Recurrence quantification analysis of eye movements

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 842-856

  Anderson, Nicola C ^a   Bischof, Walter F ^b   Laidlaw, Kaitlin E W ^a   Risko, Evan F ^c   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Recurrence quantification analysis; Time series analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84881579561     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0299-5     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bertera, J. H., & Rayner, K. (2000). Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 576-585. doi: 10. 3758/BF03212109.
2. Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2008a). Gaze selection in complex social scenes. Visual Cognition, 16, 341-355. doi: 10. 1080/13506280701434532.
3. Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2008b). Social attention and real-world scenes: The roles of action, competition and social content. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 986-998. doi: 10. 1080/17470210701410375.
4. Boccignone, G., & Ferraro, M. (in press). Gaze shift behavior on video as composite information foraging. Signal Processing: Image Communication. doi: 10. 1016/j. image. 2012. 07. 002.
5. Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. (2008). Time series analysis (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
6. Brandt, S. A., & Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27-38. doi: 10. 1162/jocn. 1997. 9. 1. 27.
7. Bunke, H. (1992). Recent advances in string matching. In H. Bunke (Ed.), Advances in structural and syntactic pattern recognition (pp. 107-116). Singapore: World Scientific.
8. Cherubini, M., Nüssli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2010). This is it! Indicating and looking in collaborative work at distance. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(3), 1-20.
9. Cristino, F., Mathôt, S., Theeuwes, J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 692-700. doi: 10. 3758/BRM. 42. 3. 692.
10. Dale, R., Kirkham, N. Z., & Richardson, D. C. (2011a). The dynamics of reference and shared visual attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(355), 1-11. doi: 10. 3389/fpsyg. 2011. 00355.
11. Dale, R., Warlaumont, A. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2011b). Nominal cross recurrence as a generalized lag sequential analysis for behavioral streams. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 21, 1153-1161. doi: 10. 1142/S0218127411028970.
12. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.
13. Foster, D. H., & Bischof, W. F. (1991). Thresholds from psychometric functions: Superiority of bootstrap to incremental and probit variance estimators. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 152-159. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 109. 1. 152.
14. Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: Effects of image type and image features. Vision Research, 50, 779-795. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2010. 01. 019.
15. Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (in press). Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: An experimental test of scanpath theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi: 10. 1037/a0028227.
16. Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Underwood, G. (2008). Turning the world around: Patterns in saccade direction vary with picture orientation. Vision Research, 48, 1777-1790. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2008. 05. 018.
17. Foulsham, T., Teszka, R., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Saccade control in natural images is shaped by the information visible at fixation: Evidence from asymmetric gaze-contingent windows. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 266-283. doi: 10. 3758/s13414-010-0014-5.
18. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2008). What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision, 8(2)(6), 1-17. doi: 10. 1167/8. 2. 6.
19. Harding, G., & Bloj, M. (2010). Real and predicted influence of image manipulations on eye movements during scene recognition. Journal of Vision, 10(2)(8), 1-17. doi: 10. 1167/10. 2. 8.
20. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504.
21. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. L. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. W. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
22. Henderson, J. M., & Pierce, G. L. (2008). Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 566-573. doi: 10. 3758/PBR. 15. 3. 566.
23. Hoffman, M. W., Grimes, D. B., Shon, A. P., & Rao, R. P. N. (2006). A probabilistic model of gaze imitation and shared attention. Neural Networks, 19, 299-310. doi: 10. 1016/j. neunet. 2006. 02. 008.
24. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 28. 1. 113.
25. Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.
26. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-203. doi: 10. 1038/35058500.
27. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00166.
28. Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28, 1311-1328. doi: 10. 1068/p2935.
29. Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics - Doklady, 10, 707-710.
30. Loschky, L. C., & McConkie, G. W. (2002). Investigating spatial vision and dynamic attentional selection using a gaze-contingent multiresolutional display. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 8, 99-117. doi: 10. 1037/1076-898X. 8. 2. 99.
31. Mannan, S., Ruddock, K. H., & Wooding, D. S. (1995). Automatic control of saccadic eye movements made in visual inspection of briefly presented 2-D images. Spatial Vision, 9, 363-386. doi: 10. 1163/156856895X00052.
32. Marwan, N., & Kurths, J. (2002). Nonlinear analysis of bivariate data with cross recurrence plots. Physics Letters A, 302, 299-307.
33. Marwan, N., Wessel, N., Meyerfeldt, U., Schirdewan, A., & Kurths, J. (2002). Recurrence plot based measures of complexity and its application to heart rate variability data. Physical Review E, 66, 026702.
34. McCarley, J. S., Wang, R. F., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Peterson, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 01457.
35. Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171, 308-311. doi: 10. 1126/science. 171. 3968. 308.
36. Pannasch, S., Helmert, J. R., Roth, K., Herbold, A.-K., & Walter, H. (2008). Visual fixation durations and saccade amplitudes: Shifting relationship in a variety of conditions. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2)(4), 1-19.
37. Pellecchia, G. L., & Shockley, K. (2005). Cross recurrence quantification of interpersonal postural activity. In M. A. Riley & G. C. van Orden (Eds.), Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences (pp. 95-141). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from www. nsf. gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs. jsp.
38. Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2005). Looking to understand: The coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cognitive Science, 29, 1045-1060.
39. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Tomlinson, J. M. (2009). Conversation, gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context. Cognitive Science, 33, 1468-1482. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1551-6709. 2009. 01057. x.
40. Riley, M. A., & Clark, S. (2003). Recurrence analysis of human postural sway during the sensory organization test. Neuroscience Letters, 342, 45-48.
41. Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Lanthier, S., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Curious eyes: Individual differences in personality predict eye movement behavior in scene-viewing. Cognition, 122, 86-90.
42. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., & Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7(2)(17), 1-22. doi: 10. 1167/7. 2. 17.
43. Schaeffer, S. E. (2007). Graph clustering. Computer Science Review, 1, 27-64.
44. Shepherd, S. V., Steckenfinger, S. A., Hasson, U., & Ghasanfar, A. A. (2010). Human-monkey gaze correlations reveal convergent and divergent patterns of movie viewing. Current Biology, 20, 649-656.
45. Shockley, K. (2005). Cross recurrence quantification of interpersonal postural activity. In M. A. Riley & G. C. van Orden (Eds.), Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences (pp. 142-177). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from www. nsf. gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs. jsp.
46. Shockley, K., Richardson, D. C., & Dale, R. (2009). Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 305-319.
47. Shockley, K., Santana, M.-V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326-332. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 29. 2. 326.
48. Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2011). Looking back at Waldo: Oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations. Journal of Vision, 11(1)(3), 1-11. doi: 10. 1167/11. 1. 3.
49. Tatler, B. W., & Vincent, B. T. (2008). Systematic tendencies in scene viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2)(5), 1-18.
50. Underwood, G., Foulsham, T., & Humphrey, K. (2009). Saliency and scan patterns in the inspection of real-world scenes: Eye movements during encoding and recognition. Visual Cognition, 17, 812-834.
51. van Diepen, P. M. J., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2003). Early peripheral and foveal processing in fixations during scene perception. Visual Cognition, 10, 79-100.
52. von Luxburg, U. (2007). A tutorial on spectral clustering. Statistics and Computing, 17, 395-416.
53. Wagner, R. A., & Fischer, M. J. (1974). The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 21, 168-178.
54. Webber, C. L., Jr., & Zbilut, P. J. (2005). Recurrence quantification analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems. In M. A. Riley & G. C. van Orden (Eds.), Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences (pp. 26-94). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences. Retrieved August 25, 2011, from www. nsf. gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs. jsp.
55. Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York, NY: Plenum Press.