Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Burr, David C ^a,b   Turi, Marco ^a,c   Anobile, Giovanni ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c CNR   (Italy)

^d DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROSCIENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Attention; Middle vision; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ATTENTION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 79955148035     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.6.20     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alais, D., Morrone, C., & Burr, D. (2006). Separate attentional resources for vision and audition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 1339-1345.
2. Ansari, D., Lyons, I. M., van Eimeren, L., & Xu, F. (2007). Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1845-1853.
3. Arrighi, R., & Burr, D. (2009). Vision and audition do not share attentional resources in sustained tasks [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):206, 206a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/8/206, doi:10.1167/9.8.206.
4. Atkinson, J., Campbell, F. W.,&Francis, M. R. (1976). The magic number 4 ± 0: A new look at visual numerosity judgements. Perception, 5, 327-334.
5. Balakrishnan, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1992). Subitizing: Magical numbers or mere superstition? Psychological Research, 54, 80-90.
6. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
7. Burr, D., & Ross, J. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18, 425-428.
8. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goaldirected and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
9. Dacke, M., & Srinivasan, M. V. (2008). Evidence for counting in insects. Animal Cognitive, 11, 683-689.
10. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, X. P. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 390-407.
11. Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., & Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 320, 1217-1220.
12. Egeth, H. E., Leonard, C. J., & Palomares, M. (2008). The role of attention in subitizing: Is the magical number 1? Visual Cognition, 16, 463-473.
13. Franconeri, S. L., Bemis, D. K., & Alvarez, G. A. (2009). Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects. Cognition, 113, 1-13.
14. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning (pp. viii, 648 p.). Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
15. Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43-74.
16. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496-499.
17. Halberda, J., Mazzocco, M. M., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665-668.
18. Hauser, M. D., Tsao, F., Garcia, P., & Spelke, E. S. (2003). Evolutionary foundations of number: Spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins. Proceedings of Biological Science, 270, 1441-1446.
19. He, L., Zhang, J., Zhou, T., & Chen, L. (2009). Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 509-517.
20. Izard, V., Sann, C., Spelke, E. S., & Streri, A. (2009). Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10382-10385.
21. Jevons, W. S. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 363-372.
22. Juan, C.-H., Walsh, V., & McLeod, P. (2000). Preattentive vision and enumeration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Research, 41, S39.
23. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T, and Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 496-525.
24. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1-22.
25. Melcher, D. (2009). A shared sensorimotor map for visual memory, counting and trans-saccadic perception [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):184, 184a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/8/184, doi:10.1167/9.8.184.
26. Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., & Miller, E. K. (2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 297, 1708-1711.
27. Nieder, A., & Miller, E. K. (2004). Analog numerical representations in rhesus monkeys: Evidence for parallel processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 889-901.
28. Olivers, C., & Watson, D. (2008). Subitizing requires attention. Visual Cognition, 16, 439-462.
29. Pepperberg, I. M. (2006). Grey parrot numerical competence: A review. Animal Cognitive, 9, 377-391.
30. Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., et al. (in press). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition.
31. Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B., & Price, C. J. (2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? Neuroimage, 15, 435-446.
32. Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
33. Railo, H., Koivisto, M., Revonsuo, A., & Hannula, M. M. (2008). The role of attention in subitizing. Cognition, 107, 82-104.
34. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860.
35. Revkin, S. K., Piazza, M., Izard, V., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19, 607-614.
36. Ross, J. (2003). Visual discrimination of number without counting. Perception, 32, 867-870.
37. Ross, J., & Burr, D. C. (2010). Vision senses number directly. Journal of Vision, 10(2):10, 1-8, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/2/10, doi:10.1167/10.2.10.
38. Sathian, K., Simon, T. J., Peterson, S., Patel, G. A., Hoffman, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (1999). Neural evidence linking visual object enumeration and attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 36-51.
39. Sawamura, H., Shima, K., & Tanji, J. (2002). Numerical representation for action in the parietal cortex of the monkey. Nature, 415, 918-922.
40. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 331-351.
41. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limitedcapacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80-102.
42. Vetter, P., Butterworth, B., & Bahrami, B. (2008). Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: Evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism. PLoS ONE, 3, e3269.
43. Vetter, P., Butterworth, B., & Bahrami, B. (2010). A candidate for the attentional bottleneck: Set-size specific modulation of the right TPJ during attentive enumeration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1-9.
44. Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130-137.
45. Xu, F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1-B11.
46. Xu, F., Spelke, E. S., & Goddard, S. (2005). Number sense in human infants. Developmental Science, 8, 88-101.
47. Xu, X., & Liu, C. (2008). Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 440, 140-144.