A parametric bootstrap approach to the detection of phylogenetic signals in landmark data

Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 194-219

  Cole, Theodore M ^a   Lele, Subhash ^b   Richtsmeier, Joan T ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056395955     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203165171     Document Type: Chapter

References (80)

1. Adams, D. C. and Rosenberg, M. S. (1998) ‘Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995)', Systematic Biology, 47, 167-172.
2. Alberch, P. (1980) ‘Ontogenesis and morphological diversification’, American Zoologist, 20, 653-667.
3. Alberch, P. (1985) ‘Developmental constraints: why St. Bernards often have an extra digit and poodles never do’, American Naturalist, 126, 430-433.
4. Anapol, F. and Lee, S. (1994) ‘Morphological adaptation to diet in platyrrhine primates’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 94, 239-261.
5. Bock, W. J. and von Wahlert, G. (1965) ‘Adaptation and the form-function complex’, Evolution, 19, 269-299.
6. Bookstein, F. L. (1994) ‘Can biometrical shape be a homologous character?', in Hall, B. K. (ed.) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology, San Diego: Academic Press.
7. Bookstein, F. L. (1996) ‘Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis’, Bulletin of Mathmatical Biology, 58, 313-365.
8. Brooks, D. R. (1996) ‘Explanations of homoplasy at different levels of biological organization’, in Sanderson, M. J. and Hufford, L. (eds) Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 3-36.
9. Cain, A. J. and Harrison, G. A. (1960) ‘Phyletic weighting’, Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 135, 1-31.
10. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and Piazza, A. (1975) ‘Analysis of evolution: evolutionary rates, independence and treeness’, Theoretical Population Biology, 8, 127-165.
11. Chang, J. T. and Kim, J. (1996) ‘The measurement of homoplasy: a stochastic view’, in Sanderson, M. J. and Hufford, L. (eds) Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 189-203.
12. Chappill, J. A. (1989) ‘Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis’, Cladistics, 5, 217-234.
13. Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M. and Leutenegger, W. (1985) ‘The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates’, Evolution, 39, 1335-1351.
14. Cheverud, J. M., Wagner, G. and Dow, M. M. (1989) ‘Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns’, Systematic Zoology, 38, 201-213.
15. Coddington, J. A. (1988) ‘Cladistic tests of adaptational hypotheses’, Cladistics, 4, 3-22.
16. Cole, T. M. III (2001) WinEDMA: Windows-based software for Euclidean distance matrix analysis, Kansas City: School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City.
17. Colless, D. H. (1970) ‘The phenogram as an estimate of phylogeny’, Systematic Zoology, 19, 352-362.
18. Cranston, P. S. and Humphries, C. J. (1988) ‘Cladistics and computers: a chironomid conundrum?', Cladistics, 4, 72-92.
19. Davison, A. C. and Hinkley, D. V. (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Edwards, A. W. F. (1992) Likelihood, Expanded edition, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Efron, B., Halloran, E. and Holmes, S. (1996) ‘Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 13429-13434.
22. Efron, B. and Tibhshirani, R. S. (1991) ‘Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy’, Statistical Science, 1, 54-77.
23. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. S. (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap, New York: Chapman& Hall.
24. Falconer, D. S. and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th edn, Harlow, England: Longman.
25. Felsenstein, J. (1982) ‘Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 57, 379-404.
26. Felsenstein, J. (1985) ‘Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap’, Evolution, 39, 783-791.
27. Felsenstein, J. (1988) ‘Phylogenies and quantitative characters’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 445-471.
28. Fink, W. L. (1982) ‘The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny’, Paleobiology, 8, 254-264.
29. Fink, W. L. and Zelditch, M. L. (1995) ‘Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: a reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei)', Systematic Biology, 44, 343-360.
30. Goodall, C. R. (1991) ‘Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 53, 285-339.
31. Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R. (1979) ‘The spandrels of San Marcos and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 205, 581-598.
32. Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Hillis, D. M. and Bull J. J. (1993) ‘An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis’, Systematic Biology, 42, 182-192.
34. Houle, D. (1992) ‘Comparing evolvability and variability in quantitative traits’, Genetics, 130, 195-204.
35. Hubert, L. J. (1978) ‘Generalized proximity function comparison’, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 179-192.
36. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Hillis, D. M. and Jones, R. (1996) ‘Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance’, in Ferraris, J. D. and Palumbi, S. R. (eds) Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols, New York: Wiley-Liss, pp. 19-45.
37. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Rannala, B. and Masly, J. P. (2000) ‘Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies’, Science, 288, 2349-2350.
38. Johnson, R. A. and Wichern, D. W. (1982) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
39. Lande, R. and Arnold, S. J. (1983) ‘The measurement of selection on correlated characters’, Evolution, 37, 1210-1226.
40. Lanyon, S. (1985) ‘Detecting internal inconsistencies in distance data’, Systematic Zoology, 34, 397-403.
41. Lapointe, F.-J. and Legendre, P. (1990) ‘A statistical framework to test the consensus of two nested classifications’, Systematic Zoology, 39, 1-13.
42. Lapointe, F.-J. and Legendre, P. (1992) ‘Statistical significance of the matrix correlation coefficient for comparing independent phylogenetic trees’, Systematic Biology, 41, 378-384.
43. Larson, A. and Losos, J. B. (1996) ‘Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation’, in Rose, M. R. and Lauder, G. V. (eds) Adaptation, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 187-220.
44. Lauder, G. V. (1981) ‘Form and function: structural analysis in evolutionary morphology’, Paleobiology, 7, 430-442.
45. Lauder, G. V. (1990) ‘Functional morphology and systematics: studying functional patterns in an historical context’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 317-340.
46. Lele, S. (1993) ‘Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): estimation of mean form and mean form difference’, Mathematical Geology, 25, 573-602.
47. Lele, S. (1999) ‘Invariance and morphometrics: a critical appraisal of statistical techniques for landmark data’, in Chaplain, M. A. J., Singh, G. D. and MacLachlan, J. C. (eds) On growth and form: spatio-temporal pattern formation in biology, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 325-336.
48. Lele, S. and Cole, T. M. III. (1996) ‘A new test for shape differences when variance-covariance matrices are unequal’, Journal of Human Evolution, 31, 193-212.
49. Lele, S. and McCulloch, C. E. (2001) ‘Invariance and morphometrics’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, submitted manuscript.
50. Lele, S. and Richtsmeier, J. T. (1990) ‘Statistical models in morphometrics: are they realistic?', Systematic Zoology, 39, 60-69.
51. Lele, S. and Richtsmeier, J. T. (1991) ‘Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate free approach to comparing biological shapes using landmark data’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 86, 415-428.
52. Lele, S. and Richtsmeier, J. T. (2001) An invariant approach to the statistical analysis of form, London: CRC Press.
53. Losos, A. and Larson, J. B. (1996) ‘Phylogenetic systematics of adaptation’, in Rose, M. R. and Lauder, G. V. (eds) Adaptation, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 187-220.
54. McKinney, M. L. and McNamara, K. J. (1991) Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny, New York: Plenum.
55. Mooers, A. O., Vamosi, S. M. and Schluter, D. (1999) ‘Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae)', American Naturalist, 154, 249-259.
56. Mosimann, J. E., Malley, J. D., Cheever, A. W. and Clark, C. B. (1978) ‘Size and shape analysis of schistosome egg-counts in Egyptian autopsy data’, Biometrics, 34, 341-356.
57. Mueller, L. D. and Ayala, F. J. (1982) ‘Estimation and interpretation of genetic distance in empirical studies’, Genetical Research (Cambridge), 40, 127-137.
58. Neyman, J. and Scott, E. (1948) ‘Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations’, Econometrika, 16, 1-32.
59. Pagel, M. (1999) ‘Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution’, Nature, 401, 877-884.
60. Patterson, C. (1982) ‘Morphological characters and homology’, in Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E. (eds) Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction, London: Academic Press, pp. 21-74.
61. Penny, D. and Hendy, M. D. (1985) ‘The use of tree comparison metrics’, Systematic Zoology, 34, 75-82.
62. Pimentel, R.A. and Riggins, R. (1987) ‘The nature of cladistic data’, Cladistics, 3, 201-209.
63. Richtsmeier, J. T., Cole, T. M. III, Krovitz, G. E., Valeri, C. J. and Lele, S. (1998) ‘Preoperative morphology and development in sagittal synostosis’, Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 18, 64-78.
64. Rohlf, F. J. (1974) ‘Methods of comparing classifications’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 101-113.
65. Rohlf, F. J. (1982) ‘Consensus indices for comparing classifications’, Mathematical Biosciences, 59, 131-144.
66. Rohlf, F. J. and Marcus, L. F. (1993) ‘A revolution in morphometrics’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 129-132.
67. Rohlf, F. J. (1998) ‘On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny’, Systematic Biology, 47, 147-158.
68. Rosenberger, A. L. (1992) ‘Evolution of feeding niches in New World monkeys’, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88, 525-562.
69. Rosenberger, A. L. and Strier, K. B. (1989) ‘Adaptive radiation of the ateline primates’, Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 717-750.
70. Sanderson, M. L. and Hufford, L. (1996) ‘Homoplasy and the evolutionary process: an afterword’, in Sanderson, M. J. and Hufford, L. (eds) Homoplasy: the recurrence of similarity in evolution, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 327-330.
71. Simpson, G. G. (1961) Principles of animal taxonomy, New York: Columbia University Press.
72. Silverman, B. W. (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis, London: Chapman and Hall.
73. Sluys, R. (1989) ‘Rampant parallelism: an appraisal of the use of nonuniversal derived states in phylogenetic reconstruction’, Systematic Zoology, 38, 350-370.
74. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. (1973) Numerical taxonomy, San Francisco: Freeman.
75. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1962) ‘The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods’, Taxon, 11, 33-40.
76. Swofford, D. L. and Maddison, W. P. (1987) ‘Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony’, Mathematical Bioscience, 87, 199-229.
77. Wake, D. B. (1991) ‘Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations?', American Naturalist, 138, 543-567.
78. Wake, D. B. and Larson, A. (1987) ‘Multidimensional analysis of an evolving lineage’, Science, 238, 42-48.
79. Zelditch, M. L., Fink, W. L. and Swiderski, D. L. (1995) ‘Morphometrics, homology, and phylogenetics: quantified characters as synapomorphies’, Systematic Biology, 44, 179-189.
80. Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L. and Fink, W. L. (2000) ‘Discovery of phylogenetic characters in morphometric data’, in Wiens, J. J. (ed.) Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 37-83.