Adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to dental implant and restorative materials in vitro

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 361-366

  Hauser Gerspach, Irmgard ^a   Kulik, Eva M ^a   Weiger, Roland ^a   Decker, Eva Maria ^b   Von Ohle, Christiane ^b   Meyer, Jürg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Implant and prosthetic materials; Streptococcus sanguinis

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; GOLD; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; TITANIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; SALIVA; STREPTOCOCCUS SANGUINIS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; GOLD; HUMANS; POLYURETHANES; SALIVA; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STREPTOCOCCUS SANGUIS; TITANIUM;

EID: 35548995791     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.361     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Li J, Helmerhorst EJ, Leone CW, Troxler RF, Yaskell T, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Oppenheim FG. Identification of early microbial colonizers in human dental biofilm. J Appl Microbiol 2004; 97: 1311-1318.
2. Kolenbrander PE. Oral microbiol communities: Biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 2000; 54: 413-437.
3. Guggenheim B, Guggenheim M, Gmür R, Giertsen E, Thurnheer T. Application of the Zürich biofilm model to problems of cariology. Caries Res 2004; 38: 212-222.
4. Takatsuka T, Konishi N, Nakabo S, Hashimoto T, Torii Y, Yoshiyama M. Adhesion in vitro of oral streptococci to porcelain, composite resin, cement and human enamel. Dent Mater J 2000; 19: 363-372.
5. Decker EM, Weiger R, Wiech I, Heide PE, Brecx M. Comparison of antiadhesive and antibacterial effects of antiseptics on Streptococcus sanguinis. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 144-148.
6. Schweikl H. Cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of dental composite materials. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1713-1719.
7. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 361-366.
8. Grivet M, Morrier JJ, Benay G, Barsotti O. Effect of hydrophobicity on in vitro streptococcal adhesion to dental alloys. J Materials Sci: Mater Med 2000; 11: 637-642.
9. Decker EM, Weiger R, von Ohle C, Wiech I, Brecx M. Susceptibility of planktonic versus attached Streptococcus sanguinis cells to Chlorhexidine. Clin Oral Invest 2003; 7: 98-102.
10. Weiger R, Decker EM, Krastl G, Brecx M. Deposition and retention of vital and dead Streptococcus sanguinis cells on glass surfaces in a flow-chamber system. Arch Oral Biol 1999; 4: 621-628.
11. Dawes C, Watanabe S, Biglow-Lecomte P, Dibdin GH. Estimation of the velocity of the salivary film at some different locations in the mouth. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1479-1482.
12. Decker EM. The ability of direct fluorescence-based, two-colour assays to detect different physiological states of oral streptococci. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001; 33: 188-192.
13. Sardin S, Morrier J-J, Benay G, Barsotti O. In vitro streptococcal adherence on prosthetic and implant materials. Interactions with physicochemical surface properties. J Oral Rehab 2004; 31: 140-148.
14. Bos R, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions -its mechanisms and method for study. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1999; 23: 179-229.
15. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 1-14.
16. Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and periimplant mucositis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996; 7: 201-211.
17. Satou J, Fukunaga A, Morikawa A, Matsumae I, Satou N, Shintani H. Streptococcal adherence to uncoated and saliva-coated restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 1991; 18: 421-429.
18. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implant Res 2006; 17: 68-81.
19. Gong K, Mailloux L, Herzberg MC. Salivary film expresses a complex, macromolecular binding site for Streptococcus sanguis. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 8970-8974.
20. Carlen A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 481-487.
21. Steinberg D, Eyal S. Early formation of Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm on various dental restorative materials. J Dent 2002; 30: 47-51.
22. Bowden GH. Dental plaque revisited: oral biofilms in health and disease, Bioline, Cardiff, 1999, pp.211-253.
23. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 48-53.
24. Boeckh C, Schumacher E, Podbielski A, Haller B. Antibacterial activity of restorative dental biomaterials in vitro. Caries Res 2002; 36: 101-107.
25. Hamilton IR, Bowden GH. Fluoride in dentistry, Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 1988, pp.77-103.
26. Watson PS, Pontefract HA, Devine DA, Shore RC, Nattress BR, Kirkham J, Robinson C. Penetration of fluoride into natural plaque biofilms. J Dent Res 2005; 85: 451-455.
27. Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a microbial biofilm. Caries Res 2004; 38: 204-211.