Addressing the Lack of Measurement Invariance for the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 2278-2298

  Wagler, Amy ^a   Wagler, Ron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptance of evolutionary theory; Evolution; Factor analytic model; Internal consistency; Item response model; Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution; Preservice teachers; Validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882286746     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.808779     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akyol, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S. and Traynor, A. 2012. Modeling the interrelationships among pre-service science teachers' understanding and acceptance of evolution, their views on nature of science and self-efficacy beliefs regarding teaching evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23: 937 - 957. (doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9296-x)
2. Athanasiou, K., Katakos, E. and Papadopoulou, P. 2012. Conceptual ecology of evolution acceptance among Greek education students: The contribution of knowledge increase. Journal of Biological Education, 46 (4): 234 - 241. (doi:10.1080/00219266.2012.716780)
3. Athanasiou, K. and Papadopoulou, P. 2012. Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: Knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (6): 903 - 924. (doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.586072)
4. Bloom, J. W. 1989. Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of science: Science, theories and evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (4): 401 - 415. (doi:10.1080/0950069890110405)
5. Boyle, G. J. 1991. Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?. Personality & Individual Differences, 12: 291 - 294. (doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90115-R)
6. Choi, S. W., Gibbons, L. E., & Crane, P. K. (2011). lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Software, 39(8), 1-30. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v39/i08/
7. Cortina, J. M. 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 98 - 104. (doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98)
8. Cotner, S., Brooks, D. C. and Moore, R. 2010. Is the age of the earth one of our 'sorest troubles?' Students' perceptions about deep time affect their acceptance of evolutionary theory. Evolution, 64 (3): 858 - 864. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00911.x)
9. De Ayala, R. J. 2009. The theory and practice of item response theory, New York: Guilford Press.
10. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A. and Yilmaz, I. 2008. Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (4): 420 - 443. (doi:10.1002/tea.20223)
11. Donnelly, L. A., Kazempour, M. and Amirshokoohi, A. 2009. High school students' perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, 39: 643 - 660. (doi:10.1007/s11165-008-9097-6)
12. Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D. 1978. The New Environmental Paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9: 10 - 19.
13. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. and Jones, R. E. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 425 - 442. (doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176)
14. Ha, M., Haury, D. L. and Nehm, R. H. 2012. Feeling of certainty: Uncovering a missing link between knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49 (1): 95 - 121. (doi:10.1002/tea.20449)
15. Hawcroft, L. J. and Milfont, T. L. 2010. The use (and abuse) of the New Environmental Paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30: 143 - 158. (doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003)
16. Hogan, K. 2000. Exploring a process view of students' knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84: 51 - 70. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<51::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-H)
17. Hokayem, H. and BouJaoude, S. 2008. College students' perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (4): 395 - 419. (doi:10.1002/tea.20233)
18. Ingram, E. L. and Nelson, C. E. 2006. Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43: 7 - 26. (doi:10.1002/tea.20093)
19. Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319-342.
20. Kim, S. Y. and Nehm, R. H. 2011. A cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers' views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (2): 197 - 227. (doi:10.1080/09500690903563819)
21. Liu, C., Jack, B. and Chiu, H. 2007. Taiwan elementary teachers views of science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6: 19 - 35. (doi:10.1007/s10763-006-9065-4)
22. Moore, R. and Cotner, S. 2008. Educational Malpractice: The impact of including creationism in high school biology courses. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2 (1): 95 - 100. (doi:10.1007/s12052-008-0097-9)
23. Moore, R. and Cotner, S. 2009a. The creationist down the hall: Does it matter when teachers teach creationism. BioScience, 59 (5): 429 - 435. (doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.5.10)
24. Moore, R. and Cotner, S. 2009b. Rejecting Darwin: The occurrence & impact of creationism in high school biology classrooms. American Biology Teacher, 71 (2): 1 - 4. (doi:10.1662/005.071.0204)
25. Muthen, B. 1984. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49 (1): 115 - 132. (doi:10.1007/BF02294210)
26. Nadelson, L. S. and Southerland, S. A. 2010. Examining the interaction of acceptance and understanding: How does the relationship change with a focus on macroevolution?. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3: 82 - 88. (doi:10.1007/s12052-009-0194-4)
27. Nering, M. L., & Ostini, R. (2010). Handbook of polytomous item response theory models. New York: Routledge.
28. Nunez, E. E., Pringle, R. M. and Showalter, K. T. 2012. Evolution in the Caribbean classroom: A critical analysis of the role of biology teachers and science standards in shaping evolution instruction in Belize. International Journal of Science Education, 34 (15): 2421 - 2453. (doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.700529)
29. Olsson, U. 1979. Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coeffi{ligature}cient. Psychometrika, 44: 443 - 460. (doi:10.1007/BF02296207)
30. Peker, D., Comert, G. G. and Kence, A. 2010. Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates' acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19: 739 - 755. (doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9199-1)
31. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
32. Rice, D. C. and Kaya, S. 2012. Exploring relations among preservice elementary teachers' ideas about evolution, understanding of relevant science concepts, and college science coursework. Research in Science Education, 42: 165 - 179. (doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9193-2)
33. Riggs, I. and Enochs, L. 1990. Toward the development of an elementary teacher's science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74: 625 - 638. (doi:10.1002/sce.3730740605)
34. Rutledge, M. L. and Sadler, K. C. 2007. Reliability of the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher, 69 (6): 332 - 335. (doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[332:ROTMOA]2.0.CO;2)
35. Rutledge, M. L. and Warden, M. A. 1999. The development and validation of the Measure of Acceptance of the Theory instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99 (1): 13 - 18. (doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x)
36. Rutledge, M. L. and Warden, M. A. 2000. Evolutionary theory, the nature of science & high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62 (1): 23 - 31. (doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062[0023:ETTNOS]2.0.CO;2)
37. Smith, M. U. 2010. Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: I. philosophical/epistemological issues. Science & Education, 19: 523 - 538. (doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9215-5)
38. Trani, R. 2004. I won't teach evolution; It's against my religion. And now for the rest of the story. The American Biology Teacher, 66 (6): 419 - 427. (doi:10.1662/0002-7685(2004)066[0419:IWTIAM]2.0.CO;2)
39. Wiles, J. R. and Alters, B. 2011. Effects of an educational experience incorporating an inventory of factors potentially influencing student acceptance of biological evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (18): 2559 - 2585. (doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.565522)