Connecting the Dots: Object Connectedness Deceives Perception but Not Movement Planning

Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1456-1465

  Milne, Jennifer L ^a   Chapman, Craig S ^b   Gallivan, Jason P ^c   Wood, Daniel K ^a   Culham, Jody C ^a   Goodale, Melvyn A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

action; motor processes; movement planning; perception; reaching movements; scene parsing; two visual streams

Indexed keywords

ACTION; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PROCESSES; MOVEMENT PLANNING; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACHING MOVEMENTS; REACTION TIME; SCENE PARSING; TWO VISUAL STREAMS; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTION; MOTOR PROCESSES; MOVEMENT PLANNING; PERCEPTION; REACHING MOVEMENTS; SCENE PARSING; TWO VISUAL STREAMS;

FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881249062     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612473485     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Allik J.,Tuulmets T.Occupancy model of perceived numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics. 1991;49:303-314.
2. Brainard D. H.The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision. 1997;10:433-436.
3. Burr D.,Ross J.A visual sense of number.Current Biology. 2008;18:425-428.
4. BurrD. C.TuriM.AnobileG. (2010). Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. Journal of Vision, 10(6), Article 20. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/6/20.full.pdf+html.
5. Chapman C. S.,Gallivan J. P.,Wood D. K.,Milne J. L.,Culham J. C.,Goodale M. A.Reaching for the unknown: Multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task.Cognition. 2010a;116:168-176.
6. Chapman C. S.,Gallivan J. P.,Wood D. K.,Milne J. L.,Culham J. C.,Goodale M. A.Short-term motor plasticity revealed in a visuomotor decision-making task.Behavioral Brain Research. 2010b;214:130-134.
7. Cisek P.,Kalaska J. F.Simultaneous encoding of multiple potential reach directions in dorsal premotor cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology. 2002;87:1149-1154.
8. Cisek P.,Kalaska J. F.Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action.Neuron. 2005;3:801-814.
9. Crajé C.,van der Kamp J.,Steenbergen B.The effect of the "rod-and-frame" illusion on grip planning in a sequential object manipulation task.Experimental Brain Research. 2008;185:53-62.
10. Dehaene S.,Changeux J. P.Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1993;5:390-407.
11. Dehaene S.,Cohen L.Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1994;20:958-975.
12. Durgin F. H.Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited.Current Biology. 2008;18:R855-R856.
13. Franconeri S. L.,Bemis D. K.,Alvarez G. A.Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects.Cognition. 2009;113:1-13.
14. Franz V. H.Planning versus online control: Dynamic illusion effects in grasping?.Spatial Vision. 2003;16:211-223.
15. Franz V. H.,Gegenfurtner K. R.,Bülthoff H. H.,Fahle M.Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.Psychological Science. 2000;11:20-25.
16. Gallivan J. P.,Chapman C. S.,Wood D. K.,Milne J. L.,Culham J. C.,Goodale M. A.One to four and nothing more: Nonconscious parallel individuation of objects during action planning.Psychological Science. 2011;22:803-811.
17. Glover S.Visual illusions affect planning but not control.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2002;6:288-292.
18. Glover S.,Rosenbaum D. A.,Graham J.,Dixon P.Grasping the meaning of words.Experimental Brain Research. 2004;154:103-108.
19. Goodale M. A.,Milner A. D.Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Trends in Neurosciences. 1992;15:20-25.
20. He L.,Zhang J.,Zhou T.,Chen L.Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16:509-517.
21. Kaufman E. L.,Lord M. W.,Reese T.,Volkmann J.The discrimination of visual number.American Journal of Psychology. 1949;62:496-525.
22. Mendoza J.,Hansen S.,Glazebrook C. M.,Keetch K. M.,Elliot D.Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: A multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.Human Movement Science. 2005;24:760-773.
23. Oldfield R. C.The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97-113.
24. Pastor-Bernier A.,Cisek P.Neural correlates of biased competition in premotor cortex.Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:7083-7088.
25. Pelli D. G.The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision. 1997;10:437-442.
26. Ramsay J. O.,Silverman B. W.Functional data analysis. 2005). Functional data analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.New York, NY: Springer; 2005.
27. Song J. H.,Nakayama K.Target selection in visual search as revealed by movement trajectories.Vision Research. 2008;48:853-861.
28. Song J. H.,Nakayama K.Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009;13:360-366.
29. Trick L. M.,Pylyshyn Z. W.What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1993;19:331-351.
30. Trick L. M.,Pylyshyn Z. W.Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity pre-attentive stage in vision.Psychological Review. 1994;101:80-102.
31. VetterP.ButterworthB.BahramiB. (2008). Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: Evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism. PLoS ONE, 3, e3269. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0003269.
32. WoodD. K.GallivanJ. P.ChapmanC. S.MilneJ. L.CulhamJ. C.GoodaleM. A. (2011). Visual salience dominates early visuomotor competition in reaching behavior. Journal of Vision, 11(10), Article 16. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/10/16.full.pdf+html.