In vitro analysis of the efficacy of ultrasonic scalers and a toothbrush for removing bacteria from resorbable blast material titanium disks

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1191-1198

  Park, Jun Beom ^a,c   Jang, Yun Ji ^b   Koh, Minchul ^b   Choi, Bong Kyu ^b   Kim, Kack Kyun ^b   Ko, Youngkyung ^a,c  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Dental scaling; Peri implantitis; Surface properties; Titanium; Toothbrushing

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; BIOMATERIAL; CARBON; COLORING AGENT; CRYSTAL VIOLET; DENTAL MATERIAL; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; PLASTIC; TITANIUM; TOOTHPASTE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL LOAD; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; PORPHYROMONAS GINGIVALIS; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; ULTRASOUND;

ALLOYS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BACTERIAL LOAD; CARBON; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; COLORING AGENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL SCALING; DENTIFRICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GENTIAN VIOLET; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; PLASTICS; PORPHYROMONAS GINGIVALIS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOOTHBRUSHING; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 84882251977     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.120369     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pereira da Silva CH, Vidigal GM Jr., de Uzeda M, de Almeida Soares G. Influence of titanium surface roughness on attachment of Streptococcus sanguis: An in vitro study. Implant Dent 2005;14:88-93.
2. Amoroso PF, Adams RJ, Waters MG, Williams DW. Titanium surface modification and its effect on the adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:633-637.
3. Baffone W, Sorgente G, Campana R, Patrone V, Sisti D, Falcioni T. Comparative effect of chlorhexidine and some mouthrinses on bacterial biofilm formation on titanium surface. Curr Microbiol 2011;62:445-451.
4. Badihi Hauslich L, Sela MN, Steinberg D, Rosen G, Kohavi D. The adhesion of oral bacteria to modified titanium surfaces: Role of plasma proteins and electrostatic forces [published online ahead of print December 13, 2011]. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02364.x.
5. Persson GR, Roos-Jansåker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert S. Microbiologic results after non-surgical erbium-doped: yttrium, aluminum, and garnet laser or air-abrasive treatment of peri-implantitis: A randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011;82:1267-1278.
6. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:522-534.
7. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2-8.
8. Franco M, Rigo L, Viscione A, et al. CaPO4 blasted implants inserted into iliac crest homologue frozen grafts. J Oral Implantol 2009;35:176-180.
9. Sanz A, Oyarzún A, Farias D, Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001; 10:126-131.
10. Simon M, Lagneau C, Moreno J, Lissac M, Dalard F, Grosgogeat B. Corrosion resistance and biocompatibility of a new porous surface for titanium implants. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:537-545.
11. Park JW, Suh JY, Chung HJ. Effects of calcium ion incorporation on osteoblast gene expression in MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on microstructured titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86:117-126.
12. Steigenga J, Al-Shammari K, Misch C, Nociti FH Jr., Wang HL. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. J Periodontol 2004; 75:1233-1241.
13. Drake DR, Paul J, Keller JC. Primary bacterial colonization of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:226-232.
14. Schou S, Berglundh T, Lang NP. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(Suppl.):140-149.
15. Renvert S, Samuelsson E, Lindahl C, Persson GR. Mechanical non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A double-blind randomized longitudinal clinical study. I: Clinical results. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:604-609.
16. Renvert S, Roos-Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: A literature review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35 (Suppl.):305-315.
17. Lindhe J, Meyle J; Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(Suppl.):282-285.
18. Duarte PM, Reis AF, de Freitas PM, Ota-Tsuzuki C. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments. J Periodontol 2009;80:1824-1832.
19. Unursaikhan O, Lee JS, Cha JK, et al. Comparative evaluation of roughness of titanium surfaces treated by different hygiene instruments. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2012;42:88-94.
20. Gantes BG, Nilveus R. The effects of different hygiene instruments on titanium surfaces: SEM observations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:225-239.
21. Stubinger S, Etter C, Miskiewicz M, et al. Surface alterations of polished and sandblasted and acidetched titanium implants after Er:YAG, carbon dioxide, and diode laser irradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:104-111.
22. Lee BC, Jung GY, Kim DJ, Han JS. Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:81-84.
23. Ali M, Hamzah E, Qazi IA, Toff MR. Effect of cathodic arc PVD parameters on roughness of TiN coating on steel substrate. Curr Appl Phys 2010;10:471-474.
24. Grzesik W, Wanat T. Surface finish generated in hard turning of quenched alloy steel parts using conventional and wiper ceramic inserts. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 2006;46:1988-1995.
25. Demircioglu P, Durakbasa MN. Investigations on machined metal surfaces through the stylus type and optical 3D instruments and their mathematical modeling with the help of statistical techniques. Measurement 2011;44:611-619.
26. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: A review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:63-74.
27. Whitehouse DJ. Surface characterization and roughness measurement in engineering. In: Rastogi PK, ed. Photomechanics, vol. 77. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2000:413-461.
28. Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: An in vitro study. J Periodontol 2004;75:1269-1273.
29. Hossain A, Okawa S, Miyakawa O. Effect of toothbrushing on titanium surface: An approach to understanding surface properties of brushed titanium. Dent Mater 2006;22:346-352.
30. Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Morgese F, Squillace A. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Implant Dent 2006;15:77-82.
31. Rapley JW, Swan RH, Hallmon WW, Mills MP. The surface characteristics produced by various oral hygiene instruments and materials on titanium implant abutments. Int J OralMaxillofac Implants 1990;5:47-52.
32. Hallmon WW, Waldrop TC, Meffert RM, Wade BW. A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:96-100.
33. Bain CA. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of various implant-cleaning instruments. Quintessence Int 1998; 29:423-427.
34. Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, Yagi H, Matsumoto K, Ito K. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: An in vivo study. J Periodontol 2007;78:1689-1694.
35. Park CY, Kim SG, Kim MD, Eom TG, Yoon JH, Ahn SG. Surface properties of endosseous dental implants after NdYAG and CO2 laser treatment at various energies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1522-1527.
36. Hossain A, Okawa S, Miyakawa O. Surface texture and composition of titanium brushed with toothpaste slurries of different pHs. Dent Mater 2007;23:186-192.
37. Siirilä HS, Könönen M. The effect of oral topical fluorides on the surface of commercially pure titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:50-54.
38. Hauser-Gerspach I, Kulik EM, Weiger R, Decker EM, Von Ohle C, Meyer J. Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dental implant and restorative materials in vitro. Dent Mater J 2007;26:361-366.
39. Scarano A, Piattelli A, Polimeni A, Di Iorio D, Carinci F. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and anatase-coated titanium healing screws: An in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2010;81:1466-1471.
40. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: An in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-296.