Early peripheral and foveal processing in fixations during scene perception

Visual Cognition

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 79-100

  van Diepen, Paul M J ^a   d'Ydewalle, Géry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AVERAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT CONTROL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; RETINA FOVEA; REVIEW; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037247707     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713756668     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bush, L.K., Hess, U., & Wolford, G. (1993). Transformations for within-subjects designs: A Monte Carlo investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 566-579.
2. Buswell, G.T. (1935). How people look at pictures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Crane, H.D., & Steele, C.M. (1985). Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. Applied Optics, 24, 527-537.
4. Findlay, J.M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617-631.
5. Henderson, J.M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 260-283). New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Henderson, J.M., & Hollingworth, A. (1998). Eye movements during scene viewing: An overview. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 269-293). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
7. Henderson, J.M., McClure, K.K., Pierce, S., & Schrock, G. (1997). Object identification without foveal vision: Evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 323-346.
8. Hughes, H.C., Nozawa, G., & Kitterle, F. (1996). Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 197-230.
9. Ishida, T., & Ikeda, M. (1989). Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 6, 1624-1632.
10. Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917.
11. McConkie, G.W., Underwood, N.R., Zola, D., & Wolverton, G.S. (1985). Some temporal characteristics of processing during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 168-186.
12. Morrison, R.E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
13. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 168-186.
14. Rayner, K., Inhoff, A.W., Morrison, R.E., Slowiaczek, M.L., & Bertera, J.H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 167-179.
15. Reichle, E.D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
16. Schyns, P.G., & Oliva, A. (1997). Flexible, diagnosticity-driven, rather than fixed, perceptually determined scale selection in scene and face recognition. Perception, 26, 1027-1038.
17. Shioiri, S. (1993). Postsaccadic processing of the retinal image during picture scanning. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 305-314.
18. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A.F., Hahn, S., & Irwin, D.E. (1998). Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, 379-385.
19. van Diepen, P.M.J. (1997). A pixel-resolution video switcher for eye-contingent display changes. Spatial Vision, 10, 335-344.
20. van Diepen, P.M.J. (1998). New data-acquisition software for the Leuven dual-PC controlled Purkinje eye-tracking system (Psych. Rep. No. 246). Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium.
21. van Diepen, P.M.J. (2001). Foveal stimulus degradation during scene perception. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 2, pp. 89-115). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
22. van Diepen, P.M.J., & De Graef, P. (1994). Line-drawing library and software toolbox (Psych. Rep. No. 165). Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium.
23. van Diepen, P.M.J., De Graef, P., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1995). Chronometry of foveal information extraction during scene perception. In J.M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R.W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 349-362). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
24. van Diepen, P.M.J., De Graef, P., & Van Rensbergen, J. (1994). On-line control of moving masks and windows on a complex background using the ATVista Videographics Adapter. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 26, 454-460.
25. van Diepen, P.M.J., Ruelens, L., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1999). Brief foveal masking during scene perception. Acta Psychologica, 101, 91-103.
26. van Diepen, P.M.J., & Wampers, M. (1998). Scene exploration with Fourier filtered peripheral information. Perception, 27, 1141-1151.
27. Van Rensbergen, J., & De Troy, A. (1993). A reference guide for the Leuven dual-PC controlled Purkinje eyetracking system (Psych. Rep. No. 145). Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium.
28. Yarbus, A.L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.