Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the upper limb functional index

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Cuesta Vargas, Antonio I ^a,b   Gabel, Philip C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

Author keywords

Outcome measure; Psychometrics; Spanish; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; EUROQOL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE 5 DIMENSION; FEMALE; GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; UPPER LIMB FUNCTIONAL INDEX; ARM; CULTURAL FACTOR; DISABILITY; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPAIN; STANDARDS; TRANSLATING (LANGUAGE); VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPAIN; TRANSLATING; UPPER EXTREMITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84880957634     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-126     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Garratt A. Patient reported outcome measures in trials, Editorial. BMJ 2009, 338:2597.
2. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M. PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group During its First Two Years. Med Care 45(5):S3-S11.
3. Fayers PM, Machin D, et al. Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes 2000, Wiley: Chichester.
4. Morris LA, Miller DW. The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: need for a flexible standard. Value Health 2002, 5:372-381. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.x, 12102699.
5. McPhail SM, Bagraith KS, Schippers M, Wells PJ, Hatton A. Use of Condition Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials among Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Adv Orthop 2012, 273421:10.
6. Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, Neller A. The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. J Hand Ther 2006, 19(3):328-349. 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.001, 16861132.
7. Gabel CP, Michener LA, Melloh M, Burkett B. Modification of the Upper Limb Functional Index to a Three-point Response Improves Clinimetric Properties. J Hand Ther 2010, 23(1):41-52. 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.007, 19963344.
8. Michener LA, Leggins BG. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther 2001, 14(2):68-76. 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80036-3, 11382257.
9. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortene disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009, 18(6):920-926. 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015, 19297202.
10. Miller LA, Swanson S. Summary and Recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures. J Prosthet Orthot 2009, 21:83-89.
11. Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M. Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review [In French]. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2004, 47(6):389-395. 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05.016, 15297130.
12. Schoneveld K, Wittink H, Takken T. Clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation. J Hand Ther 2009, 22(3):221-236. 10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.005, 19278825.
13. Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15(2):126-134.
14. Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RWJ. Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Bone Joint Surg Am 2012, 94(3):277-285.
15. Germann G, Harth A, Wind G, Demir E. Standardisation and validation of the German version 2.0 of the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) questionnaire (in German). Unfallchirurg 2003, 106(13):19.
16. Greenslade JR, Mehta RL, Belward P, Warwick DJ. DASH and Boston Questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?. J Hand Surg 2004, 29(2):159-164.
17. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN. Group UEC Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(5):1038-1046. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060, 15866967, Group UEC.
18. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001, 14(2):128-146. 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80043-0, 11382253.
19. Van de Ven-Stevens LA, Munneke M, Terwee CB, Spauwen PH, van der Linde H. Clinimetric properties of instruments to assess activities in patients with hand injury: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 90(1):151-169. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.024, 19154842.
20. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:34-42. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, 17161752.
21. Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA. Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Am J Occup Ther 2011, 65(2):169-178. 10.5014/ajot.2011.000794, 21476364.
22. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G. Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010, 91(9):1370-1377. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.022, 20801254.
23. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011, 11(63):174-188.
24. Kass RA, Tinsley HEA. Factor analysis. J Leisure Res 1979, 11:120-138.
25. Doward LC, McKenna SP. Defining Patient-Reported Outcomes. Value Health 2004, 7:4-8.
26. Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, Burkett B. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 10:161.
27. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Gautheron V, Macé Y, Fermanian J, Mayoux Benhamou A, Roren A, Rannou F, Roby-Brami A, Revel M, Poiraudeau S. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders. Man Ther 2009, 14(2):206-212. 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013, 18436467.
28. Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Brigatti E. Psychometric properties of QuickDASH - A classical test theory and Rasch analysis study. Man Ther 2011, 16(2):177-182. 10.1016/j.math.2010.10.004, 21044859.
29. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Qual Life Res 2009, 18(8):1043-1051. 10.1007/s11136-009-9529-4, 19707887.
30. Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, Katz JN, Vickers-Lahti M. Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the Upper Extremity Function Scale. J Occup Environ Med 1997, 39(12):1195-1202. 10.1097/00043764-199712000-00014, 9429173.
31. Sambandam SN, Priyanka PAG, Ilango B. Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int Orthop 2008, 32(4):497-504. 10.1007/s00264-007-0344-7, 2532277, 17370071.
32. Stratford PW. Getting more from the Literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can 2004, 56:27-30.
33. Heffor C, Abbott JH, Heffor C, Abbott. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness in Patients With Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Problems. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012, 42(2):56-65.
34. Gabel CP, Melloh M, Burkett B, Michener L. The Lower Limb Functional Index: development and validation of the clinimetric properties and practical characteristics. Phys Ther 2012, 92(1):98-110. 10.2522/ptj.20100199, 22052947.
35. Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Romero S, Velozo CA. A comparison of the abiity of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. J Hand Ther 2010, 23(1):31-39. 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.006, 19944563.
36. Stock SR, Streiner D. The impact of neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders on the lives of affected workers: development of a new functional status index. Qual Life Res 1995, 4:491.
37. Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM. A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. Occup Environ Med 2002, 59(10):664-670. 10.1136/oem.59.10.664, 1740227, 12356925.
38. Dale LM, Strain-Riggs SR. Comparing responsiveness of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and the Upper Limb Functional Index. Work 2012, [Epub ahead of print].
39. PROQoLD website http://www.proqolid.org/instruments/upper_limb_functional_index_ulfi?fromSearch=yes&text=yes.
40. Paises de habla hispana promueven uso del español en la ONU http://www.un.org/spanish/News/fullstorynews.asp?news ID?=?6370&criteria1?=?cultura.
41. Badía X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A. The Spanish version of EuroQoL: A description and its applications. European Quality of Life scale. Med Clin (Barc) 1999, 112:79-85.
42. Hervás MT, Navarro Collado MJ, Peiró S, Rodrigo Pérez JL, López Matéu P, Martínez Tello I. panish version of the DASH questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness [Article in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc) 2006, 127(12):441-447.
43. Cuesta-Vargas A, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Farasyn A. Development of a Spanish version of the " Backache Index" Cross cultural linguistic adaptation and reliability. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2010, 23:105-110.
44. Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK. International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition. Psicothema 2013, 25:151-157.
45. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
46. Field A. Discovering Statistics using SPSS 2005, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
47. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.80 2007, Chicago: Scientific Software International.
48. Alderman AK, Chung KC. Measuring Outcomes in Hand Surgery. Clin in Plastic Surg 2008, 35:239-250.