Automated optimization of potential parameters

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 3311-3320

  Di Pierro, Michele ^a   Elber, Ron ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882304520     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: 15499626     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct400313n     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Frenkel, D.; Berend, S. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications; Academic Press: San Diego, 1996.
2. Abrams, J. B., Tuckrman, M. E., Martyna, G. J. In Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology; Ferrario, M., Ciccotti, G., Binder, K., Eds.; Springer: Berin, 2006; Vol. 1, pp 139-192.
3. Brooks, B. R.; Brooks, C. L.; Mackerell, A. D.; Nilsson, L.; Petrella, R. J.; Roux, B.; Won, Y.; Archontis, G.; Bartels, C.; Boresch, S.; Caflisch, A.; Caves, L.; Cui, Q.; Dinner, A. R.; Feig, M.; Fischer, S.; Gao, J.; Hodoscek, M.; Im, W.; Kuczera, K.; Lazaridis, T.; Ma, J.; Ovchinnikov, V.; Paci, E.; Pastor, R. W.; Post, C. B.; Pu, J. Z.; Schaefer, M.; Tidor, B.; Venable, R. M.; Woodcock, H. L.; Wu, X.; Yang, W.; York, D. M.; Karplus, M. CHARMM: The Biomolecular Simulation Program J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30 (10) 1545-1614
4. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E.; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The AMBER biomolecular simulation programs J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26 (16) 1668-1688
5. Kaminski, G.; Friesner, R.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and reparameterization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105 (28) 6474-6487
6. Jorgensen, W. L.; Tiradorives, J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110 (6) 1657-1666
7. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79 (2) 926-935
8. Nocedal, J.; Wright, S. J. Numerical Optimization; Springer: New York, 1999.
9. Chen, A. A.; Pappu, R. V. Parameters of monovalent ions in the AMBER-99 forcefield: Assessment of inaccuracies and proposed improvements J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111 (41) 11884-11887
10. Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinf. 2006, 65 (3) 712-725
11. Ruymgaart, A. P.; Cardenas, A. E.; Elber, R. MOIL-opt: Energy-conserving molecular dynamics on a GPU/CPU system J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7 (10) 3072-3082
12. Elber, R.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C.; Goldstein, R.; Li, H. Y.; Verkhivker, G.; Keasar, C.; Zhang, J.; Ulitsky, A. Moil a program for simulations of macrmolecules Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91 (1-3) 159-189
13. Weiner, S. J.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A.; Singh, U. C.; Ghio, C.; Alagona, G.; Profeta, S.; Weiner, P. A new force-field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic-acids and proteins J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106 (3) 765-784
14. Tuckerman, M.; Berne, B. J.; Martyna, G. J. Reversible multiple time scale molecular-dynamics J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97 (3) 1990-2001
15. Weinbach, Y.; Elber, R. Revisiting and parallelizing SHAKE J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 209 (1) 193-206
16. Ruymgaart, A. P.; Elber, R. Revisiting molecular dynamics on a CPU/GPU system: Water kernel and SHAKE parallelization J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8 (11) 4624-4636
17. Ryckaert, J. P.; Ciccotti, G.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of N-alkanes J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23 (3) 327-341
18. Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. A smooth particle mesh ewald method J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103 (19) 8577-8593
19. Lin, M. M.; Mohammed, O. F.; Jas, G. S.; Zewail, A. H. Speed limit of protein folding evidenced in secondary structure dynamics Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108 (40) 16622-16627
20. Hegefeld, W. A.; Chen, S. E.; DeLeon, K. Y.; Kuczera, K.; Jas, G. S. Helix formation in a pentapeptide experiment and force-field dependent dynamics J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114 (47) 12391-12402
21. Mohammed, O. F.; Jas, G. S.; Lin, M. M.; Zewail, A. H. Primary peptide folding dynamics observed with ultrafast temperature jump Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48 (31) 5628-5632
22. Jas, G. S.; Hegefeld, W. A.; Majek, P.; Kuczera, K.; Elber, R. Experiments and comprehensive simulations of the formation of a helical turn J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116 (23) 6598-6610
23. Earl, D. J.; Deem, M. W. Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7 (23) 3910-3916
24. Sugita, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 314 (1-2) 141-151
25. Kirmizialtin, S.; Elber, R. Computational exploration of mobile ion distributions around RNA duplex J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114 (24) 8207-8220
26. 3 amide J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116 (18) 8288-8293
27. Vila, J. A.; Ripoll, D. R.; Scheraga, H. A. Physical reasons for the unusual alpha-helix stabilization afforded by charged or neutral polar residues in alanine-rich peptides Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97 (24) 13075-13079
28. Garcia, A. E.; Sanbonmatsu, K. Y. alpha-Helical stabilization by side chain shielding of backbone hydrogen bonds Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99 (5) 2782-2787
29. Best, R. B.; Hummer, G. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113 (26) 9004-9015
30. Best, R. B.; Zhu, X.; Shim, J.; Lopes, P. E. M.; Mittal, J.; Feig, M.; MacKerell, A. D. Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone phi, psi and side-chain chi(1) and chi(2) dihedral angles J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8 (9) 3257-3273
31. Jorgensen, W. L.; Madura, J. D. Temperature and size dependence for monte-carlo simulations of tip4p water Mol. Phys. 1985, 56 (6) 1381-1392
32. Mahoney, M. W.; Jorgensen, W. L. A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (20) 8910-8922
33. Ren, P. Y.; Ponder, J. W. Temperature and pressure dependence of AMOEBA water model J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108 (35) 13427-13437
34. Best, R. B.; Mittal, J. Protein simulations with an optimized water model: Cooperative helix formation and temperature-induced unfolded state collapse J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114 (46) 14916-14923
35. Abascal, J. L. F.; Vega, C. A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005 J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123 (23) 234505
36. Mackerell, A. D.; Feig, M.; Brooks, C. L. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25 (11) 1400-1415
37. Best, R. B.; Mittal, J.; Feig, M.; MacKerell, A. D. Inclusion of many-body effects in the additive CHARMM protein CMAP potential results in enhanced cooperativity of alpha-helix and beta-hairpin formation Biophys. J. 2012, 103 (5) 1045-1051
38. Sakae, Y.; Okamoto, Y. Amino-acid-dependent main-chain torsion-energy terms for protein systems. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138 (6).
39. Wu, J. C.; Chattree, G.; Ren, P. Y. Automation of AMOEBA polarizable force field parameterization for small molecules. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2012, 131 (3)
40. Baker, C. M.; Anisimov, V. M.; MacKerell, A. D. Development of CHARMM polarizable force field for nucleic acid bases based on the classical drude oscillator model J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (3) 580-596