Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders

Manual Therapy

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 206-212

  Fayad, Fouad ^a   Lefevre Colau, Marie Martine ^b,e   Gautheron, Vincent ^c,e   Macé, Yann ^a   Fermanian, Jacques ^d   Mayoux Benhamou, Anne ^a   Roren, Alexandra ^a   Rannou, François ^a   Roby Brami, Agnès ^e   Revel, Michel ^a,e   Poiraudeau, Serge ^a,e  

^a Cochin Hospital ^*  (France)

^b Paris Descartes University   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^d HÔPITAL NECKER ENFANTS MALADES   (France)

^e University Paris Descartes   (France)

Author keywords

Disability; Outcome measure; QuickDASH questionnaire; Shoulder

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROTATOR CUFF; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SHOULDER FRACTURES; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; SHOULDER JOINT; SHOULDER PAIN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60649085568     PISSN: 1356689X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Atroshi I., Gummesson C., Andersson B., Dahlgren E., and Johansson A. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 71 (2000) 613-618
2. Baron G., Tubach F., Ravaud P., Logeart I., and Dougados M. Validation of a short form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale in hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism 57 (2007) 633-638
3. Beaton D.E., Katz J.N., Fossel A.H., Wright J.G., Tarasuk V., and Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy 14 (2001) 128-146
4. Beaton D.E., Wright J.G., Katz J.N., and Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume 87 (2005) 1038-1046
5. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
6. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8 (1999) 135-160
7. Bot S.D., Terwee C.B., van der Windt D.A., Bouter L.M., Dekker J., and de Vet H.C. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 63 (2004) 335-341
8. Comrey A.L. A first course in factor analysis (1973), New York Academic Press, New York
9. Constant C.R., and Murley A.H.G. A clinical method for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 214 (1987) 160-164
10. Dubert T., Voche P., Dumontier C., and Dinh A. The DASH questionnaire. French translation of a trans-cultural adaptation. Chirurgie de la Main 20 (2001) 294-302
11. Fayad F., Mace Y., and Lefevre-Colau M.M. Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 48 (2005) 298-306
12. Feleus A., Bierma-Zeinstra S.M., Miedema H.S., Bernsen R.M., Verhaar J.A., and Koes B.W. Incidence of non-traumatic complaints of arm, neck and shoulder in general practice. Manual Therapy 13 (2008) 426-433
13. Fermanian J. Measuring agreement between 2 observers: a quantitative case. Revue Epidémiologique et Santé Publique 32 (1984) 408-413
14. Fermanian J. Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined?. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique 48 (2005) 281-287
15. Fortin P.R., Stucki G., and Katz J.N. Measuring relevant change: an emerging challenge in rheumatologic clinical trials. Arthritis and Rheumatism 38 (1995) 1027-1030
16. Gabel C.P., Michener L.A., Burkett B., and Neller A. The upper limb functional index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Journal of Hand Therapy 19 (2006) 328-348
17. Gummesson C., Atroshi I., and Ekdahl C. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 4 (2003) 11
18. Gummesson C., Ward M.M., and Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 7 (2006) 44
19. Guyatt G.H., Feeny D.H., and Patrick D.L. Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine 118 (1993) 622-629
20. Haavardsholm E.A., Kvien T.K., Uhlig T., Smedstad L.M., and Guillemin F. A comparison of agreement and sensitivity to change between AIMS2 and a short form of AIMS2 (AIMS2-SF) in more than 1,000 rheumatoid arthritis patients. Journal of Rheumatology 27 (2000) 2810-2816
21. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29 (1996) 602-608
22. Husted J.A., Cook R.J., Farewell V.T., and Gladman D.D. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53 (2000) 459-468
23. Imaeda T., Toh S., Wada T., Uchiyama S., Okinaga S., Kusunose K., et al. Validation of the Japanese society for surgery of the hand version of the quick disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 11 (2006) 248-253
24. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing (1993), Routledge, London/New York, NY
25. Lee E.W., Chung M.M., Li A.P., and Lo S.K. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) 30 (2005) 29-34
26. Lefevre-Colau M.M., Poiraudeau S., Oberlin C., Demaille S., Fermanian J., Rannou F., et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the modified Kapandji index for assessment of functional mobility of the rheumatoid hand. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84 (2003) 1032-1038
27. Linsell L., Dawson J., Zondervan K., Rose P., Randall T., Fitzpatrick R., et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology 45 (2006) 215-221
28. Matheson L.N., Melhorn J.M., Mayer T.G., Theodore B.R., and Gatchel R.J. Reliability of a visual analog version of the QuickDASH. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume 88 (2006) 1782-1787
29. Nunnally J.C., and Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. (1994), Mc Graw Hill, New York
30. Offenbaecher M., Ewert T., Sangha O., and Stucki G. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). The Journal of Rheumatology 29 (2002) 401-402
31. Padua R., Padua L., Ceccarelli E., Romanini E., Zanoli G., Amadio P.C., et al. Italian version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) 28 (2003) 179-186
32. Poiraudeau S., Chevalier X., Conrozier T., Flippo R.M., Liote F., Noel E., et al. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Cochin hand functional disability scale in hand osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 9 (2001) 570-577
33. Rekola K.E., Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S., and Takala J. Use of primary health services in sparsely populated country districts by patients with musculoskeletal symptoms: consultations with a physician. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 47 (1993) 153-157
34. Schmitt J.S., and Di Fabio R.P. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 57 (2004) 1008-1018
35. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass coefficients: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86 (1979) 420-428
36. Streiner D.L. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 39 (1994) 135-140
37. de Vet H.C., Ader H.J., Terwee B.C., and Pouwer F. Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research 14 (2005) 1203-1218
38. Ware Jr. J.E., Keller S.D., Gandek B., Brazier J.E., and Sullivan M. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. International Quality of Life Assessment. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 11 (1995) 525-551