A 125 GeV composite Higgs boson versus flavour and electroweak precision tests

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 5, 2013, Pages

  Barbieri, Riccardo ^a   Buttazzo, Dario ^a   Sala, Filippo ^a   Straub, David M ^b   Tesi, Andrea ^a  

^a INFN SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; CP violation; Heavy Quark Physics; Technicolor and Composite Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878938848     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2013)069     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1207.7214 ] [ INSPIRE ].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [ arXiv:1207.7235 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 183 [ INSPIRE ].
4. H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan, Composite Higgs and custodial SU(2), Phys. Lett. B 145 (1984) 216 [ INSPIRE ].
5. R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol, Higgs as a holographic pseudoGoldstone boson, Nucl. Phys. B 671 (2003) 148 [ hep-ph/0306259 ] [ INSPIRE ].
6. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165 [ hep-ph/0412089 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. D.B. Kaplan, Flavor at SSC energies: a new mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses, Nucl. Phys. B 365 (1991) 259 [ INSPIRE ].
8. R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, Light custodians in natural composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 055014 [ hep-ph/0612048 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, The composite Higgs and light resonance connection, JHEP 08 (2012) 135 [ arXiv:1205.6434 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. M. Redi and A. Tesi, Implications of a light Higgs in composite models, JHEP 10 (2012) 166 [ arXiv:1205.0232 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. O. Matsedonskyi, G. Panico and A. Wulzer, Light top partners for a light composite Higgs, JHEP 01 (2013) 164 [ arXiv:1204.6333 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. D. Marzocca, M. Serone and J. Shu, General composite Higgs models, JHEP 08 (2012) 013 [ arXiv:1205.0770 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. G. Panico, M. Redi, A. Tesi and A. Wulzer, On the tuning and the mass of the composite Higgs, JHEP 03 (2013) 051 [ arXiv:1210.7114 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, I. Masina, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, The universal Higgs fit, arXiv:1303.3570 [ INSPIRE ].
15. CMS collaboration, Search for heavy, top-like quark pair production in the dilepton final state in pp collisions at √s =7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 103 [ arXiv:1203.5410 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. CMS collaboration, Search for pair produced fourth-generation up-type quarks in pp collisions at √s =7 TeV with a lepton in the final state, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 307 [ arXiv:1209.0471 ] [ INSPIRE ].
17. CMS collaboration, Search for heavy quarks decaying into a top quark and a W or Z boson using lepton + jets events in pp collisions at √s =7 TeV, JHEP 01 (2013) 154 [ arXiv:1210.7471 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. 5/3 and four top quarks production) in 4.7/fb of pp collisions at √s =7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-130 (2012).
19. R. Contino, T. Kramer, M. Son and R. Sundrum, Warped/composite phenomenology simplified, JHEP 05 (2007) 074 [ hep-ph/0612180 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. Y. Grossman and M. Neubert, Neutrino masses and mixings in nonfactorizable geometry, Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 361 [ hep-ph/9912408 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. S.J. Huber and Q. Shafi, Fermion masses, mixings and proton decay in a Randall-Sundrum model, Phys. Lett. B 498 (2001) 256 [ hep-ph/0010195 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Bulk fields and supersymmetry in a slice of AdS, Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 141 [ hep-ph/0003129 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. K. Agashe, G. Perez and A. Soni, Flavor structure of warped extra dimension models, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 016002 [ hep-ph/0408134 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, B. Duling, S. Gori and A. Weiler, ΔF = 2 observables and fine-tuning in a warped extra dimension with custodial protection, JHEP 03 (2009) 001 [ arXiv:0809.1073 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. M. Bauer, S. Casagrande, U. Haisch and M. Neubert, Flavor physics in the Randall-Sundrum model: II. Tree-level weak-interaction processes, JHEP 09 (2010) 017 [ arXiv:0912.1625 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. B. Keren-Zur et al., On partial compositeness and the CP asymmetry in charm decays, Nucl. Phys. B 867 (2013) 429 [ arXiv:1205.5803 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. C. Csáki, A. Falkowski and A. Weiler, The flavor of the composite pseudo-goldstone Higgs, JHEP 09 (2008) 008 [ arXiv:0804.1954 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. G. Cacciapaglia et al., A GIM mechanism from extra dimensions, JHEP 04 (2008) 006 [ arXiv:0709.1714 ] [ INSPIRE ].
29. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori and D. Pappadopulo, Composite fermions in electroweak symmetry breaking, JHEP 02 (2009) 029 [ arXiv:0811.2888 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. M. Redi and A. Weiler, Flavor and CP invariant composite Higgs models, JHEP 11 (2011) 108 [ arXiv:1106.6357 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, J. Jones-Perez, P. Lodone and D.M. Straub, U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1725 [ arXiv:1105.2296 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. 3 symmetry, JHEP 07 (2012) 181 [ arXiv:1203.4218 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115008 [ arXiv:0706.0432 ] [ INSPIRE ].
34. M. Baak et al., The Electroweak fit of the standard model after the discovery of a new boson at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2205 [ arXiv:1209.2716 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. K. Agashe, R. Contino, L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol, A custodial symmetry for Zbb, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 62 [ hep-ph/0605341 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. N. Vignaroli, ΔF = 1 constraints on composite Higgs models with LR parity, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115011 [ arXiv:1204.0478 ] [ INSPIRE ].
37. W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, Cornering new physics in b → s transitions, JHEP 08 (2012) 121 [ arXiv:1206.0273 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. G. Isidori, J.F. Kamenik, Z. Ligeti and G. Perez, Implications of the LHCb Evidence for Charm CP-violation, Phys. Lett. B 711 (2012) 46 [ arXiv:1111.4987 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. L. Calibbi, Z. Lalak, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler, Universal constraints on low-energy flavour models, JHEP 07 (2012) 004 [ arXiv:1204.1275 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. A.J. Buras, C. Grojean, S. Pokorski and R. Ziegler, FCNC effects in a minimal theory of fermion masses, JHEP 08 (2011) 028 [ arXiv:1105.3725 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. K. Agashe, A. Azatov and L. Zhu, Flavor Violation Tests of Warped/Composite SM in the Two-Site Approach, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 056006 [ arXiv:0810.1016 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. O. Gedalia, G. Isidori and G. Perez, Combining Direct & Indirect Kaon CP-violation to Constrain the Warped KK Scale, Phys. Lett. B 682 (2009) 200 [ arXiv:0905.3264 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala and D.M. Straub, Less minimal flavour violation, JHEP 10 (2012) 040 [ arXiv:1206.1327 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. 1 of pp Collisions at √s =8 TeV collected by the ATLAS Detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-088 (2012).
45. CMS collaboration, Search for Narrow Resonances using the Dijet Mass Spectrum in pp Collisions at √s of 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-016 (2012).
46. M. Redi, Composite MFV and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2030 [ arXiv:1203.4220 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. O. Domenech, A. Pomarol and J. Serra, Probing the SM with Dijets at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 074030 [ arXiv:1201.6510 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. - decays in the Standard model and beyond, JHEP 01 (2009) 019 [ arXiv:0811.1214 ] [ INSPIRE ].