET; HEURISTICS; HONEYBEE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; NUCLEIC ACID; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; RECONSTRUCTION; RELATEDNESS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC DISTANCE; HONEYBEE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; ALGORITHM; CLASSIFICATION; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

APIS MELLIFERA; APOIDEA;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 84882673571     PISSN: 03032647     EISSN: 18728324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2013.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bos D.H., Posada D. Using models of nucleotide evolution to build phylogenetic trees. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2005, 29(3):211-227.
2. Bryant D., Galtier N., Poursat M.A. Likelihood calculations in molecular phylogenetics. Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny 2005, 33-62. Oxford University Press.
3. Cancino W., Delbem A.C.B. A multi-objective evolutionary approach for phylogenetic inference. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization 2007, 428-442. Springer-Verlag.
4. Cancino W., Delbem A.C.B. A multi-criterion evolutionary approach applied to phylogenetic reconstruction. New Achievements in Evolutionary Computation 2010, 135-156. InTech, Vukovar, Croatia. P. Korosec (Ed.).
5. Chase M.W., et al. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcl. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 1993, 80(3):528-580.
6. Chor B., Tuller T. Maximum likelihood of evolutionary trees is hard. Research in Computational Molecular Biology 2005, 296-310. Springer-Verlag.
7. Coelho G.P., Silva A.E.A., Zuben F.J.V. An immune-inspired multi-objective approach to the reconstruction of phylogenetic trees. Neural Comput. Appl. 2010, 19(8):1103-1132.
8. Cole J.R., Chai B., Farris R.J., Wang Q., Kulam S.A., McGarrell D.M., Garrity G.M., Tiedje J.M. The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acid Res. 2005, 33. (Database issue D294-6).
9. Congdon C.B. Gaphyl: an evolutionary algorithms approach for the study of natural evolution. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2002, 2002:1057-1064.
10. Cotta C., Moscato P. Inferring phylogenetic trees using evolutionary algorithms. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VII 2002, 720-729. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
11. Cotta C., Moscato P. A memetic-aided approach to hierarchical clustering from distance matrices: application to gene expression clustering and phylogeny. Biosystems 2003, 72(1-2):75-97.
12. Cryan J.R., Wiegmann B.M., Deitz L.L., Dietrich C.H. Phylogeny of the treehoppers (insecta: hempitera: membracidae): evidence from two nuclear genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000, 17(2):317-334.
13. Day W.H.E., Johnson D.S., Sankoff D. The computational complexity of inferring rooted phylogenies by parsimony. Math. Biosci. 1986, 81(1):33-42.
14. Deb K., Pratap A., Agarwal S., Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2002, 6(2):182-197.
15. Dutheil J., Gaillard S., Bazin E., Glémin S., Ranwez V., Galtier N., Belkhir K. Bio++: a set of C++ libraries for sequence analysis, phylogenetics, molecular evolution and population genetics. BMC Bioinform. 2006, 7:188-193.
16. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evolut. 1981, 17(6):368-376.
17. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) 2000, http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html/.
18. Felsenstein J. Inferring Phylogenies 2004, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
19. Fitch W. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 1972, 20(4):406-416.
20. Fogel G.B. Evolutionary computation for the inference of natural evolutionary histories. IEEE Connect. 2005, 3(1):11-14.
21. Gallardo J.E., Cotta C., Fernández A.J. Reconstructing phylogenies with memetic algorithms and branch-and-bound. Analysis of Biological Data: A Soft Computing Approach 2007, 59-84. World Scientific, Singapore.
22. Goëffon A., Richer J.M., Hao J.K. Progressive tree neighborhood applied to the maximum parsimony problem. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2008, 5(1):136-145.
23. Goloboff P.A. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 1999, 15(4):415-428.
24. Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S., Nixon K.C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 2008, 24(5):774-786.
25. Goloboff P.A., Farris J.S., Nixon K.C. Tree analysis using New Technology 2008, http://www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny/tnt/.
26. Handl J., Kell D.B., Knowles J.D. Multiobjective optimization in bioinformatics and computational biology. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput Biol. Bioinform. 2007, 4(2):279-292.
27. Hasegawa M., Kishino H., Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 1985, 22(2):160-174.
28. Helaers R., Milinkovitch M.C. MetaPIGA v2.0: maximum likelihood large phylogeny estimation using the metapopulation genetic algorithm and other stochastic heuristics. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11(1):379-389.
29. HIV Sequence Database, 2005. http://www.hiv.lanl.gov/.
30. Huelsenbeck J.P. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 1995, 44(1):17-48.
31. Ingman M., Gyllensten U. mtDB: Human Mitochondrial Genome Database, a resource for population genetics and medical sciences. Nucleic Acid Res. 2006, 34. (Database issue D749-D751).
32. Karaboga D., Basturk B. A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J. Global Optim. 2007, 39(3):171-459.
33. Karaboga D., Gorkemli B., Ozturk C., Karaboga N. A comprehensive survey: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2012, 10.1007/s10462-012-9328-0.
34. Katoh K., Kuma K., Miyata T. Genetic algorithm-based maximum-likelihood analysis for molecular phylogeny. J. Mol. Evolut. 2001, 53(4-5):477-484.
35. Lemmon A.R., Milinkovitch M.C. The metapopulation genetic algorithm: an efficient solution for the problem of large phylogeny estimation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99(16):10516-10521.
36. Levene H. Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to Probability and Statistics 1960, Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA.
37. Lewis P.O. A genetic algorithm for maximum-likelihood phylogeny inference using nucleotide sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 1998, 15(3):277-283.
38. Lindman H.R. Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Designs 1974, W.H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco, CA.
39. Macey J.R. Plethodontid salamander mitochondrial genomics: a parsimony evaluation of character conflict and implications for historical biogeography. Cladistics 2005, 21(2):194-202.
40. Mann H.B., Whitney D.R. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 1947, 18(1):50-60.
41. Massey F.J. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1951, 46(253):68-78.
42. Matsuda H. Construction of phylogenetic trees from amino acid sequences using a genetic algorithm. Proceedings of Genome Informatics Workshop 1995, 19-28. Universal Academy Press.
43. Moilanen A. Searching for most parsimonious trees with simulated evolutionary optimization. Cladistics 1999, 15(1):39-50.
44. Moore M.J., Jansen R.K. Molecular evidence for the age, origin, and evolutionary history of the American desert plant genus Tiquilia (boraginaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39(3):668-687.
45. Mueller R.L., Macey J.R., Jaekel M., Wake D.B., Boore J.L. Morphological homoplasy, life history evolution, and historical biogeography of plethodontid salamanders inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101(38):13820-13825.
46. Piontkivska H. Efficiencies of maximum likelihood methods of phylogenetic inferences when different substitution models are used. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 31(3):865-873.
47. Poladian L., Jermiin L. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms and phylogenetic inference with multiple data sets. Soft Comput. 2006, 10(4):359-368.
48. Poladian L., Jermiin L.S. What might evolutionary algorithms (EA) and multi-objective optimization (moo) contribute to phylogenetics and the total evidence debate. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2004 2004.
49. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25(7):1253-1256.
50. Reijmers T.H., Wehrens R., Daeyaert F.D., Lewi P.J., Buydens L.M.C. Using genetic algorithms for the construction of phylogenetic trees: application to G-protein coupled receptor sequences. Biosystems 1999, 49(1):31-43.
51. Rodriguez F., Oliver J.F., Marin A., Medina J.R. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theoret. Biol. 1990, 142(4):485-501.
52. Rokas A., Williams B.L., King N., Carroll S.B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 2003, 425(6960):798-804.
53. Santander-Jiménez S., Vega-Rodríguez M.A., Gómez-Pulido J.A., Sánchez-Pérez J.M. Comparing different operators and models to improve a multiobjective artificial bee colony algorithm for inferring phylogenies. Theory and Practice of Natural Computing 2012, 187-200. Springer-Verlag.
54. Santander-Jiménez S., Vega-Rodríguez M.A., Gómez-Pulido J.A., Sánchez-Pérez J.M. Inferring phylogenetic trees using a multiobjective artificial bee colony algorithm. Evolutionary Computation, Machine Learning and Data Mining in Computational Biology 2012, 144-155. Springer-Verlag.
55. Schmidt O., Drake H.L., Horn M.A. Hitherto unknown [Fe-Fe]-hydrogenase gene diversity in anaerobes and anoxic enrichments from a moderately acidic fen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76(6):2027-2031.
56. Skourikhine A. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction using self-adaptive genetic algorithm. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering 2000, 129-134. IEEE Computer Society.
57. Snell Q., Whiting M., Clement M., McLaughlin D. Parallel phylogenetic inference. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing 2001.
58. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(21):2688-2690.
59. Swofford D.L., Waddell P.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Foster P.G., Lewis P.O., Rogers J.S. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 2001, 50(4):525-539.
60. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial dna in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10(3):512-526.
61. Vargha A., Delaney H.D. A critique and improvement of the CL common language effect size statistics of McGraw and Wong. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 2000, 25(2):101-132.
62. Vieites D.R., Román S.N., Wake M.H., Wake D.B. A multigenic perspective on phylogenetic relationships in the largest family of salamanders, the plethodontidae. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2011, 59(3):623-635.
63. Weicker N., Szabo G., Weicker K., Widmayer P. Evolutionary multiobjective optimization for base station transmitter placement with frequency assignment. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2003, 7(2):189-203.
64. Wiens J.J., Servedio M.R. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods. Syst. Biol. 1998, 47(2):228-253.
65. Yang Z., Rannala B. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13(3):303-314.
66. Zitzler E., Deb K., Thiele L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. J. Evol. Comput. 2000, 8(2):173-195.
67. Zitzler E., Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1999, 3(4):257-271.
68. Zitzler E., Thiele L., Laumanns M., Fonseca C.M., Fonseca V.G.D. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2003, 7(2):117-132.
69. Zwickl D. Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets Under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion 2006, Univ. Texas at Austin, USA, Ph.D. Thesis.