Natural SUSY predicts: Higgs couplings

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Blum, Kfir ^a   D'Agnolo, Raffaele Tito ^a,b,c   Fan, Jiji ^d  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (United States)

^b INFN SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

^c CERN   (Switzerland)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Higgs Physics; Supersymmetric Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872304455     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2013)057     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. CMS collaboration, Interpretation of Searches for Supersymmetry, CMS-PAS-SUS-11-016 (2011).
2. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in √s=7 TeV proton-proton collisions, ATLAS-CONF-2012-033 (2012).
3. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2005) 073 [ hep-th/0405159 ].
4. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, JHEP 09 (2012) 035 [ arXiv:1110.6926 ].
5. Y. Kats, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, The status of GMSB after 1/fb at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2012) 115 [ arXiv:1110.6444 ].
6. C. Brust, A. Katz, S. Lawrence and R. Sundrum, SUSY, the third generation and the LHC, JHEP 03 (2012) 103 [ arXiv:1110.6670 ].
7. R. Essig, E. Izaguirre, J. Kaplan and J.G. Wacker, Heavy flavor simplified models at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2012) 074 [ arXiv:1110.6443 ].
8. ATLAS collaboration, Search for scalar bottom pair production with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 181802 [ arXiv:1112.3832 ].
9. ATLAS collaboration, Search for scalar top quark pair production in natural gauge mediated supersymmetry models with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 715 (2012) 44 [ arXiv:1204.6736 ].
10. S. Dimopoulos and G. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with nonuniversal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [ hep-ph/9507282 ].
11. A.G. Cohen, D. Kaplan and A. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [ hep-ph/9607394 ].
12. R. Auzzi, A. Giveon and S.B. Gudnason, Flavor of quiver-like realizations of effective supersymmetry, JHEP 02 (2012) 069 [ arXiv:1112.6261 ].
13. C. Csáki, L. Randall and J. Terning, Light stops from Seiberg duality, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075009 [ arXiv:1201.1293 ].
14. N. Craig, M. McCullough and J. Thaler, Flavor mediation delivers natural SUSY, JHEP 06 (2012) 046 [ arXiv:1203.1622 ].
15. N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos and T. Gherghetta, Split families unified, JHEP 04 (2012) 116 [ arXiv:1203.0572 ].
16. C. Csáki, Y. Grossman and B. Heidenreich, MFV SUSY: a natural theory for R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095009 [ arXiv:1111.1239 ].
17. P.W. Graham, D.E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran and P. Saraswat, Displaced supersymmetry, JHEP 07 (2012) 149 [ arXiv:1204.6038 ].
18. J. Fan, M. Reece and J.T. Ruderman, Stealth supersymmetry, JHEP 11 (2011) 012 [ arXiv:1105.5135 ].
19. J. Fan, M. Reece and J.T. Ruderman, A Stealth Supersymmetry Sampler, JHEP 07 (2012) 196 [ arXiv:1201.4875 ].
20. J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti and J.G. Wacker, Searching for directly decaying gluinos at the Tevatron, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 34 [ arXiv:0803.0019 ].
21. J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti and J.G. Wacker, Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015005 [ arXiv:0809.3264 ].
22. T.J. LeCompte and S.P. Martin, Large Hadron Collider reach for supersymmetric models with compressed mass spectra, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015004 [ arXiv:1105.4304 ].
23. T.J. LeCompte and S.P. Martin, Compressed supersymmetry after 1/fb at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035023 [ arXiv:1111.6897 ].
24. G.D. Kribs and A. Martin, Supersoft supersymmetry is super-safe, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115014 [ arXiv:1203.4821 ].
25. CMS collaboration, Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [ arXiv:1202.1488 ].
26. CMS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 403 [ arXiv:1202.1487 ].
27. CMS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the decay channel H to ZZ to 4 leptons in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111804 [ arXiv:1202.1997 ].
28. -1 of pp collision data at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [ arXiv:1202.1408 ].
29. -1 of pp collisions at √s=7 TeV with ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111803 [ arXiv:1202.1414 ].
30. -1 of pp collision data at √s=7 TeV with ATLAS, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 383 [ arXiv:1202.1415 ].
31. -1 of Data, arXiv:1203.3774.
32. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs scalar for LHC SUSY and neutralino dark matter searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075010 [ arXiv:1112.3017 ].
33. S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal and G. Weiglein, Interpreting the LHC Higgs Search Results in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 201 [ arXiv:1112.3026 ].
34. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi, F. Mahmoudi and J. Quevillon, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for supersymmetric models, Phys. Lett. B 708 (2012) 162 [ arXiv:1112.3028 ].
35. - and dark matter direct detection, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1906 [ arXiv:1112.3032 ].
36. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [ arXiv:1112.3647 ].
37. T. Moroi, R. Sato and T.T. Yanagida, Extra Matters Decree the Relatively Heavy Higgs of Mass about 125 GeV in the Supersymmetric Model, Phys. Lett. B 709 (2012) 218 [ arXiv:1112.3142 ].
38. O. Buchmueller et al., Higgs and supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2020 [ arXiv:1112.3564 ].
39. J. Cao, Z. Heng, D. Li and J.M. Yang, Current experimental constraints on the lightest Higgs boson mass in the constrained MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 665 [ arXiv:1112.4391 ].
40. U. Ellwanger, A Higgs boson near 125 GeV with enhanced di-photon signal in the NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 044 [ arXiv:1112.3548 ].
41. Z. Kang, J. Li and T. Li, On naturalness of the MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 11 (2012) 024 [ arXiv:1201.5305 ].
42. K.A. Olive, The impact of XENON100 and the LHC on supersymmetric dark matter, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 384 (2012) 012010 [ arXiv:1202.2324 ].
43. J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [ arXiv:1202.3262 ].
44. H. Baer, V. Barger and A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar, JHEP 05 (2012) 091 [ arXiv:1202.4038 ].
45. J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [ arXiv:1202.5821 ].
46. F. Jegerlehner, Implications of low and high energy measurements on SUSY models, Frascati Phys. Ser. 54 (2012) 42 [ arXiv:1203.0806 ].
47. Z. Kang, T. Li, T. Liu, C. Tong and J.M. Yang, A heavy SM-like Higgs and a Light Stop from Yukawa-Deflected Gauge Mediation, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095020 [ arXiv:1203.2336 ].
48. D. Curtin, P. Jaiswal and P. Meade, Excluding electroweak baryogenesis in the MSSM, JHEP 08 (2012) 005 [ arXiv:1203.2932 ].
49. T. Cohen, D.E. Morrissey and A. Pierce, Electroweak baryogenesis and Higgs signatures, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 013009 [ arXiv:1203.2924 ].
50. N.D. Christensen, T. Han and S. Su, MSSM Higgs bosons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115018 [ arXiv:1203.3207 ].
51. F. Boudjema and G.D. La Rochelle, Beyond the MSSM Higgs bosons at 125 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015018 [ arXiv:1203.3141 ].
52. A. Fowlie et al., The CMSSM favoring new territories: the impact of new LHC limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075010 [ arXiv:1206.0264 ].
53. J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, The constrained NMSSM and Higgs near 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 454 [ arXiv:1201.0982 ].
54. S. King, M. Muhlleitner and R. Nevzorov, NMSSM Higgs Benchmarks Near 125 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 207 [ arXiv:1201.2671 ].
55. 6 SSM, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055010 [ arXiv:1201.2898 ].
56. C.-F. Chang, K. Cheung, Y.-C. Lin and T.-C. Yuan, Mimicking the standard model Higgs boson in UMSSM, JHEP 06 (2012) 128 [ arXiv:1202.0054 ].
57. D.A. Vasquez et al., The 125 GeV Higgs in the NMSSM in light of LHC results and astrophysics constraints, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035023 [ arXiv:1203.3446 ].
58. R.S. Gupta, H. Rzehak and J.D. Wells, How well do we need to measure Higgs boson couplings?, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095001 [ arXiv:1206.3560 ].
59. P. Draper, P. Meade, M. Reece and D. Shih, Implications of a 125 GeV Higgs for the MSSM and Low-Scale SUSY Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095007 [ arXiv:1112.3068 ].
60. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP 04 (2012) 131 [ arXiv:1112.2703 ].
61. M. Farina, C. Grojean and E. Salvioni, (Dys)Zphilia or a custodial breaking Higgs at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2012) 012 [ arXiv:1205.0011 ].
62. M. Drees, R. Godbole and P. Roy, Theory and phenomenology of sparticles: An account of four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetry in high energy physics, World Scientific, Singapore (2004).
63. J. Ellis, T. Hahn, S. Heinemeyer, K. Olive and G. Weiglein, WMAP-compliant Benchmark surfaces for MSSM Higgs bosons, JHEP 10 (2007) 092 [ arXiv:0709.0098 ].
64. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63.
65. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry, naturalness and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 095004 [ hep-ph/0602096 ].
66. M.A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, M. Voloshin and V.I. Zakharov, Low-energy theorems for Higgs boson couplings to photons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 30 (1979) 711.
67. R. Dermisek and I. Low, Probing the stop sector and the sanity of the MSSM with the Higgs boson at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035012 [ hep-ph/0701235 ].
68. A. Arvanitaki and G. Villadoro, A non standard model Higgs at the LHC as a sign of naturalness, JHEP 02 (2012) 144 [ arXiv:1112.4835 ].
69. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, D. Asner et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ-lepton properties, arXiv:1010.1589.
70. sγ Decay, JHEP 08 (2010) 099 [ arXiv:1003.5012 ].
71. 2), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 022002 [ hep-ph/0609232 ].
72. M. Perelstein and C. Spethmann, A collider signature of the supersymmetric golden region, JHEP 04 (2007) 070 [ hep-ph/0702038 ].
73. - in supersymmetry, JHEP 04 (2007) 058 [ hep-ph/0612166 ].
74. J. Gunion, G. Gamberini and S. Novaes, Can the Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric model be detected at a hadron collider via two photon decays?, Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 3481.
75. A. Djouadi, V. Driesen, W. Hollik and J.I. Illana, The coupling of the lightest SUSY Higgs boson to two photons in the decoupling regime, Eur. Phys. J. C 1 (1998) 149 [ hep-ph/9612362 ].
76. M.A. Diaz and P. Fileviez Perez, Can we distinguish between h(SM) and h0 in split supersymmetry?, J. Phys. G 31 (2005) 563 [ hep-ph/0412066 ].
77. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021.
78. K. Blum and R.T. D'Agnolo, 2 Higgs or not 2 Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 714 (2012) 66 [ arXiv:1202.2364 ].
79. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah and C.E. Wagner, A 125 GeV SM-like Higgs in the MSSM and the γγ rate, JHEP 03 (2012) 014 [ arXiv:1112.3336 ].
80. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah, C.E. Wagner and L.-T. Wang, Light Stau phenomenology and the Higgs γγ rate, JHEP 07 (2012) 175 [ arXiv:1205.5842 ].
81. J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: the approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 075019 [ hep-ph/0207010 ].
82. G. Branco et al., Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1106.0034 ].
83. L. Randall, Two Higgs models for large tan β and heavy second Higgs, JHEP 02 (2008) 084 [ arXiv:0711.4360 ].
84. M.S. Carena, J. Espinosa, M. Quirós and C. Wagner, Analytical expressions for radiatively corrected Higgs masses and couplings in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 355 (1995) 209 [ hep-ph/9504316 ].
85. L.J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The top quark mass in supersymmetric SO(10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [ hep-ph/9306309 ].
86. P. Batra, A. Delgado, D.E. Kaplan and T.M. Tait, The Higgs mass bound in gauge extensions of the minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP 02 (2004) 043 [ hep-ph/0309149 ].
87. A. Maloney, A. Pierce and J.G. Wacker, D-terms, unification and the Higgs mass, JHEP 06 (2006) 034 [ hep-ph/0409127 ].
88. M. Cvetič, D.A. Demir, J. Espinosa, L. Everett and P. Langacker, Electroweak breaking and the mu problem in supergravity models with an additional U(1), Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 2861 [Erratum ibid. D 58 (1998) 119905] [ hep-ph/9703317 ].
89. D.E. Morrissey and J.D. Wells, The tension between gauge coupling unification, the Higgs boson mass and a gauge-breaking origin of the supersymmetric mu-term, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015008 [ hep-ph/0512019 ].
90. M. Dine, N. Seiberg and S. Thomas, Higgs physics as a window beyond the MSSM (BMSSM), Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 095004 [ arXiv:0707.0005 ].
91. K. Blum, C. Delaunay and Y. Hochberg, Vacuum (Meta)Stability Beyond the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 075004 [ arXiv:0905.1701 ].
92. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Higgs bosons near 125 GeV in the NMSSM with constraints at the GUT scale, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012 (2012) 625389 [ arXiv:1203.5048 ].
93. M. Klute, R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch and D. Zerwas, Measuring Higgs couplings from LHC data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 101801 [ arXiv:1205.2699 ].
94. M.E. Peskin, Comparison of LHC and ILC Capabilities for Higgs Boson Coupling Measurements, arXiv:1207.2516.
95. CMS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying to a W pair in the fully leptonic final state in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 91 [ arXiv:1202.1489 ].
96. * →ℓνℓν decay mode with 4.7/fb of ATLAS data at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 62 [ arXiv:1206.0756 ].
97. CMS collaboration, Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to τ pairs in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 68 [ arXiv:1202.4083 ].
98. -1 of ATLAS data at 7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2012-014 (2012).
99. CMS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying to bottom quarks in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 284 [ arXiv:1202.4195 ].
100. 1 of pp collision data at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-015 (2012).
101. CDF collaboration, Combined Upper Limit on Standard Model Higgs Boson Production at CDF for March 2012, http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/new/hdg/ Results-files/results/cdfcomb-mar2012/.
102. -1 of Data, D0 Note 6304-CONF, http://www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results/prelim/HIGGS/H128/H128.pdf.
103. CMS collaboration, Combination of SM, SM4, FP Higgs boson searches, CMS-PAS-HIG-12-008 (2012).
104. 1 of pp collision data at √s=7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2012-019 (2012).
105. R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch, D. Zerwas and M. Dührssen, Measuring the Higgs sector, JHEP 08 (2009) 009 [ arXiv:0904.3866 ].
106. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP 06 (2012) 117 [ arXiv:1203.4254 ].
107. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Interpreting LHC Higgs results from natural new physics perspective, JHEP 07 (2012) 136 [ arXiv:1202.3144 ].
108. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, Fingerprinting Higgs suspects at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2012) 097 [ arXiv:1202.3697 ].
109. J. Ellis and T. You, Global analysis of experimental constraints on a possible Higgs-like particle with mass ~ 125 GeV, JHEP 06 (2012) 140 [ arXiv:1204.0464 ].
110. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, JHEP 04 (2012) 127 [ arXiv:1202.3415 ].
111. A. Azatov et al., Determining Higgs couplings with a model-independent analysis of h → γγ, JHEP 06 (2012) 134 [ arXiv:1204.4817 ].
112. A. Azatov, S. Chang, N. Craig and J. Galloway, Higgs fits preference for suppressed down-type couplings: implications for supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075033 [ arXiv:1206.1058 ].
113. M. Carena, K. Kong, E. Ponton and J. Zurita, Supersymmetric Higgs bosons and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 015001 [ arXiv:0909.5434 ].
114. R.S. Chivukula, H.-J. He, J. Howard and E.H. Simmons, The structure of electroweak corrections due to extended gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 015009 [ hep-ph/0307209 ].