Constructive Technology Assessment and Technology Dynamics: The Case of Clean Technologies

Science, Technology & Human Values

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 1992, Pages 36-56

  Schot, Johan W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84965404499     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: 15528251     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224399201700103     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akrich, Madeleine. 1987. How can technical objects be described? Paper presented at the International Workshop on the Integration of Social and Historical Studies of Technology, Enschede, 3-5 September.
2. Aldrich, H., and D. Herker. 1977. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review 2: 217-30.
3. Allen, Thomas J. 1977. Managing the flow of information. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Ashford, Nicholas A., Christine Ayers, and Robert F. Stone. 1985. Using regulation to change the market for innovation. Harvard Environmental Law Review 9: 419-66.
5. Ashford, Nicholas A., Sharon Moran, and Robert F. Stone. 1989. The role of insurance and financial requirements in preventing and compensating damage from environmental risks. Final report to the New Jersey Department of Insurance. Cambridge: MIT, Center for Technology, Policy and Industrial Development.
6. Baram, Michael S., Patricia S. Dillon, and Betsy Ruffle. 1990. Managing chemical risks: Corporate response to SARA Title III. Medford, MA: Tufts University, Center for Environmental Management.
7. Bijker, Wiebe E., Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, eds. 1987. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
8. Bradbury, Judith A. 1989. The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology & Human Values 14: 380-99.
9. Callon, Michel. 1986. The sociology of an actor network: The case of the electric vehicle. In Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, edited by Michel Callon, John Law, and Arie Rip, 19-44. London: Macmillan.
10. Coombs, R., Paolo Saviotti, and Vivien Walsh. 1987. Economics and technological change. London: Macmillan.
11. Cramer, J., J.W. Schot, F. Van den Akker, and G. Maas Geesteranus. 1990. Stimulating cleaner technologies through economic instruments: Possibilities and constraints. UNEP Industry and Environment Review 13(2): 46-53.
12. Dosi, Giovanni. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technological change. Research Policy 11: 147-62.
13. —.1988. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-71.
14. Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, and Luc Soete, eds. 1988. Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.
15. Douglas, Susan J. 1985. Technological innovation and organizational change: The Navys adoption of radio, 1899-1919. In Military enterprise and technological change: Perspectives on the American experience, edited by Merritt Roe Smith, 117-73. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. Freeman, Christopher. 1982. The economics of industrial innovation. London: Pinter.
17. Georg, Susse, Ulrik Jorgensen, and Inge Ropke. 1990. An evaluation of the Danish technology development program, 1986-1989. Internal paper. Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen Business School.
18. Hagedoorn, John, and Johan W. Schot. 1988. Cooperation between companies and technological development. Internal paper. Apeldoorn: Center for Technology and Policy Studies.
19. Hartje, V.J., and R.L. Lurie. 1985. Research and development incentives for pollution control innovations., End-of-pipe versus integrated process technology. Berlin: International Institute for Environment and Society.
20. Hughes, Thomas P. 1983. Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
21. Hunter, John S. 1989. Waste minimization through inventory control. Paper presented at the Waste Minimization Conference, New Brunswick, NJ, 10 May.
22. Kranakis, E. 1988. Technology assessment and the study of history. Science, Technology, & Human Values 13: 299-307.
23. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
24. Law, John. 1987a. The structure of sociotechnical engineering: A review of the new sociology of technology. Sociological Review 35: 404-25.
25. 1987b. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 111-34. Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Leydesdorff, Loet, and Peter van den Besselaar. 1987. What we have learned from the Amsterdam Science Shop. In The social direction of the public sciences: Sociology of the sciences yearbook. Vol. 6, edited by S. Blume, J. Bunders, L. Leydesdorff, and R. Whitley, 135-60. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. MacKenzie, Donald, and Judy Wajcman, eds. 1985. The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
28. Magat, Wesley A. 1979. The effects of environmental regulation on innovation. Law and Contemporary Problems 43: 4-25.
29. Misa, Thomas J. 1988. How machines make history, and how historians (and others) help them to do so. Science, Technology, & Human Values 13: 308-31.
30. Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1977. In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6: 36-76.
31. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1985. Environmental policy and technical change. Paris.
32. —.1987. The promotion and diffusion of clean technologies in industry. Paris. 1988. New technologies in the 1990s: A socio-economic strategy. Paris.
33. Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1987. The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology andhistory of technology, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P. Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 17-50. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34. Rip, Arie. 1988. The interest of the Netherlands Organisation of Technology Assessment in studies of science and technology. Paper presented at the 4S/EASST Conference Amsterdam, 16-19 November.
35. ———.1989. Expectations and strategic niche management in technological development. Paper presented at the international conference Inside the Black Box, Turin, 16-17 June.
36. Schot, Johan, Bas de Laat, Ronald van der Meijden, and Harry Bosma. 1991. Geven om de omgeving: Milieugedrag van ondernemingen in de chemische industrie. Netherlands Organization for Technology Assessment voorstudie no. 15. The Hague.
37. Smits, Ruud, and Jos Leyten. 1988. Key issues in the institutionalization of technology assessment: Development of technology assessment in five European countries and the USA. Futures 20: 19-36.
38. Staudenmaier, John M. 1985. Technologys storytellers: Reweaving the human fabric. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Supapol, A. Bhanich. 1990. The commercialization of government-sponsored technologies: Canadian evidence. Research Policy 19: 369-78.
40. Svenson, O. 1988. Management product hazards at Volvo car corporation. In Corporate management of health and safety hazards: A comparison of currentpractice, edited by Roger E. Kasperson, Jeanne X. Kasperson, Christoph Hohenemser, and Robert W. Kates. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41. Ullmann, Arieh A. 1982. Industrie und Umweltschutz: Implementation von Umweltschutzgesetzen in deutschen Unternehmen. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
42. Van den Belt, Henk, and Arie R. 1987. The Nelson-Winter-Dosi model and the synthetic dye chemistry. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker, Thomas P Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 159-90. Cambridge: MIT Press.